Participatory Action Research (PAR) - to better understand the experiences of nurse academics working in a team.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Contemporary Nurse Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-15 DOI:10.1080/10376178.2021.1999835
Louise Ward, Ruby Walter
{"title":"Participatory Action Research (PAR) - to better understand the experiences of nurse academics working in a team.","authors":"Louise Ward,&nbsp;Ruby Walter","doi":"10.1080/10376178.2021.1999835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is considerable literature outlining the high levels of occupational stress nurse academics experience, and the potential effect of workplace pressure on mental health and wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Objectives/aims/hypotheses: </strong>To support the notion that to succeed in an academic environment, academics are more successful when working in a team, two academics conducted a Participation Action Research study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The PAR study was developed in line with a <i>Clinical Skill Project</i> to better understand the experiences of nurse academics working in a team. The <i>Clinical Skills Project</i> involved the write up of 40 nursing skills for publication. Twenty-seven academics were recruited into the project and allocated skills to write, in teams of 2-3, according to clinical expertise and interest. The Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach formed the framework for the project, as well as, provided an opportunity for the nurse academics to 'come together' at fortnightly team meetings to discuss the project and talk about their experience working in a team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the PAR cyclical process of observing, reflecting, planning, and acting there was ongoing opportunity for the academic nurses to discuss, question and share knowledge about academic practices. These Interactive reflections were recorded in a team reflective diary during the meetings. Participants were also asked to reflect on their individual experience of working in the team, before, during and after the project. At the completion of the project all reflective comments were transcribed to form a combined narrative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thematic and content analysis was then undertaken to identify any similarities and or differences in academic staff experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The analysis revealed the following key themes. <i>Working in a team creates better staff relationships</i>, <i>Working in a team can change workplace culture</i> and <i>Working in a team can Improve staff health and well-being</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":55633,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Nurse","volume":"57 3-4","pages":"269-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10376178.2021.1999835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: There is considerable literature outlining the high levels of occupational stress nurse academics experience, and the potential effect of workplace pressure on mental health and wellbeing.

Objectives/aims/hypotheses: To support the notion that to succeed in an academic environment, academics are more successful when working in a team, two academics conducted a Participation Action Research study.

Design: The PAR study was developed in line with a Clinical Skill Project to better understand the experiences of nurse academics working in a team. The Clinical Skills Project involved the write up of 40 nursing skills for publication. Twenty-seven academics were recruited into the project and allocated skills to write, in teams of 2-3, according to clinical expertise and interest. The Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach formed the framework for the project, as well as, provided an opportunity for the nurse academics to 'come together' at fortnightly team meetings to discuss the project and talk about their experience working in a team.

Methods: Using the PAR cyclical process of observing, reflecting, planning, and acting there was ongoing opportunity for the academic nurses to discuss, question and share knowledge about academic practices. These Interactive reflections were recorded in a team reflective diary during the meetings. Participants were also asked to reflect on their individual experience of working in the team, before, during and after the project. At the completion of the project all reflective comments were transcribed to form a combined narrative.

Results: Thematic and content analysis was then undertaken to identify any similarities and or differences in academic staff experience.

Conclusions: The analysis revealed the following key themes. Working in a team creates better staff relationships, Working in a team can change workplace culture and Working in a team can Improve staff health and well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
参与式行动研究(PAR) -更好地了解护士学者在团队中工作的经验。
背景:有相当多的文献概述了护士学者经历的高水平职业压力,以及工作场所压力对心理健康和福祉的潜在影响。目标/目的/假设:为了支持在学术环境中取得成功,学者在团队合作中更成功的观点,两位学者进行了一项参与行动研究。设计:PAR研究是根据临床技能项目开发的,以更好地了解护士学者在团队中工作的经验。临床技能项目包括撰写40项护理技能以供出版。该项目招募了27名学者,并根据临床专业知识和兴趣,以2-3人一组的方式分配写作技能。参与式行动研究(PAR)方法形成了项目的框架,并为护士学者提供了一个机会,在每两周的团队会议上“聚在一起”讨论项目并谈论他们在团队中的工作经验。方法:采用PAR的观察、反思、计划和行动的循环过程,为学院派护士提供持续的机会来讨论、提问和分享关于学术实践的知识。这些互动的反思被记录在会议期间的团队反思日记中。参与者还被要求反思他们在项目之前、期间和之后在团队中工作的个人经历。在项目完成时,所有的反思性评论都被转录成一个综合的叙述。结果:然后进行主题和内容分析,以确定学术人员经验的任何相似和/或差异。结论:分析揭示了以下关键主题。在团队中工作可以创造更好的员工关系,在团队中工作可以改变工作场所文化,在团队中工作可以改善员工的健康和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Nurse
Contemporary Nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Nurse is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to increase nursing skills, knowledge and communication, assist in professional development and to enhance educational standards by publishing stimulating, informative and useful articles on a range of issues influencing professional nursing research, teaching and practice. Contemporary Nurse is a forum for nursing educators, researchers and professionals who require high-quality, peer-reviewed research on emerging research fronts, perspectives and protocols, community and family health, cross-cultural research, recruitment, retention, education, training and practitioner perspectives. Contemporary Nurse publishes original research articles, reviews and discussion papers.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing job satisfaction among advanced nurse practitioners: insights and reflections from Taiwan Special Issue: Advances in Frailty Science Special Issue: Quality Improvement Developing nursing interventions in Paediatric Emergence Delirium: a scoping review Integrating technology in aged care: challenges, opportunities, and a nursing lens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1