Shaima Alothman, Aqeel M Alenazi, Mohammed M Alshehri, Joseph LeMaster, John Thyfault, Jason Rucker, Patricia M Kluding
{"title":"Sedentary Behavior Counseling Intervention in Aging People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Shaima Alothman, Aqeel M Alenazi, Mohammed M Alshehri, Joseph LeMaster, John Thyfault, Jason Rucker, Patricia M Kluding","doi":"10.1177/11795514211040540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the feasibility and effect of sedentary behavior (SB) counseling on total sitting time (TST) and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Community-dwelling sedentary adults with T2D (n = 10; 8 women; age 65.6 ± 7.31) completed SB counseling (motivational interviewing-informed education about SB) aided by an activity monitor with a vibrotactile feature (activPAL3TM). The monitor was worn for 7 days, on weeks 1 and 13 (without the vibrotactile feature) and during weeks 5 and 9 (with the vibrotactile feature). Intervention feasibility was determined by study retention rates and activity monitor tolerability, and differences between pre- and post-intervention average daily TST. Paired <i>t</i>-test were performed. The effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen <i>d</i>. All participants attended all study sessions with only 20% reporting moderate issues tolerating the activity monitor. TST time decreased from 11.8 hours ± 1.76 at baseline to 10.29 hours ± 1.84 at 3 months' assessment (<i>P</i> < .05) with a large ES (Cohen <i>d</i> = .88). HbA1c was decreased by 0.51% (<i>P</i> < .05) at the end of the intervention. This study found that the intervention was feasible for sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"14 ","pages":"11795514211040540"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/78/10.1177_11795514211040540.PMC8580491.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514211040540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
This study examined the feasibility and effect of sedentary behavior (SB) counseling on total sitting time (TST) and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Community-dwelling sedentary adults with T2D (n = 10; 8 women; age 65.6 ± 7.31) completed SB counseling (motivational interviewing-informed education about SB) aided by an activity monitor with a vibrotactile feature (activPAL3TM). The monitor was worn for 7 days, on weeks 1 and 13 (without the vibrotactile feature) and during weeks 5 and 9 (with the vibrotactile feature). Intervention feasibility was determined by study retention rates and activity monitor tolerability, and differences between pre- and post-intervention average daily TST. Paired t-test were performed. The effect size (ES) was calculated using Cohen d. All participants attended all study sessions with only 20% reporting moderate issues tolerating the activity monitor. TST time decreased from 11.8 hours ± 1.76 at baseline to 10.29 hours ± 1.84 at 3 months' assessment (P < .05) with a large ES (Cohen d = .88). HbA1c was decreased by 0.51% (P < .05) at the end of the intervention. This study found that the intervention was feasible for sedentary adults with type 2 diabetes.