Hemodynamic Management of Patients with Ejection Fraction < 50% Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Ablation.

Aaron B Hesselson, Heather Hesselson
{"title":"Hemodynamic Management of Patients with Ejection Fraction < 50% Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Ablation.","authors":"Aaron B Hesselson,&nbsp;Heather Hesselson","doi":"10.4022/jafib.20200439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is no consensus regarding optimal methodology forblood pressure monitoring inpatients with a depressed ejection fraction undergoingcatheter ablationfor atrial fibrillation. Our goalswere to determine ifhemodynamicmanagementdifferences exist during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with and without an ejection fraction< 50%, and whether management was influenced by the utilization of invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. This single-center trial retrospectively compared blood pressure management during catheterablation of atrial fibrillationin all patients with an ejection fraction< 50% over a 2-year span (n=44), and compared to an age-matched cohort with preserved ejection fraction ablated over the same span in time (n=44). Blood pressure was not significantly managed differently between the groups, and did not appear to be influenced by the use of invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring.Hemodynamic management is similar across the spectrum of ejection fraction, regardless of invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, which challenges the need for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoringduringcatheter ablation ofatrial fibrillationin left ventricular systolic dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"13 6","pages":"20200439"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691288/pdf/jafib-13-20200439.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.20200439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no consensus regarding optimal methodology forblood pressure monitoring inpatients with a depressed ejection fraction undergoingcatheter ablationfor atrial fibrillation. Our goalswere to determine ifhemodynamicmanagementdifferences exist during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with and without an ejection fraction< 50%, and whether management was influenced by the utilization of invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring. This single-center trial retrospectively compared blood pressure management during catheterablation of atrial fibrillationin all patients with an ejection fraction< 50% over a 2-year span (n=44), and compared to an age-matched cohort with preserved ejection fraction ablated over the same span in time (n=44). Blood pressure was not significantly managed differently between the groups, and did not appear to be influenced by the use of invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring.Hemodynamic management is similar across the spectrum of ejection fraction, regardless of invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring, which challenges the need for invasive arterial blood pressure monitoringduringcatheter ablation ofatrial fibrillationin left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺静脉消融术中射血分数<50%患者的血液动力学管理。
对于心房颤动消融后射血分数降低的住院患者血压监测的最佳方法,目前还没有达成共识。我们的目标是确定射血分数<50%和未射血分数>50%的心房颤动患者在射频消融术期间是否存在血液动力学管理差异,以及有创动脉血压监测的使用是否影响管理。这项单中心试验回顾性比较了2年内射血分数<50%的所有患者(n=44)在心房原纤维导管消融期间的血压管理,并与在相同时间段内消融射血分数保持的年龄匹配队列进行了比较(n=44。两组之间的血压管理没有显著差异,并且似乎不受有创动脉血压监测的影响。在射血分数范围内的血液动力学管理是相似的,而不考虑有创动脉血压监测,这挑战了在左心室收缩功能障碍的试验纤维消融过程中对有创动脉压力监测的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of atrial fibrillation
Journal of atrial fibrillation Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare and the use of robotic technology - The Robotic Magnetic Navigation, to manage them in the field of electrophysiology | A single-center experience with case studies Atrial Fibrillation with Controlled Ventricular Rate and New-onset Heart Failure: Atypical Presentation, Worse Prognosis Psychological Stress Associated – Vagally Mediated Atrial Fibrillation: Personal Observation of a Possible Subtype Long-Term Rhythm and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After DC Cardioversion For for Atrial Fibrillation Association Between New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1