2BALANCE: Test-retest reliability of a cognitive-motor dual-task protocol.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/VES-210069
Maya Danneels, Ruth Van Hecke, Laura Leyssens, Dirk Cambier, Raymond van de Berg, Laura Van de Velde, Vincent Van Rompaey, Leen Maes
{"title":"2BALANCE: Test-retest reliability of a cognitive-motor dual-task protocol.","authors":"Maya Danneels,&nbsp;Ruth Van Hecke,&nbsp;Laura Leyssens,&nbsp;Dirk Cambier,&nbsp;Raymond van de Berg,&nbsp;Laura Van de Velde,&nbsp;Vincent Van Rompaey,&nbsp;Leen Maes","doi":"10.3233/VES-210069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Aside from typical symptoms such as dizziness and vertigo, persons with vestibular disorders often have cognitive and motor problems. These symptoms have been assessed in single-task condition. However, dual-tasks assessing cognitive-motor interference might be an added value as they reflect daily life situations better. Therefore, the 2BALANCE protocol was developed. In the current study, the test-retest reliability of this protocol was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2BALANCE protocol was performed twice in 20 healthy young adults with an in-between test interval of two weeks. Two motor tasks and five different cognitive tasks were performed in single and dual-task condition. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement, and the minimal detectable difference were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All cognitive tasks, with the exception of the mental rotation task, had favorable reliability results (0.26≤ICC≤0.91). The dynamic motor task indicated overall substantial reliability values in all conditions (0.67≤ICC≤0.98). Similar results were found for the static motor task during dual-tasking (0.50≤ICC≤0.92), but were slightly lower in single-task condition (-0.26≤ICC≤0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2BALANCE protocol was overall consistent across trials. However, the mental rotation task showed lowest reliability values.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-210069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Aside from typical symptoms such as dizziness and vertigo, persons with vestibular disorders often have cognitive and motor problems. These symptoms have been assessed in single-task condition. However, dual-tasks assessing cognitive-motor interference might be an added value as they reflect daily life situations better. Therefore, the 2BALANCE protocol was developed. In the current study, the test-retest reliability of this protocol was assessed.

Methods: The 2BALANCE protocol was performed twice in 20 healthy young adults with an in-between test interval of two weeks. Two motor tasks and five different cognitive tasks were performed in single and dual-task condition. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), the standard error of measurement, and the minimal detectable difference were calculated.

Results: All cognitive tasks, with the exception of the mental rotation task, had favorable reliability results (0.26≤ICC≤0.91). The dynamic motor task indicated overall substantial reliability values in all conditions (0.67≤ICC≤0.98). Similar results were found for the static motor task during dual-tasking (0.50≤ICC≤0.92), but were slightly lower in single-task condition (-0.26≤ICC≤0.75).

Conclusions: The 2BALANCE protocol was overall consistent across trials. However, the mental rotation task showed lowest reliability values.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
balance:认知-运动双任务协议的重测信度。
目的:除了头晕和眩晕等典型症状外,前庭疾病患者通常有认知和运动问题。这些症状是在单任务条件下评估的。然而,评估认知运动干扰的双重任务可能是一个附加价值,因为它们能更好地反映日常生活情况。因此,开发了2BALANCE协议。在本研究中,评估了该方案的重测信度。方法:在20名健康年轻人中进行了两次2BALANCE方案,两次之间的测试间隔为两周。在单任务和双任务条件下分别进行2项运动任务和5项不同的认知任务。计算类内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差和最小可检测差异。结果:除心理旋转任务外,所有认知任务的信度结果均较好(0.26≤ICC≤0.91)。动态运动任务在所有条件下均具有总体可观的信度值(0.67≤ICC≤0.98)。静态运动任务在双任务条件下的结果相似(0.50≤ICC≤0.92),而单任务条件下的结果略低(-0.26≤ICC≤0.75)。结论:2BALANCE方案在各试验中总体上是一致的。而心理旋转任务的信度值最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
期刊最新文献
Vestibular migraine as a mimic of benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo and Meniere's disease. Effects of monaural sound stimulation on subjective visual vertical. Simulator sickness among helicopter pilots: Incidence, threshold and severity using the SSQ. The vestibular symptomatology of Machado-Joseph Disease. Is vestibular function related to human hippocampal volume?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1