A clinical trial comparing BiVap (Richard Wolf®) saline vaporization of the prostate vs. TwisterTM Diode Laser System in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction between prostate volume 90 to 150 ml.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-31 DOI:10.1177/00369330211072262
Ayhan Karakose, Yasin Yitgin
{"title":"A clinical trial comparing BiVap (Richard Wolf®) saline vaporization of the prostate vs. Twister<sup>TM</sup> Diode Laser System in the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction between prostate volume 90 to 150 ml.","authors":"Ayhan Karakose,&nbsp;Yasin Yitgin","doi":"10.1177/00369330211072262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy, safety and postoperative outcomes of the BiVap and Twister systems with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) in prostate volüm between 90-150 ml.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, we included 131 patients treated with BiVap system (n = 68) and Twister system (n = 63). Postoperative complications including urinary tract infection, transient hematuria, severe dysuria and fever >38° C, urinary incontinence and urethral stricture were also noted. All patients were evaluated at the postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month and preoperative and postoperative values of IPSS score, QoL score, total PSA, IIEF 15, PVR, Qmax and Qave were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Preoperative demographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. There was observed significant improvement for IPSS, Qmax, Qave, PVR, and QoL score by the postoperative first month compared to the preoperative values in both groups. Maximum improvement in the IPSS, Qmax, Qave, QoL score and PVR were achieved at postoperative 6, 3, 12, 3 and 12th months respectively in group 1. In group 2 maximum improvement in the same parameters were achieved at postoperative 6, 3, 6, 6 and 12th months, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BiVap and Twister systems are safe, effective, and useful technique, which can be used in the surgical treatment of BPO between 90-150 ml.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"67 1","pages":"38-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211072262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and postoperative outcomes of the BiVap and Twister systems with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) in prostate volüm between 90-150 ml.

Methods: In total, we included 131 patients treated with BiVap system (n = 68) and Twister system (n = 63). Postoperative complications including urinary tract infection, transient hematuria, severe dysuria and fever >38° C, urinary incontinence and urethral stricture were also noted. All patients were evaluated at the postoperative 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month and preoperative and postoperative values of IPSS score, QoL score, total PSA, IIEF 15, PVR, Qmax and Qave were compared.

Results: Preoperative demographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. There was observed significant improvement for IPSS, Qmax, Qave, PVR, and QoL score by the postoperative first month compared to the preoperative values in both groups. Maximum improvement in the IPSS, Qmax, Qave, QoL score and PVR were achieved at postoperative 6, 3, 12, 3 and 12th months respectively in group 1. In group 2 maximum improvement in the same parameters were achieved at postoperative 6, 3, 6, 6 and 12th months, respectively.

Conclusions: BiVap and Twister systems are safe, effective, and useful technique, which can be used in the surgical treatment of BPO between 90-150 ml.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项比较BiVap (Richard Wolf®)前列腺生理盐水汽化与TwisterTM二极管激光系统治疗前列腺容积90 ~ 150ml良性前列腺阻塞的临床试验。
目的:评价BiVap和Twister系统治疗前列腺volm在90-150 ml之间良性前列腺阻塞(BPO)患者的疗效、安全性和术后预后。方法:共纳入BiVap系统(n = 68)和Twister系统(n = 63)治疗的131例患者。术后出现尿路感染、一过性血尿、严重排尿困难、发热>38℃、尿失禁、尿道狭窄等并发症。于术后第1、3、6、12个月评估患者的IPSS评分、QoL评分、总PSA、IIEF 15、PVR、Qmax、Qave的术前、术后值。结果:两组患者术前人口学特征相似。术后第一个月,两组患者的IPSS、Qmax、Qave、PVR和QoL评分均较术前有显著改善。第一组IPSS、Qmax、Qave、QoL评分和PVR分别在术后6、3、12、3和12个月达到最大改善。在第二组中,相同参数的最大改善分别在术后6、3、6、6和12个月。结论:BiVap和Twister系统是一种安全、有效、实用的技术,可用于90 ~ 150ml BPO的手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Gender disparities in adult patients undergoing emergency appendicectomy: A comparative analysis. Routine preoperative blood group and save is unnecessary for adult emergency appendicectomies: A retrospective multicentre study. Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1