Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia Risks of Photon Versus Proton Therapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients.

IF 2 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2021-04-07 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.14338/IJPT-20-00086
Saba Ebrahimi, Gino Lim, Amy Liu, Steven H Lin, Susannah G Ellsworth, Clemens Grassberger, Radhe Mohan, Wenhua Cao
{"title":"Radiation-Induced Lymphopenia Risks of Photon Versus Proton Therapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients.","authors":"Saba Ebrahimi,&nbsp;Gino Lim,&nbsp;Amy Liu,&nbsp;Steven H Lin,&nbsp;Susannah G Ellsworth,&nbsp;Clemens Grassberger,&nbsp;Radhe Mohan,&nbsp;Wenhua Cao","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-20-00086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess possible differences in radiation-induced lymphocyte depletion for esophageal cancer patients being treated with the following 3 treatment modalities: intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT), and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We used 2 prediction models to estimate lymphocyte depletion based on dose distributions. Model I used a piecewise linear relationship between lymphocyte survival and voxel-by-voxel dose. Model II assumes that lymphocytes deplete exponentially as a function of total delivered dose. The models can be fitted using the weekly absolute lymphocyte counts measurements collected throughout treatment. We randomly selected 45 esophageal cancer patients treated with IMRT, PSPT, or IMPT at our institution (15 per modality) to demonstrate the fitness of the 2 models. A different group of 10 esophageal cancer patients who had received PSPT were included in this study of in silico simulations of multiple modalities. One IMRT and one IMPT plan were created, using our standards of practice for each modality, as competing plans to the existing PSPT plan for each patient. We fitted the models by PSPT plans used in treatment and predicted absolute lymphocyte counts for IMRT and IMPT plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model validation on each modality group of patients showed good agreement between measured and predicted absolute lymphocyte counts nadirs with mean squared errors from 0.003 to 0.023 among the modalities and models. In the simulation study of IMRT and IMPT on the 10 PSPT patients, the average predicted absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadirs were 0.27, 0.35, and 0.37 K/μL after IMRT, PSPT, and IMPT treatments using Model I, respectively, and 0.14, 0.22, and 0.33 K/μL using Model II.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proton plans carried a lower predicted risk of lymphopenia after the treatment course than did photon plans. Moreover, IMPT plans outperformed PSPT in terms of predicted lymphocyte preservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"8 2","pages":"17-27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8489492/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-20-00086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Purpose: To assess possible differences in radiation-induced lymphocyte depletion for esophageal cancer patients being treated with the following 3 treatment modalities: intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT), and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

Methods and materials: We used 2 prediction models to estimate lymphocyte depletion based on dose distributions. Model I used a piecewise linear relationship between lymphocyte survival and voxel-by-voxel dose. Model II assumes that lymphocytes deplete exponentially as a function of total delivered dose. The models can be fitted using the weekly absolute lymphocyte counts measurements collected throughout treatment. We randomly selected 45 esophageal cancer patients treated with IMRT, PSPT, or IMPT at our institution (15 per modality) to demonstrate the fitness of the 2 models. A different group of 10 esophageal cancer patients who had received PSPT were included in this study of in silico simulations of multiple modalities. One IMRT and one IMPT plan were created, using our standards of practice for each modality, as competing plans to the existing PSPT plan for each patient. We fitted the models by PSPT plans used in treatment and predicted absolute lymphocyte counts for IMRT and IMPT plans.

Results: Model validation on each modality group of patients showed good agreement between measured and predicted absolute lymphocyte counts nadirs with mean squared errors from 0.003 to 0.023 among the modalities and models. In the simulation study of IMRT and IMPT on the 10 PSPT patients, the average predicted absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadirs were 0.27, 0.35, and 0.37 K/μL after IMRT, PSPT, and IMPT treatments using Model I, respectively, and 0.14, 0.22, and 0.33 K/μL using Model II.

Conclusions: Proton plans carried a lower predicted risk of lymphopenia after the treatment course than did photon plans. Moreover, IMPT plans outperformed PSPT in terms of predicted lymphocyte preservation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食管癌患者光子与质子治疗放射诱导淋巴细胞减少的风险。
目的:评估食管癌患者接受以下3种治疗方式:调强放疗(IMRT)、被动散射质子治疗(PSPT)和调强质子治疗(IMPT)后放射诱导淋巴细胞耗损的可能差异。方法与材料:采用2种基于剂量分布的预测模型估计淋巴细胞耗损。模型1使用淋巴细胞存活率与体素剂量之间的分段线性关系。模型II假设淋巴细胞作为总给药剂量的函数呈指数递减。模型可以使用整个治疗过程中收集的每周绝对淋巴细胞计数来拟合。我们在我院随机选择45例食管癌患者接受IMRT、PSPT或IMPT治疗(每种模式15例),以证明这两种模式的适合性。另一组10名接受PSPT治疗的食管癌患者被纳入了这项多模式的计算机模拟研究。一个IMRT和一个IMPT计划被创建,使用我们对每种模式的实践标准,作为每个患者现有PSPT计划的竞争计划。我们通过治疗中使用的PSPT计划拟合模型,并预测IMRT和IMPT计划的绝对淋巴细胞计数。结果:对每个模态组患者的模型验证显示,测量的绝对淋巴细胞计数最低点与预测的绝对淋巴细胞计数最低点之间的均方误差为0.003至0.023。在IMRT和IMPT对10例PSPT患者的模拟研究中,模型I预测IMRT、PSPT和IMPT治疗后的平均绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)最低点分别为0.27、0.35和0.37 K/μL,模型II预测的平均绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)最低点为0.14、0.22和0.33 K/μL。结论:质子计划治疗后淋巴细胞减少的预测风险低于光子计划。此外,在预测淋巴细胞保存方面,IMPT计划优于PSPT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Japanese Nationwide Prospective Data of Proton Therapy for Liver Metastasis From Pancreatic Cancer. Clinical White Paper From the "Hadrontherapy for Life" Symposium-Clinical Expansion of Carbon Ion Facilities Worldwide. Proton-Based Re-Irradiation of Locally Recurrent Pediatric Brain Tumors in Close Proximity to the Brainstem. Radiobiology Contributions and Perspectives in Hadron Therapy, With a Focus on Carbon Ions: Report From the Workshop Hadron Therapy for Life, Caen, March 2025. Editorial-A Milestone in the Technological Development of Hadrontherapy, in FranceHadrontherapy, cryogenic cyclotron.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1