[Differences on postpartum family planning among nursing professionals.]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2022-02-03
María Avilés Martínez, María Carmen Sellán Soto, Juan José de la Cruz Troca
{"title":"[Differences on postpartum family planning among nursing professionals.]","authors":"María Avilés Martínez,&nbsp;María Carmen Sellán Soto,&nbsp;Juan José de la Cruz Troca","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In Spain, a total of 95,149 voluntary terminations of pregnancy (VTP) took place only in the year 2019, 90% of them requested by the woman, 53% of whom had at least one child. This situation highlights the relevance of postpartum family planning (PFP) and the work of the professionals in charge of its promotion. The aim of this study was to establish whether midwives and the rest of the nursing professionals regard PFP as an activity to perform within their professional role and how they implement it, as well as to identify their knowledge on it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study performed through an ad-hoc questionnaire between March 2017 and June 2019 in three groups of Nursing professionals dedicated to woman care (n=153) made up of: 1) Nurses specialized in Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing (Midwifery) of the Delivery suite Department; 2) midwives in Primary Care; 3) Nurses in Postpartum Unit from 3 different hospitals and 37 associated health centers. Analysis by labor group and the comparison of the different professional activities were performed through Pearson chi-squared test or a likelihood ratio, depending on sample size in qualitative variables, and in quantitative variables, by Kruskal-Wallis' test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Not all professionals regard PFP as an activity within their professional role, and there is no consensus regarding its implementation (P<0.001). Concerning their level of knowledge, there are differences among professionals regarding the timeframe when the woman should receive the information on PFP (P=0.002), only 13% of them know that PFP should be started from day 21 of postpartum, and although 95% of them know about the incompatibility of breastfeeding with some contraceptive methods, this knowledge is higher among midwives than among general nurses (P=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although midwives are the most aware and knowledgeable professionals on PFP, the responsibility of informing women on postpartum contraception does not always fall on them, and this situation could have an effect on the woman's health and reduce the incidence of unwanted pregnancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In Spain, a total of 95,149 voluntary terminations of pregnancy (VTP) took place only in the year 2019, 90% of them requested by the woman, 53% of whom had at least one child. This situation highlights the relevance of postpartum family planning (PFP) and the work of the professionals in charge of its promotion. The aim of this study was to establish whether midwives and the rest of the nursing professionals regard PFP as an activity to perform within their professional role and how they implement it, as well as to identify their knowledge on it.

Methods: Study performed through an ad-hoc questionnaire between March 2017 and June 2019 in three groups of Nursing professionals dedicated to woman care (n=153) made up of: 1) Nurses specialized in Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing (Midwifery) of the Delivery suite Department; 2) midwives in Primary Care; 3) Nurses in Postpartum Unit from 3 different hospitals and 37 associated health centers. Analysis by labor group and the comparison of the different professional activities were performed through Pearson chi-squared test or a likelihood ratio, depending on sample size in qualitative variables, and in quantitative variables, by Kruskal-Wallis' test.

Results: Not all professionals regard PFP as an activity within their professional role, and there is no consensus regarding its implementation (P<0.001). Concerning their level of knowledge, there are differences among professionals regarding the timeframe when the woman should receive the information on PFP (P=0.002), only 13% of them know that PFP should be started from day 21 of postpartum, and although 95% of them know about the incompatibility of breastfeeding with some contraceptive methods, this knowledge is higher among midwives than among general nurses (P=0.012).

Conclusions: Although midwives are the most aware and knowledgeable professionals on PFP, the responsibility of informing women on postpartum contraception does not always fall on them, and this situation could have an effect on the woman's health and reduce the incidence of unwanted pregnancies.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业人员产后计划生育的差异
目的:在西班牙,仅在2019年就发生了95149例自愿终止妊娠(VTP),其中90%是由妇女要求的,其中53%至少有一个孩子。这种情况突出了产后计划生育(PFP)的重要性以及负责促进这一工作的专业人员的工作。本研究的目的是确定助产士和其他护理专业人员是否将PFP视为其专业角色内的一项活动,以及他们如何实施它,以及确定他们对它的了解。方法:在2017年3月至2019年6月期间,通过临时问卷调查对三组专门从事女性护理的护理专业人员(n=153)进行研究,包括:1)产房部妇产科护理(助产)专业护士;2)初级保健助产士;3)来自3家不同医院和37家相关保健中心的产后护理护士。在定性变量上根据样本量采用Pearson卡方检验或似然比检验,在定量变量上根据样本量采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。结果:并非所有专业人员都将计划生育视为其职业职责范围内的一项活动,对计划生育的实施也没有达成共识(结论:尽管助产士是最了解和最了解计划生育的专业人员,但告知妇女产后避孕的责任并不总是落在他们身上,这种情况可能对妇女的健康产生影响,并减少意外怀孕的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Recommendations for the patient during the treatment of colorectal cancer through the enhanced recovery.] [Chemical pollution, exposome and health in the Canary Islands population: An assessment of the situation.] [World Breastfeeding Week 2022: a call for deliberation.] [COVID-19 exposure setting, social and gender determinants in a mediterranean region.] [Effect of prebiotics, probiotics, and symbiotics on molecular markers of inflammation in obesity.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1