Ethnic Disparities in Coronavirus Disease 2019 after the Implementation of Universal Screening in Hartford, Connecticut.

IF 0.8 Q4 PEDIATRICS AJP Reports Pub Date : 2021-12-22 eCollection Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740562
Veronica Maria Pimentel, Frank Ian Jackson, Anthony Dino Ferrante, Reinaldo Figueroa
{"title":"Ethnic Disparities in Coronavirus Disease 2019 after the Implementation of Universal Screening in Hartford, Connecticut.","authors":"Veronica Maria Pimentel,&nbsp;Frank Ian Jackson,&nbsp;Anthony Dino Ferrante,&nbsp;Reinaldo Figueroa","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  The aim of this article was to estimate the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Connecticut, examine racial/ethnic disparities, and assess pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women following the implementation of universal screening for the virus. <b>Materials and methods</b>  This is a retrospective cohort study of all obstetric patients admitted to our labor and delivery unit during the first 4 weeks of implementation of universal screening of COVID-19. Viral studies were performed in all neonates born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We calculated the prevalence of COVID-19, compared the baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes between those who tested positive and negative for the virus, and determined the factors associated with COVID-19. <b>Results</b>  A total of 10 (4.6%) of 220 women screened positive for the virus. All were asymptomatic. Week 1 had the highest prevalence of infection, nearing 8%. No neonates were infected. Hispanics were more likely to test positive (odds ratio: 10.23; confidence interval: [2.71-49.1], <i>p</i>  = 0.001). Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were similar between the groups ( <i>p</i>  > 0.05). <b>Conclusion</b>  Although the rate of asymptomatic COVID-19 was low, ethnic disparities were present with Hispanics being more likely to have the infection. <b>Key Points</b> 4.6% of pregnant women in labor and delivery tested positive for COVID-19 while being asymptomatic.Hispanic women were more likely to test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.Pregnancy outcomes were similar between COVID-19 positive and negative women.No vertical transmission was detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":7645,"journal":{"name":"AJP Reports","volume":"11 4","pages":"e147-e153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/9e/10-1055-s-0041-1740562.PMC8695059.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJP Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740562","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective  The aim of this article was to estimate the prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Connecticut, examine racial/ethnic disparities, and assess pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women following the implementation of universal screening for the virus. Materials and methods  This is a retrospective cohort study of all obstetric patients admitted to our labor and delivery unit during the first 4 weeks of implementation of universal screening of COVID-19. Viral studies were performed in all neonates born to mothers with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. We calculated the prevalence of COVID-19, compared the baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes between those who tested positive and negative for the virus, and determined the factors associated with COVID-19. Results  A total of 10 (4.6%) of 220 women screened positive for the virus. All were asymptomatic. Week 1 had the highest prevalence of infection, nearing 8%. No neonates were infected. Hispanics were more likely to test positive (odds ratio: 10.23; confidence interval: [2.71-49.1], p  = 0.001). Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were similar between the groups ( p  > 0.05). Conclusion  Although the rate of asymptomatic COVID-19 was low, ethnic disparities were present with Hispanics being more likely to have the infection. Key Points 4.6% of pregnant women in labor and delivery tested positive for COVID-19 while being asymptomatic.Hispanic women were more likely to test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.Pregnancy outcomes were similar between COVID-19 positive and negative women.No vertical transmission was detected.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康涅狄格州哈特福德实施普遍筛查后2019年冠状病毒病的种族差异
目的估计康涅狄格州2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的患病率,检查种族/民族差异,并评估实施该病毒普遍筛查后孕妇的妊娠结局。材料和方法本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入在实施COVID-19普遍筛查的头4周内入住我们产业部的所有产科患者。对患有严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的母亲所生的所有新生儿进行了病毒研究。我们计算了COVID-19的患病率,比较了病毒检测呈阳性和阴性的患者的基线特征和妊娠结局,并确定了与COVID-19相关的因素。结果220名妇女中有10人(4.6%)呈阳性。所有患者均无症状。第一周的感染率最高,接近8%。没有新生儿感染。西班牙裔更有可能检测出阳性(优势比:10.23;置信区间:[2.71-49.1],p = 0.001)。两组间产科和新生儿结局相似(p > 0.05)。结论无症状感染者比例较低,但存在种族差异,拉美裔感染者比例较高。无症状分娩的孕妇新冠病毒检测呈阳性,占4.6%。西班牙裔女性更有可能检测出严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒阳性。COVID-19阳性和阴性妇女的妊娠结局相似。没有检测到垂直传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJP Reports
AJP Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
" Trying to Grab Pieces of Hope " : Exploring the Experiences of Black and Hispanic Parents following a Congenital Heart Disease Diagnosis. The Effect of Prolonged Antenatal Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Preventing Gestational Alloimmune Liver Disease-A Case Series with Literature Review. A Rare Case of Fetal Neural Tube Defect; Iniencephaly Clausus. Human Milk-Derived Fortifier to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Malnutrition in Uncomplicated Gastroschisis: A Case Report. Corrigendum: The Collection and Application of Autologous Amniotic Fluid to Cesarean Delivery Closure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1