An Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Surgical Instructional Tool for Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Otolaryngology.

IF 17.7 1区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-13 DOI:10.1177/01455613211062447

Amy B De La Torre, Stephanie Joe, Victoria S Lee

{"title":"An Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Surgical Instructional Tool for Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches in Otolaryngology.","authors":"Amy B De La Torre, Stephanie Joe, Victoria S Lee","doi":"10.1177/01455613211062447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Online surgical videos are an increasingly popular resource for surgical trainees, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to assess the instructional quality of the YouTube videos of the transsphenoidal surgical approach (TSA), using LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS).Methods: YouTube TSA videos were searched using 5 keywords. Video characteristics were recorded. Two fellowship-trained rhinologists evaluated videos using LAP-VEGaS (scale 0 [worst] to 18 [best]).Results: The searches produced 43 unique, unduplicated videos for analysis. Mean video length 7 minutes (standard deviation [SD] = 13), mean viewership was 16 017 views (SD = 29 415), and mean total LAP-VEGaS score was 9 (SD = 3). The LAP-VEGaS criteria with the lowest mean scores were presentation of the positioning of the patient/surgical team (mean = 0.2; SD = 0.6) and the procedure outcomes (mean = 0.4; SD = 0.6). There was substantial interrater agreement (κ = 0.71).Conclusions: LAP-VEGaS, initially developed for laparoscopic procedures, is useful for evaluating TSA instructional videos. There is an opportunity to improve the quality of these videos.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"NP440-NP449"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211062447","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Online surgical videos are an increasingly popular resource for surgical trainees, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to assess the instructional quality of the YouTube videos of the transsphenoidal surgical approach (TSA), using LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational Guidelines (LAP-VEGaS).

Methods: YouTube TSA videos were searched using 5 keywords. Video characteristics were recorded. Two fellowship-trained rhinologists evaluated videos using LAP-VEGaS (scale 0 [worst] to 18 [best]).

Results: The searches produced 43 unique, unduplicated videos for analysis. Mean video length 7 minutes (standard deviation [SD] = 13), mean viewership was 16 017 views (SD = 29 415), and mean total LAP-VEGaS score was 9 (SD = 3). The LAP-VEGaS criteria with the lowest mean scores were presentation of the positioning of the patient/surgical team (mean = 0.2; SD = 0.6) and the procedure outcomes (mean = 0.4; SD = 0.6). There was substantial interrater agreement (κ = 0.71).

Conclusions: LAP-VEGaS, initially developed for laparoscopic procedures, is useful for evaluating TSA instructional videos. There is an opportunity to improve the quality of these videos.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

将 YouTube 视频作为耳鼻喉科内窥镜鼻腔内入路手术教学工具的评估。

目的：在线手术视频是一种越来越受外科学员欢迎的资源，尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行的背景下。我们的目的是利用《LAParoscopic surgery video educational guidelines》（LAP-VEGaS）评估经蝶窦手术入路（TSA）YouTube 视频的教学质量：方法：使用 5 个关键词搜索 YouTube 上的 TSA 视频。记录视频特征。两位接受过研究培训的鼻科专家使用 LAP-VEGaS 对视频进行了评估（评分从 0 [最差] 到 18 [最佳]）：结果：搜索到 43 个独特的、未重复的视频供分析。视频平均长度为 7 分钟（标准差 [SD] = 13），平均观看次数为 16 017 次（标准差 = 29 415），LAP-VEGaS 平均总分为 9 分（标准差 = 3）。平均得分最低的 LAP-VEGaS 标准是患者/手术团队定位的展示（平均 = 0.2；标度 = 0.6）和手术结果（平均 = 0.4；标度 = 0.6）。研究者之间的一致性很高（κ = 0.71）：LAP-VEGaS最初是为腹腔镜手术开发的，可用于评估TSA教学视频。我们有机会提高这些视频的质量。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合

CiteScore

31.40

自引率

1.10%

发文量

312

审稿时长

2 months

期刊介绍： Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.

期刊最新文献

Corrigendum to "Do All Isolated Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhages Need to Be Transferred to a Level 1 Trauma Center?" Function Decoupling and Modular Platform: Emerging Design Principles for MOF Luminescent Sensing. Issue Editorial Masthead Issue Publication Information Photon Avalanching Nanoparticles