Recognising complexity: Foregrounding vulnerable and diverse populations for inclusive health information management research.

Bronwyn Hemsley, Deborah Debono
{"title":"Recognising complexity: Foregrounding vulnerable and diverse populations for inclusive health information management research.","authors":"Bronwyn Hemsley, Deborah Debono","doi":"10.1177/18333583211052708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good access to and management of high-quality health information is essential for people with disabilities and/or multiple health conditions. This includes access to information about health and personally held information that can be stored and shared across their health providers (Hemsley et al. 2016). Public digital health technologies (e.g., blogs and websites, social media, and mobile technology apps) as well as personally-controlled electronic health records should help people with disabilities and multiple health conditions make better use of health information and engage in storing and sharing that information at critical points in their health pathway. However, the highly diverse populations of people with disabilities and multiple health conditions, as citizens and members of the general population, are often absent from, or in the background of, initiatives to improve people’s access to health information for informing health decisions. The foregrounding of “less visible” populations with disabilities and/or multiple health conditions means making them a priority, including them in health information initiatives and research, and reporting specifically and respectfully on their needs. In making these diverse populations more visible, health information management professionals could lead the charge to a more inclusive and just health system. Hoyle (2018: 48) emphasised this, and questioned the primacy of diagnostic constructs over aspects of the human experiences: “More fundamentally, the conceptual foundations of health information in terms of “diagnostic” constructs are creating limitations: Why should a medical diagnosis be privileged as the key descriptor of care, over disability or other aspects of the human experience? Who gets to say what matters, and how and by whom is that translated into meaningful information? These are important questions on which the health information management profession is well placed to lead”.","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":"51 3","pages":"113-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583211052708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Good access to and management of high-quality health information is essential for people with disabilities and/or multiple health conditions. This includes access to information about health and personally held information that can be stored and shared across their health providers (Hemsley et al. 2016). Public digital health technologies (e.g., blogs and websites, social media, and mobile technology apps) as well as personally-controlled electronic health records should help people with disabilities and multiple health conditions make better use of health information and engage in storing and sharing that information at critical points in their health pathway. However, the highly diverse populations of people with disabilities and multiple health conditions, as citizens and members of the general population, are often absent from, or in the background of, initiatives to improve people’s access to health information for informing health decisions. The foregrounding of “less visible” populations with disabilities and/or multiple health conditions means making them a priority, including them in health information initiatives and research, and reporting specifically and respectfully on their needs. In making these diverse populations more visible, health information management professionals could lead the charge to a more inclusive and just health system. Hoyle (2018: 48) emphasised this, and questioned the primacy of diagnostic constructs over aspects of the human experiences: “More fundamentally, the conceptual foundations of health information in terms of “diagnostic” constructs are creating limitations: Why should a medical diagnosis be privileged as the key descriptor of care, over disability or other aspects of the human experience? Who gets to say what matters, and how and by whom is that translated into meaningful information? These are important questions on which the health information management profession is well placed to lead”.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识到复杂性:将弱势群体和不同人群纳入包容性卫生信息管理研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health information management students' work-integrated learning (professional practice placements): Where do they go and what do they do? Physician-clinical coder collaboration effectively improves coding accuracy: A single-centre prospective study in China. Physicians' acceptance and adoption of mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. The health information management workforce: Looking to the future. Demystifying environmental health-related diseases: Using ICD codes to facilitate environmental health clinical referrals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1