Levetiracetam as an Adjunctive Treatment for Mania: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychobiology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-03 DOI:10.1159/000520457
Amir Keshavarzi, Aziz Sharifi, Leila Jahangard, Alireza Soltanian, Annette Beatrix Brühl, Mohammad Ahmadpanah, Serge Brand
{"title":"Levetiracetam as an Adjunctive Treatment for Mania: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Amir Keshavarzi, Aziz Sharifi, Leila Jahangard, Alireza Soltanian, Annette Beatrix Brühl, Mohammad Ahmadpanah, Serge Brand","doi":"10.1159/000520457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levetiracetam is an anticonvulsant with a low side effect profile and favorable properties for individuals with bipolar I disorder during their manic phase. Despite initial promising results until about 2008, it appears that this track of research has not been followed-up. To counter this, we tested the influence of adjuvant levetiracetam on acute mania, compared to placebo. More specifically, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial among inpatients with bipolar disorder I during their acute phase of mania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 72 inpatients (mean age: 33.98 years; 23.6% females) with diagnosed bipolar disorder I and during their acute manic phase were randomly assigned either to the adjuvant levetiracetam (250 mg to a maximum of 1,500 mg) or to the placebo condition. Standard medication was lithium at therapeutic dosages. At baseline, participants completed a series of self-rating questionnaires covering sociodemographic information and subjective sleep. Subjective sleep was re-assessed 24 days later at the end of the study. Experts rated participants' acute state of mania with the Young Mania Rating Scale at baseline and at day 12 and day 24. Participants' cognitive performance was assessed at baseline and at day 24 at the end of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over time, mania scores significantly decreased (large effect size), but more so in the levetiracetam condition, compared to the placebo condition (medium effect size). Likewise, over time, subjective sleep improved (large effect size), but more so in the levetiracetam condition, compared to the placebo condition (large effect size). Over time, cognitive performance improved (large effect size), irrespective of the study condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to placebo, adjuvant levetiracetam to lithium improved symptoms of mania, as rated by experts, and subjective sleep quality. Adjuvant levetiracetam had no further favorable (or detrimental) impact on cognitive performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19239,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychobiology","volume":"81 3","pages":"192-203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9227682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychobiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000520457","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Levetiracetam is an anticonvulsant with a low side effect profile and favorable properties for individuals with bipolar I disorder during their manic phase. Despite initial promising results until about 2008, it appears that this track of research has not been followed-up. To counter this, we tested the influence of adjuvant levetiracetam on acute mania, compared to placebo. More specifically, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial among inpatients with bipolar disorder I during their acute phase of mania.

Methods: A total of 72 inpatients (mean age: 33.98 years; 23.6% females) with diagnosed bipolar disorder I and during their acute manic phase were randomly assigned either to the adjuvant levetiracetam (250 mg to a maximum of 1,500 mg) or to the placebo condition. Standard medication was lithium at therapeutic dosages. At baseline, participants completed a series of self-rating questionnaires covering sociodemographic information and subjective sleep. Subjective sleep was re-assessed 24 days later at the end of the study. Experts rated participants' acute state of mania with the Young Mania Rating Scale at baseline and at day 12 and day 24. Participants' cognitive performance was assessed at baseline and at day 24 at the end of the study.

Results: Over time, mania scores significantly decreased (large effect size), but more so in the levetiracetam condition, compared to the placebo condition (medium effect size). Likewise, over time, subjective sleep improved (large effect size), but more so in the levetiracetam condition, compared to the placebo condition (large effect size). Over time, cognitive performance improved (large effect size), irrespective of the study condition.

Conclusions: Compared to placebo, adjuvant levetiracetam to lithium improved symptoms of mania, as rated by experts, and subjective sleep quality. Adjuvant levetiracetam had no further favorable (or detrimental) impact on cognitive performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左乙拉西坦作为躁狂症的辅助治疗:双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
背景介绍左乙拉西坦是一种抗惊厥药,副作用小,对处于躁狂期的躁狂 I 型双相情感障碍患者很有帮助。尽管直到 2008 年才取得了初步的可喜成果,但这一研究方向似乎并未得到跟进。为此,我们测试了与安慰剂相比,左乙拉西坦辅助药物对急性躁狂症的影响。更具体地说,我们在躁狂症急性期的躁狂症 I 型双相情感障碍住院患者中开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验:共有 72 名确诊为双相情感障碍 I 的住院患者(平均年龄:33.98 岁;23.6% 为女性)在急性躁狂期被随机分配到左乙拉西坦辅助药物(250 毫克至最高 1,500 毫克)或安慰剂治疗方案中。标准药物为治疗剂量的锂。在基线期,参与者填写了一系列自我评分问卷,内容包括社会人口学信息和主观睡眠情况。24 天后,在研究结束时再次对主观睡眠进行评估。专家们在基线期、第 12 天和第 24 天使用 Young 躁狂症评分量表对参与者的急性躁狂症状态进行评分。在基线和研究结束后的第24天,对参与者的认知能力进行评估:随着时间的推移,躁狂评分明显下降(大效应量),但与安慰剂相比,左乙拉西坦治疗条件下的躁狂评分下降更明显(中效应量)。同样,随着时间的推移,主观睡眠也有所改善(大效应量级),但与安慰剂相比,左乙拉西坦治疗组的主观睡眠改善程度更大(大效应量级)。随着时间的推移,认知能力得到改善(大效应量),与研究条件无关:与安慰剂相比,锂辅助左乙拉西坦能改善专家评定的躁狂症症状和主观睡眠质量。结论:与安慰剂相比,左乙拉西坦辅助锂剂可改善专家评定的躁狂症症状和主观睡眠质量,但对认知能力没有进一步的有利(或不利)影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychobiology
Neuropsychobiology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The biological approach to mental disorders continues to yield innovative findings of clinical importance, particularly if methodologies are combined. This journal collects high quality empirical studies from various experimental and clinical approaches in the fields of Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychology and Neuropsychology. It features original, clinical and basic research in the fields of neurophysiology and functional imaging, neuropharmacology and neurochemistry, neuroendocrinology and neuroimmunology, genetics and their relationships with normal psychology and psychopathology. In addition, the reader will find studies on animal models of mental disorders and therapeutic interventions, and pharmacoelectroencephalographic studies. Regular reviews report new methodologic approaches, and selected case reports provide hints for future research. ''Neuropsychobiology'' is a complete record of strategies and methodologies employed to study the biological basis of mental functions including their interactions with psychological and social factors.
期刊最新文献
Adverse Childhood Experiences are associated with Mental Health Problems later in life: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Lithium - Fifteen Years Later. Gut microbiome in impulsively violent female convicts. Light Exposure on Alertness after Wake-Up in Healthy Men: Comparing Dim, Bright, Red, and Blue Light. Copy Number Variation Analysis of Aggressive Behaviour in Schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1