Beyond Mood and Atmosphere: a Conceptual History of the Term Stimmung.

Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel) Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-27 DOI:10.1007/s11406-020-00290-7
Gerhard Thonhauser
{"title":"Beyond Mood and Atmosphere: a Conceptual History of the Term <i>Stimmung</i>.","authors":"Gerhard Thonhauser","doi":"10.1007/s11406-020-00290-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The last few years have seen increasing research interest in moods and atmospheres. While this trend has been accompanied by growing interest in the history of the word <i>Stimmung</i> in other disciplines, this has not yet been the case within philosophy. Against this background, this paper offers a conceptual history of the word <i>Stimmung</i>, focusing on the period from Kant to Heidegger, as this period is, presumably, less known to researchers working with notions like mood, attunement or atmosphere today. Thus, considering this period might provide conceptual resources not yet considered in current debate. <i>Stimmung</i> has the remarkable feature of encompassing the entire semantic field of mood and atmosphere, insofar as both subjects and objects can literally be in <i>Stimmung</i>. <i>Stimmung</i> might refer to the state or condition of being attuned, which is understood as a dispositional state, as well as the process or act of attuning, which includes self-activating and foreign-determined forms of attuning. The word was first used for the tuning of musical instruments, but was quickly transferred to the fields of aesthetics, psychology, and physiology. This paper will focus on the contrast between the psychological canonization of <i>Stimmung</i> as a type of mental state, and the use of <i>Stimmung</i> as an untranslatable, irreducible metaphor with unique semantic force allowing for original theorizing.</p>","PeriodicalId":74436,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel)","volume":"49 3","pages":"1247-1265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11406-020-00290-7","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia (Ramat-Gan, Israel)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00290-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The last few years have seen increasing research interest in moods and atmospheres. While this trend has been accompanied by growing interest in the history of the word Stimmung in other disciplines, this has not yet been the case within philosophy. Against this background, this paper offers a conceptual history of the word Stimmung, focusing on the period from Kant to Heidegger, as this period is, presumably, less known to researchers working with notions like mood, attunement or atmosphere today. Thus, considering this period might provide conceptual resources not yet considered in current debate. Stimmung has the remarkable feature of encompassing the entire semantic field of mood and atmosphere, insofar as both subjects and objects can literally be in Stimmung. Stimmung might refer to the state or condition of being attuned, which is understood as a dispositional state, as well as the process or act of attuning, which includes self-activating and foreign-determined forms of attuning. The word was first used for the tuning of musical instruments, but was quickly transferred to the fields of aesthetics, psychology, and physiology. This paper will focus on the contrast between the psychological canonization of Stimmung as a type of mental state, and the use of Stimmung as an untranslatable, irreducible metaphor with unique semantic force allowing for original theorizing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越情绪和气氛:刺激一词的概念史。
最近几年,人们对情绪和气氛的研究兴趣越来越大。虽然这一趋势伴随着其他学科对“刺激”一词的历史日益增长的兴趣,但在哲学领域还没有出现这种情况。在此背景下,本文提供了“刺激”一词的概念史,重点关注从康德到海德格尔的这段时期,因为这段时期可能对今天研究情绪、调谐或气氛等概念的研究人员来说鲜为人知。因此,审议这一时期可能提供目前辩论中尚未考虑到的概念资源。刺激的显著特点是包含了情绪和气氛的整个语义场,因为主语和宾语都可以在刺激中出现。刺激可能指的是被调谐的状态或条件,这被理解为一种气质状态,以及调谐的过程或行为,其中包括自我激活和外来决定的调谐形式。这个词最初用于乐器的调音,但很快就转移到美学、心理学和生理学领域。本文将重点讨论刺激作为一种心理状态的心理规范化与刺激作为一种不可翻译、不可还原的隐喻的使用之间的对比,这种隐喻具有独特的语义力量,可以进行原创的理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How AI Systems Can Be Blameworthy. W. Matthews Grant's Dual Sources Account and Ultimate Responsibility. Taxation in the COVID-19 Pandemic: to Pay or Not to Pay. The Value of Knowledge and Other Epistemic Standings: A Case for Epistemic Pluralism. The Conditional Analysis of the Agentive Modals: a Reply to Mandelkern et al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1