Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a tertiary hospital in Nepal.

IF 1.3 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Public Health Action Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.5588/pha.21.0042
P Pradhan, P Rajbhandari, S B Nagaraja, P Shrestha, R Grigoryan, S Satyanarayana, H Davtyan
{"title":"Prevalence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in a tertiary hospital in Nepal.","authors":"P Pradhan,&nbsp;P Rajbhandari,&nbsp;S B Nagaraja,&nbsp;P Shrestha,&nbsp;R Grigoryan,&nbsp;S Satyanarayana,&nbsp;H Davtyan","doi":"10.5588/pha.21.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Setting: </strong>Patan Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe 1) the prevalence of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern; 2) the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with MRSA infections; and 3) the treatment outcomes of in-patients with MRSA infection among patients with <i>S. aureus</i> infection between January 2018 and December 2020.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study using electronic and paper-based hospital records of patients with <i>S. aureus</i> infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,804 patients with <i>S. aureus</i> infection<i>,</i> 1,027 patients (57%, 95% CI 55-59) had MRSA. The MRSA were susceptible to vancomycin (100%), linezolid (96%), doxycycline (96%), chloramphenicol (86%) and cotrimoxazole (70%), and resistant to erythromycin (68%), clindamycin (56%), gentamycin (58%), ciprofloxacin (92%) and ofloxacin (91%). The prevalence of MRSA was higher in 2019, among out-patients, and in respiratory samples, and lower in blood samples. Of the 142 in-patients with MRSA, 93% had a successful clinical outcome (cured/improved).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More than 50% of patients with <i>S. aureus</i> infection had MRSA that were resistant to commonly available antibiotics. This calls for strengthening surveil-lance and good infection control practices in this hospital.</p>","PeriodicalId":46239,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Action","volume":"11 Suppl 1","pages":"46-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575383/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/pha.21.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Setting: Patan Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal.

Objectives: To describe 1) the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern; 2) the demographic and clinical characteristics associated with MRSA infections; and 3) the treatment outcomes of in-patients with MRSA infection among patients with S. aureus infection between January 2018 and December 2020.

Design: This was a cross-sectional study using electronic and paper-based hospital records of patients with S. aureus infection.

Results: Of the 1,804 patients with S. aureus infection, 1,027 patients (57%, 95% CI 55-59) had MRSA. The MRSA were susceptible to vancomycin (100%), linezolid (96%), doxycycline (96%), chloramphenicol (86%) and cotrimoxazole (70%), and resistant to erythromycin (68%), clindamycin (56%), gentamycin (58%), ciprofloxacin (92%) and ofloxacin (91%). The prevalence of MRSA was higher in 2019, among out-patients, and in respiratory samples, and lower in blood samples. Of the 142 in-patients with MRSA, 93% had a successful clinical outcome (cured/improved).

Conclusion: More than 50% of patients with S. aureus infection had MRSA that were resistant to commonly available antibiotics. This calls for strengthening surveil-lance and good infection control practices in this hospital.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔一家三级医院耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的流行情况。
地点:尼泊尔拉利特普尔帕坦医院。目的:了解1)耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的流行情况及其抗生素敏感性;2)与MRSA感染相关的人口学和临床特征;3) 2018年1月至2020年12月金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者中MRSA感染住院患者的治疗结果。设计:这是一项横断面研究,使用了金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者的电子和纸质医院记录。结果:1804例金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者中,1027例(57%,95% CI 55-59)有MRSA。MRSA对万古霉素(100%)、利奈唑胺(96%)、多西环素(96%)、氯霉素(86%)、复方新诺明(70%)敏感,对红霉素(68%)、克林霉素(56%)、庆大霉素(58%)、环丙沙星(92%)、氧氟沙星(91%)耐药。2019年,MRSA在门诊患者和呼吸道样本中的患病率较高,而血液样本中的患病率较低。在142例MRSA住院患者中,93%有成功的临床结果(治愈/改善)。结论:50%以上的金黄色葡萄球菌感染患者存在对常用抗生素耐药的MRSA。这就要求在该医院加强监测和良好的感染控制措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Action
Public Health Action RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Launched on 1 May 2011, Public Health Action (PHA) is an official publication of the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union). It is an open access, online journal available world-wide to physicians, health workers, researchers, professors, students and decision-makers, including public health centres, medical, university and pharmaceutical libraries, hospitals, clinics, foundations and institutions. PHA is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that actively encourages, communicates and reports new knowledge, dialogue and controversy in health systems and services for people in vulnerable and resource-limited communities — all topics that reflect the mission of The Union, Health solutions for the poor.
期刊最新文献
TB burden and diagnostic challenges at Sandaun Provincial Hospital in West Sepik Province of PNG, 2016-2021. TB-related technical enquiries received at the Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan, during COVID-19. Continuous quality improvement in a community-wide TB screening and prevention programme in Papua New Guinea. Effects of extrapulmonary TB on patient quality of life and recurrence. Impact of Truenat on TB diagnosis in Nigeria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1