Clinical diagnostic utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in parotid masses.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1177/01455613211058922
Amr F Hamour, Dan O'Connell, Vincent L Biron, Michael Allegretto, Robert Seemann, Jeffrey R Harris, Hadi Seikaly, David W J Côté
{"title":"Clinical diagnostic utility of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in parotid masses.","authors":"Amr F Hamour, Dan O'Connell, Vincent L Biron, Michael Allegretto, Robert Seemann, Jeffrey R Harris, Hadi Seikaly, David W J Côté","doi":"10.1177/01455613211058922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a common diagnostic tool used in the initial evaluation of parotid masses. In the literature, variable diagnostic accuracy of FNA is reported. Therefore, when considering clinical management of these patients, the utility of FNA is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the capability of ultrasound-guided FNA to differentiate between benign and malignant neoplasms. Further, the way in which FNA results affect clinical decision-making was assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data were collected for all patients who underwent parotidectomy at a large Canadian tertiary care center between 2011 and 2016. Patient demographics, preoperative imaging reports, preoperative FNA results, and final pathological diagnosis were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 199 patients who underwent parotidectomy, 184 had preoperative ultrasound-guided FNA. There were a total of 13 non-diagnostic FNAs. In diagnosing malignancy, FNA had a sensitivity and specificity of 71.4% and 98.7%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.3%. The negative predictive value was 97.5%. Of the non-diagnostic FNAs, 2 out of 13 (15.4%) were deemed malignant neoplasms on final pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FNA is a useful adjunct in the work-up of parotid masses, but it should be used with caution. Due to limited sensitivity, it should not be relied upon as the sole determinant of a surgeon's management plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":51041,"journal":{"name":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01455613211058922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a common diagnostic tool used in the initial evaluation of parotid masses. In the literature, variable diagnostic accuracy of FNA is reported. Therefore, when considering clinical management of these patients, the utility of FNA is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the capability of ultrasound-guided FNA to differentiate between benign and malignant neoplasms. Further, the way in which FNA results affect clinical decision-making was assessed.

Methods: Retrospective data were collected for all patients who underwent parotidectomy at a large Canadian tertiary care center between 2011 and 2016. Patient demographics, preoperative imaging reports, preoperative FNA results, and final pathological diagnosis were analyzed.

Results: Of the 199 patients who underwent parotidectomy, 184 had preoperative ultrasound-guided FNA. There were a total of 13 non-diagnostic FNAs. In diagnosing malignancy, FNA had a sensitivity and specificity of 71.4% and 98.7%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.3%. The negative predictive value was 97.5%. Of the non-diagnostic FNAs, 2 out of 13 (15.4%) were deemed malignant neoplasms on final pathology.

Conclusion: FNA is a useful adjunct in the work-up of parotid masses, but it should be used with caution. Due to limited sensitivity, it should not be relied upon as the sole determinant of a surgeon's management plan.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下腮腺肿块细针穿刺活检的临床诊断效用。
背景:细针穿刺术(FNA)是初步评估腮腺肿块的常用诊断工具。据文献报道,FNA 的诊断准确性参差不齐。因此,在考虑对这些患者进行临床治疗时,FNA 的效用尚不明确。本研究旨在确定超声引导下 FNA 区分良性和恶性肿瘤的能力。此外,还对 FNA 结果如何影响临床决策进行了评估:收集了2011年至2016年期间在加拿大一家大型三级医疗中心接受腮腺切除术的所有患者的回顾性数据。对患者的人口统计学特征、术前影像学报告、术前 FNA 结果和最终病理诊断进行了分析:在接受腮腺切除术的199名患者中,184名患者术前在超声引导下进行了FNA检查。共有 13 例 FNA 无法确诊。在诊断恶性肿瘤方面,FNA的敏感性和特异性分别为71.4%和98.7%。阳性预测值(PPV)为 83.3%。阴性预测值为 97.5%。在无法确诊的 FNA 中,13 例中有 2 例(15.4%)最终病理结果被认为是恶性肿瘤:结论:FNA 是腮腺肿块检查的有效辅助手段,但应谨慎使用。结论:FNA 是腮腺肿块检查的有用辅助手段,但应谨慎使用,由于灵敏度有限,不应将其作为外科医生管理计划的唯一决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal
Ent-Ear Nose & Throat Journal 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
385
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ear, Nose & Throat Journal provides practical, peer-reviewed original clinical articles, highlighting scientific research relevant to clinical care, and case reports that describe unusual entities or innovative approaches to treatment and case management. ENT Journal utilizes multiple channels to deliver authoritative and timely content that informs, engages, and shapes the industry now and into the future.
期刊最新文献
Myositis Ossificans of the Trapezius Muscle: A Case Report and Literature Review. Clinical Characteristics of Children with Nasal BCOR-Rearranged Ewing-like Sarcoma: A Case Report and Literature Review. Resection of Huge Nasal Septal Chondroma Via Endoscopic Septoplasty Approach Through Modified Killian Incision. The Evaluation of Vertigo in Children: Which Role for Parental-Camera Recording and Telemedicine? Sinonasal Plasmablastic Lymphoma Arising in the Setting of Recurrent Nasal Polyposis in an Immunocompetent Individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1