Valproic acid could help in the fight against COVID-19: A case–control study

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologia Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nrl.2022.01.007
{"title":"Valproic acid could help in the fight against COVID-19: A case–control study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nrl.2022.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>There is early evidence about Valproic acid (VPA) antiviral effect. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in VPA users as compared with the general population.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A case-control study nested within a cohort, carried out between March 1 and December 17, 2020. Retrospectively, we identified confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection patients exposed to VPA in our health department (defined as case). We ascertained VPA regimen (all the time (AT) (292 days) or at least 20% of the study period (notAT) (≥58 days) and if VPA levels were in therapeutic range (ATR) (50–100<!--> <!-->mcg/mL) in the last 24 months. We calculated the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission in the cases, comparing it with the general unexposed VPA population (controls).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During the study period, 6183 PCR+ were detected among 281,035 inhabitants, of these, 746 were hospitalized. 691 patients were on VPA notAT and 628 (90.1%) AT. The indication for VPA use was epilepsy in 54.9%. The incidence of PCR+ was 1.736% (OR 0.785 (95%CI 0.443–1.390) and 1.910% (OR 0.865 (95%CI 0.488–1.533), on VPA notAT and VPA AT patients, respectively vs. 2.201% in people without VPA regimen. Those patients with VPA ATR had a lower risk of PCR + (OR 0.233 (95%CI 0.057–0.951) notAT; OR 0.218 (95%CI 0.053–0.890) AT). Hospital admission incidence was lower in patient on VPA (OR was 0.543 (95% CI 0.076–3.871).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients with VPA within the therapeutic range had a reduction of SARS-Cov-2 infection incidence greater than 75%. There is a downward trend in the risk of COVID-19 admission by SARS-CoV-2 in patients on VPA therapy. These findings warrant further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19300,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":"39 7","pages":"Pages 549-554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8841207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213485322000147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

There is early evidence about Valproic acid (VPA) antiviral effect. Our aim was to investigate the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection in VPA users as compared with the general population.

Material and methods

A case-control study nested within a cohort, carried out between March 1 and December 17, 2020. Retrospectively, we identified confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection patients exposed to VPA in our health department (defined as case). We ascertained VPA regimen (all the time (AT) (292 days) or at least 20% of the study period (notAT) (≥58 days) and if VPA levels were in therapeutic range (ATR) (50–100 mcg/mL) in the last 24 months. We calculated the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospital admission in the cases, comparing it with the general unexposed VPA population (controls).

Results

During the study period, 6183 PCR+ were detected among 281,035 inhabitants, of these, 746 were hospitalized. 691 patients were on VPA notAT and 628 (90.1%) AT. The indication for VPA use was epilepsy in 54.9%. The incidence of PCR+ was 1.736% (OR 0.785 (95%CI 0.443–1.390) and 1.910% (OR 0.865 (95%CI 0.488–1.533), on VPA notAT and VPA AT patients, respectively vs. 2.201% in people without VPA regimen. Those patients with VPA ATR had a lower risk of PCR + (OR 0.233 (95%CI 0.057–0.951) notAT; OR 0.218 (95%CI 0.053–0.890) AT). Hospital admission incidence was lower in patient on VPA (OR was 0.543 (95% CI 0.076–3.871).

Conclusion

Patients with VPA within the therapeutic range had a reduction of SARS-Cov-2 infection incidence greater than 75%. There is a downward trend in the risk of COVID-19 admission by SARS-CoV-2 in patients on VPA therapy. These findings warrant further investigation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[丙戊酸有助于对抗 COVID-19:一项病例对照研究]。
目的:有早期证据表明丙戊酸(VPA)具有抗病毒作用。我们的目的是调查与普通人群相比,VPA使用者感染SARS-CoV-2的发生率和严重程度:在 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 12 月 17 日期间进行的一项病例对照研究。我们回顾性地确定了在卫生部门接触过 VPA 的确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染者(定义为病例)。我们确定了 VPA 方案(全部时间(AT)(292 天)或研究期间至少 20% 的时间(notAT)(≥58 天)),以及过去 24 个月中 VPA 水平是否在治疗范围(ATR)(50-100 mcg/mL)内。我们计算了病例中 SARS-CoV-2 感染和入院的累积发病率,并将其与未接触过 VPA 的一般人群(对照组)进行了比较:在研究期间,281035 名居民中有 6183 人检测出 PCR+,其中 746 人住院治疗。691 名患者使用 VPA(非抗生素),628 名(90.1%)使用抗生素。54.9%的患者使用 VPA 的适应症是癫痫。VPA notAT 和 VPA AT 患者的 PCR+ 发生率分别为 1.736%(OR 0.785(95%CI 0.443-1.390))和 1.910%(OR 0.865(95%CI 0.488-1.533)),而未使用 VPA 方案的患者的 PCR+ 发生率为 2.201%。使用 VPA ATR 的患者 PCR + 的风险较低(非 AT OR 0.233(95%CI 0.057-0.951);AT OR 0.218(95%CI 0.053-0.890))。服用VPA的患者入院率较低(OR为0.543(95% CI为0.076至3.871)):结论:在治疗范围内使用 VPA 的患者的 SARS-Cov-2 感染率降低了 75% 以上。接受 VPA 治疗的患者因 SARS-CoV-2 感染 COVID-19 的风险呈下降趋势。这些发现值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia
Neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
135
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Neurología es la revista oficial de la Sociedad Española de Neurología y publica, desde 1986 contribuciones científicas en el campo de la neurología clínica y experimental. Los contenidos de Neurología abarcan desde la neuroepidemiología, la clínica neurológica, la gestión y asistencia neurológica y la terapéutica, a la investigación básica en neurociencias aplicada a la neurología. Las áreas temáticas de la revistas incluyen la neurologia infantil, la neuropsicología, la neurorehabilitación y la neurogeriatría. Los artículos publicados en Neurología siguen un proceso de revisión por doble ciego a fin de que los trabajos sean seleccionados atendiendo a su calidad, originalidad e interés y así estén sometidos a un proceso de mejora. El formato de artículos incluye Editoriales, Originales, Revisiones y Cartas al Editor, Neurología es el vehículo de información científica de reconocida calidad en profesionales interesados en la neurología que utilizan el español, como demuestra su inclusión en los más prestigiosos y selectivos índices bibliográficos del mundo.
期刊最新文献
Síndrome de trombosis con trombocitopenia asociado a vacunas de adenovirus frente a la COVID-19: Epidemiología y presentación clínica de la serie española Validación de Neuromyotype: un teclado inteligente para la evaluación de pacientes con atrofia muscular espinal 5q Test cognitivos breves como herramienta de decisión en Atención Primaria. Estudio poblacional y de validación Estudio CORCOBIA: determinación de puntos de corte de biomarcadores de enfermedad de Alzheimer en LCR en una cohorte clínica Insomnio fatal esporádico: fenotipo PSP-like rápidamente progresivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1