Bromhexine Hydrochloride Prophylaxis of COVID-19 for Medical Personnel: A Randomized Open-Label Study.

Q3 Immunology and Microbiology Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2022-01-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/4693121
Evgeny N Mikhaylov, Tamara A Lyubimtseva, Aleksandr D Vakhrushev, Dmitry Stepanov, Dmitry S Lebedev, Elena Yu Vasilieva, Alexandra O Konradi, Evgeny V Shlyakhto
{"title":"Bromhexine Hydrochloride Prophylaxis of COVID-19 for Medical Personnel: A Randomized Open-Label Study.","authors":"Evgeny N Mikhaylov,&nbsp;Tamara A Lyubimtseva,&nbsp;Aleksandr D Vakhrushev,&nbsp;Dmitry Stepanov,&nbsp;Dmitry S Lebedev,&nbsp;Elena Yu Vasilieva,&nbsp;Alexandra O Konradi,&nbsp;Evgeny V Shlyakhto","doi":"10.1155/2022/4693121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bromhexine hydrochloride has been suggested as a TMPRSS2 protease blocker that precludes the penetration of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. We aimed to assess the preventive potential of regular bromhexine hydrochloride intake for COVID-19 risk reduction in medical staff actively involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre randomized open-label study, medical staff managing patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and followed up for 8 weeks. The study began at the initiation of COVID-19 management in the clinic. The study was prematurely terminated after the enrollment of 50 participants without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection: 25 were assigned to bromhexine hydrochloride treatment (8 mg 3 times per day), and 25 were controls. The composite primary endpoint was a positive nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 or signs of clinical infection within 28 days and at week 8. Secondary endpoints included time from the first contact with a person with COVID-19 to the appearance of respiratory infection symptoms; the number of days before a first positive SARS-CoV-2 test; the number of asymptomatic participants with a positive nasopharyngeal swab test; the number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases; and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of the combined primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the active treatment group (2/25 [8%]) and control group (7/25 [28%]); <i>P</i>=0.07. A fewer number of participants developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the treatment group compared to controls (0/25 vs. 5/25; <i>P</i>=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the study was underpowered, it showed that Bromhexine hydrochloride prophylaxis was associated with a reduced rate of symptomatic COVID-19. The prophylactic treatment was not associated with a lower combined primary endpoint rate, a positive swab PCR test, or COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04405999).</p>","PeriodicalId":39128,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"4693121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8799951/pdf/","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4693121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Immunology and Microbiology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: Bromhexine hydrochloride has been suggested as a TMPRSS2 protease blocker that precludes the penetration of SARS-CoV-2 into cells. We aimed to assess the preventive potential of regular bromhexine hydrochloride intake for COVID-19 risk reduction in medical staff actively involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: In a single-centre randomized open-label study, medical staff managing patients with suspected and confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled and followed up for 8 weeks. The study began at the initiation of COVID-19 management in the clinic. The study was prematurely terminated after the enrollment of 50 participants without a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection: 25 were assigned to bromhexine hydrochloride treatment (8 mg 3 times per day), and 25 were controls. The composite primary endpoint was a positive nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2 or signs of clinical infection within 28 days and at week 8. Secondary endpoints included time from the first contact with a person with COVID-19 to the appearance of respiratory infection symptoms; the number of days before a first positive SARS-CoV-2 test; the number of asymptomatic participants with a positive nasopharyngeal swab test; the number of symptomatic COVID-19 cases; and adverse events.

Results: The rate of the combined primary endpoint did not differ significantly between the active treatment group (2/25 [8%]) and control group (7/25 [28%]); P=0.07. A fewer number of participants developed symptomatic COVID-19 in the treatment group compared to controls (0/25 vs. 5/25; P=0.02).

Conclusion: Although the study was underpowered, it showed that Bromhexine hydrochloride prophylaxis was associated with a reduced rate of symptomatic COVID-19. The prophylactic treatment was not associated with a lower combined primary endpoint rate, a positive swab PCR test, or COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04405999).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盐酸溴克辛预防医务人员COVID-19:一项随机开放标签研究
背景:盐酸溴己辛被认为是一种TMPRSS2蛋白酶阻滞剂,可以阻止SARS-CoV-2渗透到细胞中。我们旨在评估在积极参与确诊或疑似SARS-CoV-2感染患者的评估和治疗的医务人员中,定期摄入盐酸溴克辛对降低COVID-19风险的预防潜力。方法:采用单中心随机开放标签研究,招募管理COVID-19疑似和确诊患者的医务人员,随访8周。该研究始于临床COVID-19管理的开始。在50名没有SARS-CoV-2感染史的参与者入组后,该研究被提前终止:25名参与者被分配到盐酸溴甲辛治疗组(8mg,每天3次),25名作为对照组。复合主要终点是在28天和第8周内鼻咽拭子聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测中出现SARS-CoV-2阳性或临床感染迹象。次要终点包括从首次接触COVID-19患者到出现呼吸道感染症状的时间;第一次SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性前的天数;鼻咽拭子试验阳性的无症状参与者人数;COVID-19有症状病例数;以及不良事件。结果:联合主要终点率在积极治疗组(2/25[8%])和对照组(7/25[28%])之间无显著差异;P = 0.07。与对照组相比,治疗组出现症状性COVID-19的参与者人数较少(0/25 vs 5/25;P = 0.02)。结论:虽然这项研究的力度不足,但它表明盐酸溴克辛预防与降低症状性COVID-19发生率相关。预防性治疗与较低的综合主要终点率、阳性拭子PCR检测或COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT04405999)无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Monkeypox: Origin, Transmission, Clinical Manifestations, Prevention, and Therapeutic Options. Evaluation of Emerging Antimicrobials Resistance in Nosocomial Infections Caused by E. coli: The Comparison Results of Observed Cases and Compartmental Model. The Role of Obesity in the Poor Prognosis of COVID-19 Infection: A Review of 192 Patients Ebselen: A Promising Repurposing Drug to Treat Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Microorganisms Meningitis and Bacteremia by Unusual Serotype of Salmonella enterica Strain: A Whole Genome Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1