The Advantage of Proton Therapy in Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis and Hippocampus Avoidance for Children with Medulloblastoma.

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Particle Therapy Pub Date : 2021-08-02 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14338/IJPT-21-00001.1
Saif Aljabab, Shushan Rana, Shadonna Maes, Avril O'Ryan-Blair, Jackie Castro, Jack Zheng, Lia M Halasz, Phillip J Taddei
{"title":"The Advantage of Proton Therapy in Hypothalamic-Pituitary Axis and Hippocampus Avoidance for Children with Medulloblastoma.","authors":"Saif Aljabab,&nbsp;Shushan Rana,&nbsp;Shadonna Maes,&nbsp;Avril O'Ryan-Blair,&nbsp;Jackie Castro,&nbsp;Jack Zheng,&nbsp;Lia M Halasz,&nbsp;Phillip J Taddei","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-21-00001.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) improves clinical outcomes at the cost of long-term neuroendocrine and cognitive sequelae. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) and hippocampus avoidance (HPA-HA) with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can potentially reduce this morbidity compared with standard x-ray CSI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 10 patients with medulloblastoma (mean, 7 years; range, 4-14 years). Target volumes and organs at risk were delineated as per our local protocol and the ACNS0331 atlas. An experienced neuroradiologist verified the HPA and hippocampus contours. The primary objective was CSI and boost clinical target volume (CTV) covering 95% of the volume (D<sub>95</sub>) > 99% coverage with robustness. Described proton therapy doses in grays are prescribed using a biological effectiveness relative to photon therapy of 1.1. The combined prescribed dose in the boost target was 54 Gy. Secondary objectives included the HPA and hippocampus composite average dose (D<sub>mean</sub> ≤ 18 Gy). For each patient, volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy (TOMO) plans existed previously, and a new plan was generated with 3 cranial and 1 or 2 spinal beams for pencil-beam scanning delivery. Statistical comparison was performed with 1-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with standard CSI, HPA-HA CSI had statistically significant decreases in the composite doses received by the HPA (32.2 versus 17.9 Gy; <i>P</i> < .001) and hippocampi (39.8 versus 22.8 Gy; <i>P</i> < .001). The composite HPA D<sub>mean</sub> was lower in IMPT plans (17.9 Gy) compared with that of VMAT (21.8 Gy) and TOMO (21.2 Gy) plans (<i>P</i> = .05). Hippocampi composite D<sub>mean</sub> was also lower in IMPT plans (21 Gy) compared with that of VMAT (27.5 Gy) and TOMO (27.2 Gy) plans (<i>P</i> = .02). The IMPT CTV D<sub>95</sub> coverage was lower in IMPT plans (52.8 Gy) compared with that of VMAT (54.6 Gy) and TOMO (54.6 Gy) plans (<i>P</i> < .001) The spared mean volume was only 1.35% (19.8 cm<sup>3</sup>) of the whole-brain CTV volume (1476 cm<sup>3</sup>).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that IMPT has the strong potential to reduce the dose to the HPA and hippocampus, compared with standard x-ray CSI while maintaining target coverage. A prospective clinical trial is required to establish the safety, efficacy, and toxicity of this novel CSI approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"8 3","pages":"43-54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8768900/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-21-00001.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) improves clinical outcomes at the cost of long-term neuroendocrine and cognitive sequelae. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA) and hippocampus avoidance (HPA-HA) with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) can potentially reduce this morbidity compared with standard x-ray CSI.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 10 patients with medulloblastoma (mean, 7 years; range, 4-14 years). Target volumes and organs at risk were delineated as per our local protocol and the ACNS0331 atlas. An experienced neuroradiologist verified the HPA and hippocampus contours. The primary objective was CSI and boost clinical target volume (CTV) covering 95% of the volume (D95) > 99% coverage with robustness. Described proton therapy doses in grays are prescribed using a biological effectiveness relative to photon therapy of 1.1. The combined prescribed dose in the boost target was 54 Gy. Secondary objectives included the HPA and hippocampus composite average dose (Dmean ≤ 18 Gy). For each patient, volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and tomotherapy (TOMO) plans existed previously, and a new plan was generated with 3 cranial and 1 or 2 spinal beams for pencil-beam scanning delivery. Statistical comparison was performed with 1-way analysis of variance.

