Meta-Analysis of Joint Test of SNP and SNP-Environment Interaction with Heterogeneity.

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Human Heredity Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-26 DOI:10.1159/000519098
Qinqin Jin, Gang Shi
{"title":"Meta-Analysis of Joint Test of SNP and SNP-Environment Interaction with Heterogeneity.","authors":"Qinqin Jin,&nbsp;Gang Shi","doi":"10.1159/000519098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many complex diseases are caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), environmental factors, and the interaction between SNPs and environment. Joint tests of the SNP and SNP-environment interaction effects (JMA) and meta-regression (MR) are commonly used to evaluate these SNP-environment interactions. However, these two methods do not consider genetic heterogeneity. We previously presented a random-effect MR, which provided higher power than the MR in datasets with high heterogeneity. However, this method requires group-level data, which sometimes are not available. Given this, we designed this study to evaluate the introduction of the random effects of SNP and SNP-environment interaction into the JMA, and then extended this to the random effect model. Likelihood ratio statistic is applied to test the JMA and the new method we proposed in this paper. We evaluated the null distributions of these tests, and the powers for this method. This method was verified by simulation and was shown to provide similar powers to the random effect meta-regression method (RMR). However, this method only requires study-level data which relaxed the condition of the RMR. Our study suggests that this method is more suitable for finding the association between SNP and diseases in the absence of group-level data.</p>","PeriodicalId":13226,"journal":{"name":"Human Heredity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Heredity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Many complex diseases are caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), environmental factors, and the interaction between SNPs and environment. Joint tests of the SNP and SNP-environment interaction effects (JMA) and meta-regression (MR) are commonly used to evaluate these SNP-environment interactions. However, these two methods do not consider genetic heterogeneity. We previously presented a random-effect MR, which provided higher power than the MR in datasets with high heterogeneity. However, this method requires group-level data, which sometimes are not available. Given this, we designed this study to evaluate the introduction of the random effects of SNP and SNP-environment interaction into the JMA, and then extended this to the random effect model. Likelihood ratio statistic is applied to test the JMA and the new method we proposed in this paper. We evaluated the null distributions of these tests, and the powers for this method. This method was verified by simulation and was shown to provide similar powers to the random effect meta-regression method (RMR). However, this method only requires study-level data which relaxed the condition of the RMR. Our study suggests that this method is more suitable for finding the association between SNP and diseases in the absence of group-level data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SNP和SNP-环境相互作用与异质性联合检验的meta分析。
许多复杂疾病是由单核苷酸多态性(snp)、环境因素以及snp与环境的相互作用引起的。SNP和SNP-环境相互作用效应的联合检验(JMA)和元回归(MR)是评估这些SNP-环境相互作用的常用方法。然而,这两种方法没有考虑遗传异质性。我们之前提出了一种随机效应MR,它在具有高异质性的数据集中提供了比MR更高的功率。然而,这种方法需要组级别的数据,而这些数据有时是不可用的。鉴于此,我们设计了本研究,以评估在JMA中引入SNP和SNP-环境相互作用的随机效应,并将其扩展到随机效应模型。应用似然比统计量对JMA和本文提出的新方法进行检验。我们评估了这些检验的零分布,以及该方法的幂。该方法经仿真验证,与随机效应元回归方法(RMR)具有相似的功效。然而,该方法只需要研究水平的数据,这放宽了RMR的条件。我们的研究表明,在没有群体水平数据的情况下,这种方法更适合寻找SNP与疾病之间的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Heredity
Human Heredity 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gathering original research reports and short communications from all over the world, ''Human Heredity'' is devoted to methodological and applied research on the genetics of human populations, association and linkage analysis, genetic mechanisms of disease, and new methods for statistical genetics, for example, analysis of rare variants and results from next generation sequencing. The value of this information to many branches of medicine is shown by the number of citations the journal receives in fields ranging from immunology and hematology to epidemiology and public health planning, and the fact that at least 50% of all ''Human Heredity'' papers are still cited more than 8 years after publication (according to ISI Journal Citation Reports). Special issues on methodological topics (such as ‘Consanguinity and Genomics’ in 2014; ‘Analyzing Rare Variants in Complex Diseases’ in 2012) or reviews of advances in particular fields (‘Genetic Diversity in European Populations: Evolutionary Evidence and Medical Implications’ in 2014; ‘Genes and the Environment in Obesity’ in 2013) are published every year. Renowned experts in the field are invited to contribute to these special issues.
期刊最新文献
Place of concordance-discordance model in evaluating NGS performance. Implications of the Co-Dominance Model for Hardy-Weinberg Testing in Genetic Association Studies. Joint Linkage and Association Analysis Using GENEHUNTER-MODSCORE with an Application to Familial Pancreatic Cancer. Investigation of Recessive Effects of Coding Variants on Common Clinical Phenotypes in Exome-Sequenced UK Biobank Participants. comorbidPGS: An R Package Assessing Shared Predisposition between Phenotypes Using Polygenic Scores.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1