Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography Imaging for COVID-19 in a Region with Low Disease Prevalence.

IF 1.1 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE Pub Date : 2022-03-25 Epub Date: 2021-11-11 DOI:10.2302/kjm.2021-0012-OA
Ho Lee, Tatsuya Suzuki, Yohei Okada, Hiromu Tanaka, Satoshi Okamori, Hirofumi Kamata, Makoto Ishii, Masahiro Jinzaki, Koichi Fukunaga
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography Imaging for COVID-19 in a Region with Low Disease Prevalence.","authors":"Ho Lee,&nbsp;Tatsuya Suzuki,&nbsp;Yohei Okada,&nbsp;Hiromu Tanaka,&nbsp;Satoshi Okamori,&nbsp;Hirofumi Kamata,&nbsp;Makoto Ishii,&nbsp;Masahiro Jinzaki,&nbsp;Koichi Fukunaga","doi":"10.2302/kjm.2021-0012-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 as an outbreak of pneumonia of unknown origin. Previous studies have suggested the utility of chest computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of COVID-19 because of its high sensitivity (93%-97%), relatively simple procedure, and rapid test results. This study, performed in Japan early in the epidemic when COVID-19 prevalence was low, evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT in a population presenting with lung diseases having CT findings similar to those of COVID-19. We retrospectively included all consecutive patients (≥18 years old) presenting to the outpatient department of Keio University Hospital between March 1 and May 31, 2020, with fever and respiratory symptoms. We evaluated the performance of diagnostic CT for COVID-19 by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results as the reference standard. We determined the numbers of false-positive (FP) results and assessed the clinical utility using decision curve analysis. Of the 175 patients, 22 were PCR-positive. CT had a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 57%. Patients with FP results on CT diagnosis were mainly diagnosed with diseases mimicking COVID-19, e.g., interstitial lung disease. Decision curve analysis indicated that the clinical utility of CT imaging was limited. The diagnostic performance of CT for COVID-19 was inadequate in an area with low COVID-19 prevalence and a high prevalence of other lung diseases with chest CT findings similar to those of COVID-19. Considering this insufficient diagnostic performance, CT findings should be evaluated in the context of additional medical information to diagnose COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":46245,"journal":{"name":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2302/kjm.2021-0012-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 as an outbreak of pneumonia of unknown origin. Previous studies have suggested the utility of chest computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of COVID-19 because of its high sensitivity (93%-97%), relatively simple procedure, and rapid test results. This study, performed in Japan early in the epidemic when COVID-19 prevalence was low, evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT in a population presenting with lung diseases having CT findings similar to those of COVID-19. We retrospectively included all consecutive patients (≥18 years old) presenting to the outpatient department of Keio University Hospital between March 1 and May 31, 2020, with fever and respiratory symptoms. We evaluated the performance of diagnostic CT for COVID-19 by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results as the reference standard. We determined the numbers of false-positive (FP) results and assessed the clinical utility using decision curve analysis. Of the 175 patients, 22 were PCR-positive. CT had a sensitivity of 68% and a specificity of 57%. Patients with FP results on CT diagnosis were mainly diagnosed with diseases mimicking COVID-19, e.g., interstitial lung disease. Decision curve analysis indicated that the clinical utility of CT imaging was limited. The diagnostic performance of CT for COVID-19 was inadequate in an area with low COVID-19 prevalence and a high prevalence of other lung diseases with chest CT findings similar to those of COVID-19. Considering this insufficient diagnostic performance, CT findings should be evaluated in the context of additional medical information to diagnose COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机断层成像对低患病率地区COVID-19的诊断效果
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)于2019年12月在中国武汉首次报道,是一场来源不明的肺炎疫情。此前的研究表明,胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)在诊断COVID-19方面具有实用价值,因为它的灵敏度高(93%-97%),程序相对简单,检测结果快速。这项研究是在疫情早期的日本进行的,当时COVID-19的患病率很低,评估了胸部CT在CT表现与COVID-19相似的肺部疾病人群中的诊断准确性。我们回顾性地纳入了2020年3月1日至5月31日期间在庆应义塾大学医院门诊部出现发热和呼吸道症状的所有连续患者(≥18岁)。我们以聚合酶链反应(PCR)结果作为参考标准,评价CT诊断COVID-19的性能。我们确定假阳性(FP)结果的数量,并使用决策曲线分析评估临床效用。175例患者中,22例pcr阳性。CT敏感度68%,特异度57%。CT诊断FP结果的患者主要诊断为与COVID-19相似的疾病,如间质性肺疾病。决策曲线分析表明,CT成像的临床应用有限。在COVID-19低流行率和其他肺部疾病高流行率且胸部CT表现与COVID-19相似的地区,CT对COVID-19的诊断性能不足。考虑到这一不足的诊断性能,应结合其他医学信息对CT结果进行评估,以诊断COVID-19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
KEIO JOURNAL OF MEDICINE MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Intravenous Regeneration-associated Cell Transplantation Enhances Tissue Recovery in Mice with Acute Ischemic Stroke. Warfarin Therapy and Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure for a Patient with Atrial Fibrillation and Antithrombin-III Deficiency. Efficacy of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Cognition in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Robotic Lobectomy with a Single Robotic Stapler from One 12-mm Port: A Multi-institutional Study. Incidence of Radiation-induced Nausea and Vomiting: A Prospective Single-institution Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1