Results: Compared with standard CSI, HPA-HA CSI had statistically significant decreases in the composite doses received by the HPA (32.2 versus 17.9 Gy; P < .001) and hippocampi (39.8 versus 22.8 Gy; P < .001). The composite HPA Dmean was lower in IMPT plans (17.9 Gy) compared with that of VMAT (21.8 Gy) and TOMO (21.2 Gy) plans (P = .05). Hippocampi composite Dmean was also lower in IMPT plans (21 Gy) compared with that of VMAT (27.5 Gy) and TOMO (27.2 Gy) plans (P = .02). The IMPT CTV D95 coverage was lower in IMPT plans (52.8 Gy) compared with that of VMAT (54.6 Gy) and TOMO (54.6 Gy) plans (P < .001) The spared mean volume was only 1.35% (19.8 cm3) of the whole-brain CTV volume (1476 cm3).

Conclusion: We found that IMPT has the strong potential to reduce the dose to the HPA and hippocampus, compared with standard x-ray CSI while maintaining target coverage. A prospective clinical trial is required to establish the safety, efficacy, and toxicity of this novel CSI approach.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小儿髓母细胞瘤质子治疗下丘脑-垂体轴及海马回避的优势。
目的:颅脊髓照射(CSI)以长期神经内分泌和认知后遗症为代价改善临床结果。本初步研究的目的是确定与标准x射线CSI相比,下丘脑-垂体轴(HPA)和海马回避(HPA- ha)结合强度调节质子治疗(IMPT)是否可以潜在地降低这种发病率。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估了10例髓母细胞瘤患者(平均7岁;范围:4-14年)。靶体积和有危险的器官根据我们的本地方案和ACNS0331地图集进行划定。一位经验丰富的神经放射学家证实了下丘脑和海马体的轮廓。主要目标是CSI和提高临床靶体积(CTV),覆盖95%的体积(D95),稳健性覆盖率> 99%。描述的灰色质子治疗剂量是使用相对于光子治疗1.1的生物有效性来规定的。增强靶的联合规定剂量为54 Gy。次要指标包括HPA和海马复合平均剂量(Dmean≤18 Gy)。对于每个患者,先前存在体积调制电弧放疗(VMAT)和断层治疗(TOMO)计划,并且产生了一个新的计划,即3个颅骨和1或2个脊柱束用于铅笔束扫描递送。采用单因素方差分析进行统计学比较。结果:与标准CSI相比,HPA- ha CSI在HPA接受的复合剂量上有统计学意义的降低(32.2 Gy vs 17.9 Gy;IMPT方案的P均值(17.9 Gy)低于VMAT方案(21.8 Gy)和TOMO方案(21.2 Gy) (P = 0.05)。IMPT组海马复合Dmean (21 Gy)低于VMAT组(27.5 Gy)和TOMO组(27.2 Gy) (P = 0.02)。IMPT方案的IMPT CTV D95覆盖率(52.8 Gy)低于全脑CTV体积(1476 cm3)的VMAT (54.6 Gy)和TOMO (54.6 Gy)方案(p3)。结论:我们发现,与标准x线CSI相比,IMPT在保持靶覆盖的同时,具有降低HPA和海马剂量的强大潜力。需要一项前瞻性临床试验来确定这种新型CSI方法的安全性、有效性和毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Carbon-Ion Radiation Therapy in Japan: A Japanese National Registry Study. The Level of Circulating M-MDSCs as an Indicator for the Therapeutic Outcome of BNCT in End-Stage Malignant Brain Tumor Patients. Vaginal Mucosal Melanoma Cell Activation in Response to Photon or Carbon Ion Irradiation. Navigating a New Frontier: Evaluating Leadless Pacemakers in Proton Therapy. Cardiac Conduction System as an OAR in Radiation Therapy: Doses to SA/AV Nodes and Their Reduction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1