A pilot study of the implementation and evaluation of a leadership program for medical undergraduate students: Lessons learned.

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Education for Health Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.4103/1357-6283.332959
Sumita Sethi, Suresh Chari, Henal Shah, Ruchi Agarwal, Ruchi Dabas, Renu Garg
{"title":"A pilot study of the implementation and evaluation of a leadership program for medical undergraduate students: Lessons learned.","authors":"Sumita Sethi,&nbsp;Suresh Chari,&nbsp;Henal Shah,&nbsp;Ruchi Agarwal,&nbsp;Ruchi Dabas,&nbsp;Renu Garg","doi":"10.4103/1357-6283.332959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most Indian medical schools lack formal leadership training though students are expected to evolve into leaders. The Student Leadership Program (SLP) was designed and evaluated with an objective to incorporate and strengthen leadership skills in undergraduates and to initiate change in organizational practice through the development of a Student Leadership Society.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The SLP was designed using best evidence guidelines in medical education. Competencies and learning outcomes were identified in four domains: reflective writing, self-management, team management, and experiential learning. A stepwise program was implemented over 6 months in which participants wrote reflections at the end of each program session. So as to gain objective evidence of behavioral change in participants in relation to the leadership training, their reflections were qualitatively analyzed and corresponding codes and themes were derived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We describe the content and stepwise process of implementation of our pilot leadership program, which included 24 final-year students. Results of qualitative analysis are presented in relation to the domains of self-management, team management, and evaluation of experimental learning. Among the findings were: students viewed assertive skills training as the most powerful learning experience within self-management, and in team management, the session on \"Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for understanding one's own leadership style\" was seen as the most powerful learning tool, while the session on conflict management was the most difficult in this domain. A Student Leadership Society was instituted.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In this study, students' reflections helped us better understand factors (the \"how\" and \"why\") that make leadership training more effective. The SLP, with a strong evidence base, achieved the intended learning outcomes. A Student Leadership Society was constituted as a networking platform to explore the long-term effects of leadership training on organizational practice. The content and process of our pilot leadership program and lessons learned through understanding of students' perspectives should be applicable to subsequent iterations of student leadership development programs here and in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46742,"journal":{"name":"Education for Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.332959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Most Indian medical schools lack formal leadership training though students are expected to evolve into leaders. The Student Leadership Program (SLP) was designed and evaluated with an objective to incorporate and strengthen leadership skills in undergraduates and to initiate change in organizational practice through the development of a Student Leadership Society.

Methods: The SLP was designed using best evidence guidelines in medical education. Competencies and learning outcomes were identified in four domains: reflective writing, self-management, team management, and experiential learning. A stepwise program was implemented over 6 months in which participants wrote reflections at the end of each program session. So as to gain objective evidence of behavioral change in participants in relation to the leadership training, their reflections were qualitatively analyzed and corresponding codes and themes were derived.

Results: We describe the content and stepwise process of implementation of our pilot leadership program, which included 24 final-year students. Results of qualitative analysis are presented in relation to the domains of self-management, team management, and evaluation of experimental learning. Among the findings were: students viewed assertive skills training as the most powerful learning experience within self-management, and in team management, the session on "Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for understanding one's own leadership style" was seen as the most powerful learning tool, while the session on conflict management was the most difficult in this domain. A Student Leadership Society was instituted.

Discussion: In this study, students' reflections helped us better understand factors (the "how" and "why") that make leadership training more effective. The SLP, with a strong evidence base, achieved the intended learning outcomes. A Student Leadership Society was constituted as a networking platform to explore the long-term effects of leadership training on organizational practice. The content and process of our pilot leadership program and lessons learned through understanding of students' perspectives should be applicable to subsequent iterations of student leadership development programs here and in other settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学本科生领导力项目实施与评估的试点研究:经验教训。
背景:大多数印度医学院缺乏正式的领导力培训,尽管学生有望成为领导者。学生领导能力项目(SLP)的设计和评估的目标是整合和加强大学生的领导能力,并通过发展学生领导能力协会在组织实践中发起变革。方法:采用医学教育最佳证据指南设计SLP。能力和学习成果在四个领域被确定:反思性写作、自我管理、团队管理和体验学习。在6个月的时间里,一个循序渐进的项目被实施,参与者在每个项目结束时写下自己的感想。为了获得与领导力培训相关的参与者行为变化的客观证据,我们对他们的反思进行定性分析,并得出相应的代码和主题。结果:我们描述了我们的试点领导力项目的内容和逐步实施的过程,其中包括24名大四学生。在自我管理、团队管理和实验学习评估方面,提出了定性分析的结果。结果发现:学生认为自信技能训练是自我管理中最有效的学习经验,在团队管理中,“了解自己领导风格的迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标”被视为最有效的学习工具,而冲突管理课程是该领域最难的。学生领导协会成立了。讨论:在这项研究中,学生的反思帮助我们更好地理解了使领导力培训更有效的因素(“如何”和“为什么”)。SLP以强有力的证据为基础,达到了预期的学习效果。我们成立了学生领导力协会,作为一个网络平台,探讨领导力培训对组织实践的长期影响。我们的试点领导力项目的内容和过程,以及通过理解学生的观点而获得的经验教训,应该适用于这里和其他环境下的学生领导力发展项目的后续迭代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Health
Education for Health EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice (EfH) is the scholarly, peer-reviewed journal of The Network: Towards Unity for Health. Our readers are health professionals, health professions educators and learners, health care researchers, policymakers, community leaders and administrators from all over the world. We publish original studies, reviews, think pieces, works in progress and commentaries on current trends, issues, and controversies. We especially want to provide our international readers with fresh ideas and innovative models of education and health services that can enable them to be maximally responsive to the healthcare needs of the communities in which they work and learn.
期刊最新文献
The Way Forward for Integrated Health Sciences Degree Programs Education about Planetary Health and Sustainable Healthcare in low- and middle-income countries: Planetary Health Report Card assessment of perceptions at University of Cape Town Faculty of Health Sciences Lessons learned in development of vision and mission statements How do Educational Staff and Students in a Medical School Perceive Social Accountability? A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Interview Study Thank you, Michael Glasser!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1