DEFINING THE MEDICAL RECORD: RELATIONSHIPS OF THE LEGAL MEDICAL RECORD, THE DESIGNATED RECORD SET, AND THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD.

Phyllis T Floyd, Jim C Oates, Julie W Acker, Robert W Warren
{"title":"DEFINING THE MEDICAL RECORD: RELATIONSHIPS OF THE LEGAL MEDICAL RECORD, THE DESIGNATED RECORD SET, AND THE ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD.","authors":"Phyllis T Floyd,&nbsp;Jim C Oates,&nbsp;Julie W Acker,&nbsp;Robert W Warren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Not so long ago, defining the \"medical record\" was simple. It was the paper chart-volume upon volume that captured the serial, dutifully recorded events of a person's health care at a hospital or physician's office. Entries were typically handwritten, dated and timed, and signed in ink with title (i.e., authenticated). Errors were easily identified by an authenticated strike-through. Similarly, the paper chart was synonymous with the legal medical record (LMR). In other words, a patient's paper chart was that patient's LMR by definition, even if critical data was omitted or irrelevant data was included. Fast-forward to 2021 and the use of technology for capturing the record of a patient's care. Technology has brought new challenges as well as successes. For example, pervasive and persistent mythologies include that 1) a patient's electronic health record (EHR) is the LMR, and 2) patient-specific EHR printouts to paper or disc-or displays on monitors-are necessarily equivalents to the paper chart of the 1980s. Neither are true. We now must define at the outset what is included in the LMR/designated record set to ensure the accuracy of what is retained and released.</p>","PeriodicalId":40052,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649704/pdf/phim0018-0001h.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in health information management / AHIMA, American Health Information Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Not so long ago, defining the "medical record" was simple. It was the paper chart-volume upon volume that captured the serial, dutifully recorded events of a person's health care at a hospital or physician's office. Entries were typically handwritten, dated and timed, and signed in ink with title (i.e., authenticated). Errors were easily identified by an authenticated strike-through. Similarly, the paper chart was synonymous with the legal medical record (LMR). In other words, a patient's paper chart was that patient's LMR by definition, even if critical data was omitted or irrelevant data was included. Fast-forward to 2021 and the use of technology for capturing the record of a patient's care. Technology has brought new challenges as well as successes. For example, pervasive and persistent mythologies include that 1) a patient's electronic health record (EHR) is the LMR, and 2) patient-specific EHR printouts to paper or disc-or displays on monitors-are necessarily equivalents to the paper chart of the 1980s. Neither are true. We now must define at the outset what is included in the LMR/designated record set to ensure the accuracy of what is retained and released.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定义病案:法定病案、指定病案集和电子病案的关系。
不久前,定义“医疗记录”还很简单。这是一卷接一卷的纸质图表,它记录了一个人在医院或医生办公室里连续、尽职尽责地记录的医疗事件。条目通常是手写的,注明日期和时间,并以带有标题的墨水签名(即经过认证)。错误很容易通过经过验证的穿透识别出来。同样,纸质病历也是法律医疗记录(LMR)的同义词。换句话说,即使忽略了关键数据或包含了无关数据,患者的纸质图表也就是患者的LMR。快进到2021年,利用技术捕捉患者的护理记录。技术在带来成功的同时也带来了新的挑战。例如,普遍和持久的神话包括:1)患者的电子健康记录(EHR)是LMR,以及2)打印到纸上或磁盘上(或显示器上显示)的特定于患者的EHR必须等同于20世纪80年代的纸质图表。两者都不对。我们现在必须在一开始就定义LMR/指定记录集中包含的内容,以确保保留和发布的内容的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Health Information Management is a scholarly, peer-reviewed research journal whose mission is to advance health information management practice and to encourage interdisciplinary collaboration between HIM professionals and others in disciplines supporting the advancement of the management of health information. The primary focus is to promote the linkage of practice, education, and research and to provide contributions to the understanding or improvement of health information management processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
The Role of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Preventing Stroke in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Best Practices for the Design of COVID-19 Dashboards. Medical Scribes: Symptom or Cause of Impeded Evolution of a Transformative Artificial Intelligence in the Electronic Health Record? Risk of Duplicate ICD Codes for Orthopedic and Injury Related Research. Quality Assessment of the Road Traffic Health and Safety Apps with a Focus on the Five Rights of Information Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1