Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review.

Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty Pub Date : 2021-06-25 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24715492211028025
Sachin Allahabadi, Edward C Cheung, Jonathan D Hodax, Brian T Feeley, Chunbong B Ma, Drew A Lansdown
{"title":"Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sachin Allahabadi,&nbsp;Edward C Cheung,&nbsp;Jonathan D Hodax,&nbsp;Brian T Feeley,&nbsp;Chunbong B Ma,&nbsp;Drew A Lansdown","doi":"10.1177/24715492211028025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent reports have shown that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA) may be a safe alternative to inpatient management in appropriately selected patients. The purpose was to review the literature reporting on outpatient SA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of publications on outpatient SA was performed. Included publications discussed patients who were discharged on the same calendar day or within 23 hours from surgery. Articles were categorized by discussions on complications, readmissions, and safety, patient selection, pain management strategies, cost effectiveness, and patient and surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six articles were included. Patients undergoing outpatient SA were younger and with a lower BMI than those undergoing inpatient SA. Larger database studies reported more medical complications for patients undergoing inpatient compared to outpatient SA. Articles on pain management strategies discussed both single shot and continuous interscalene blocks with similar outcomes. Both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction following outpatient SA, and cost analysis studies demonstrated significant cost savings for outpatient SA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In appropriately selected patients, outpatient SA can be a safe, cost-saving alternative to inpatient care and may lead to high satisfaction of both patients and physicians, though further studies are needed to clarify appropriate utilization of outpatient SA.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/24715492211028025","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492211028025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective: Recent reports have shown that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA) may be a safe alternative to inpatient management in appropriately selected patients. The purpose was to review the literature reporting on outpatient SA.

Methods: A systematic review of publications on outpatient SA was performed. Included publications discussed patients who were discharged on the same calendar day or within 23 hours from surgery. Articles were categorized by discussions on complications, readmissions, and safety, patient selection, pain management strategies, cost effectiveness, and patient and surgeon satisfaction.

Results: Twenty-six articles were included. Patients undergoing outpatient SA were younger and with a lower BMI than those undergoing inpatient SA. Larger database studies reported more medical complications for patients undergoing inpatient compared to outpatient SA. Articles on pain management strategies discussed both single shot and continuous interscalene blocks with similar outcomes. Both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction following outpatient SA, and cost analysis studies demonstrated significant cost savings for outpatient SA.

Conclusion: In appropriately selected patients, outpatient SA can be a safe, cost-saving alternative to inpatient care and may lead to high satisfaction of both patients and physicians, though further studies are needed to clarify appropriate utilization of outpatient SA.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊肩关节置换术:系统综述。
目的:最近的报道表明,在适当选择的患者中,门诊肩关节置换术(SA)可能是一种安全的替代住院治疗的方法。目的是回顾门诊SA的文献报道。方法:系统回顾门诊SA的相关文献。纳入的出版物讨论了在同一天或手术后23小时内出院的患者。文章根据并发症、再入院、安全性、患者选择、疼痛管理策略、成本效益以及患者和外科医生满意度的讨论进行分类。结果:纳入26篇文献。接受门诊SA的患者比接受住院SA的患者更年轻,BMI更低。较大的数据库研究报告了住院患者与门诊患者相比有更多的医疗并发症。关于疼痛管理策略的文章讨论了单次注射和连续斜角肌间阻滞的相似结果。患者和外科医生都报告了门诊SA后的高满意度,成本分析研究表明门诊SA显著节省了成本。结论:在适当选择的患者中,门诊SA可以是一种安全,节省成本的住院治疗替代方案,并且可能导致患者和医生的高满意度,尽管需要进一步的研究来明确门诊SA的适当使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Locked Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Complex Proximal Humerus Fracture in the Elderly: Clinical and Radiological Short-Term Results. Corticosteroid Infiltration to Treat Shoulder Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair. Modified Weaver Dunn Versus Ligamentous Reconstruction Grafts in Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies. Short-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Bone Versus Metallic Augmented, Central Screw Type Baseplate in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Matched Case-Control Study. Distal Clavicular Resection Worsens Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Repair: A National Database Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1