The nature of reported safety events related to care coordination in the operating room setting in a tertiary academic center

Sindhu Krishnan MD, Kimberly K. Wheeler DNP, RN, CNOR, Marc Philip Pimentel MD, MPH, CPPS, Joshua C. Vacanti MD, Richard D. Urman MD, MBA
{"title":"The nature of reported safety events related to care coordination in the operating room setting in a tertiary academic center","authors":"Sindhu Krishnan MD,&nbsp;Kimberly K. Wheeler DNP, RN, CNOR,&nbsp;Marc Philip Pimentel MD, MPH, CPPS,&nbsp;Joshua C. Vacanti MD,&nbsp;Richard D. Urman MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Adverse event reporting systems are important tools for identifying areas of risk and opportunities for education and improvement. Our goal was to examine the nature of perioperative incident reports related to care coordination that were filed by staff at an academic tertiary care center.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>In this retrospective data review, perioperative safety reports between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. Information examined included the type of staff who initiated the report, location of the incident, type of incident and the severity level of event, including patient harm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>Out of the 7827 reports evaluated, 61.2% of reports were filed by nurses, and 5.6% by physicians. We investigated one particular category called “coordination of care” and found the specific event most commonly reported was insufficient handoff (15.0%–26.9%), with severity level reported primarily being no to minor harm reaching the patient. However, communication failures were judged to be one of leading causes of inadvertent harm.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <p>It is imperative for hospital incident reporting systems to collect data on issues related to communication failures and to design interventions with the help of frontline staff to provide high quality, safe care to patients and to remain compliant with regulatory requirements and hospital policies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","volume":"41 3","pages":"25-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhrm.21491","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhrm.21491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse event reporting systems are important tools for identifying areas of risk and opportunities for education and improvement. Our goal was to examine the nature of perioperative incident reports related to care coordination that were filed by staff at an academic tertiary care center.

In this retrospective data review, perioperative safety reports between 2015 and 2020 were analyzed. Information examined included the type of staff who initiated the report, location of the incident, type of incident and the severity level of event, including patient harm.

Out of the 7827 reports evaluated, 61.2% of reports were filed by nurses, and 5.6% by physicians. We investigated one particular category called “coordination of care” and found the specific event most commonly reported was insufficient handoff (15.0%–26.9%), with severity level reported primarily being no to minor harm reaching the patient. However, communication failures were judged to be one of leading causes of inadvertent harm.

It is imperative for hospital incident reporting systems to collect data on issues related to communication failures and to design interventions with the help of frontline staff to provide high quality, safe care to patients and to remain compliant with regulatory requirements and hospital policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报告的与三级学术中心手术室护理协调相关的安全事件的性质
不良事件报告系统是确定风险领域和教育和改进机会的重要工具。我们的目的是研究由学术三级护理中心的工作人员提交的与护理协调相关的围手术期事件报告的性质。在本回顾性资料综述中,分析了2015年至2020年的围手术期安全报告。审查的信息包括提出报告的工作人员的类型、事件的地点、事件的类型和事件的严重程度,包括对患者的伤害。在7827份评估报告中,61.2%的报告由护士提交,5.6%由医生提交。我们调查了一个称为“护理协调”的特定类别,发现最常报告的特定事件是交接不足(15.0%-26.9%),报告的严重程度主要是对患者无至轻微伤害。然而,沟通失败被认为是造成意外伤害的主要原因之一。医院事故报告系统必须收集与沟通失败有关的数据,并在前线员工的帮助下设计干预措施,为病人提供高质量、安全的护理,并遵守监管规定和医院政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Risk Management is published quarterly by the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM). The purpose of the journal is to publish research, trends, and new developments in the field of healthcare risk management with the ultimate goal of advancing safe and trusted patient-centered healthcare delivery and promoting proactive and innovative management of organization-wide risk. The journal focuses on insightful, peer-reviewed content that relates to patient safety, emergency preparedness, insurance, legal, leadership, and other timely healthcare risk management issues.
期刊最新文献
Haddon matrix model: Application to workplace violence in a hospital setting. Case law update. Creation of root cause analysis and action (RCA2) standard work by a multidisciplinary team to prevent harm, reduce bias, and improve safety culture. Streamlining incident reporting system: A lean approach to enhance patient and staff safety in a Middle Eastern prehospital emergency care setting. Humbled and honored.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1