One size does not fit all - overcoming barriers to participant recruitment in qualitative research.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2022-03-10 Epub Date: 2022-01-06 DOI:10.7748/nr.2022.e1809
Philip John Archard, Michelle O'Reilly
{"title":"One size does not fit all - overcoming barriers to participant recruitment in qualitative research.","authors":"Philip John Archard, Michelle O'Reilly","doi":"10.7748/nr.2022.e1809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It can be challenging to recruit participants for qualitative research. Recruitment can be affected by factors such as systemic barriers, as well as potential participants being reluctant to enrol in research they view as time-consuming and burdensome - particularly research exploring sensitive topics.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyse and describe the implementation of multiple recruitment strategies used to overcome the recruitment barriers in a qualitative study exploring the use of physical restraints during mechanical ventilation in intensive care.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Recruitment strategies that are helpful for one study may not be successful in another. Qualitative researchers may face many recruitment challenges specific to the contexts of their studies. Overcoming these challenges can be costly, time-consuming and often frustrating, so it is important that researchers develop qualities and skills that enable them to navigate these barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse researchers must consider the contexts of their target populations and tailor their recruitment strategies to the populations' needs. They must also be flexible, innovative and persistent in their approach, despite the challenges they face.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This paper provides insights into the recruitment barriers faced during a qualitative study and possible solutions. These insights can guide nurse researchers facing similar challenges in qualitative research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: It can be challenging to recruit participants for qualitative research. Recruitment can be affected by factors such as systemic barriers, as well as potential participants being reluctant to enrol in research they view as time-consuming and burdensome - particularly research exploring sensitive topics.

Aim: To analyse and describe the implementation of multiple recruitment strategies used to overcome the recruitment barriers in a qualitative study exploring the use of physical restraints during mechanical ventilation in intensive care.

Discussion: Recruitment strategies that are helpful for one study may not be successful in another. Qualitative researchers may face many recruitment challenges specific to the contexts of their studies. Overcoming these challenges can be costly, time-consuming and often frustrating, so it is important that researchers develop qualities and skills that enable them to navigate these barriers.

Conclusion: Nurse researchers must consider the contexts of their target populations and tailor their recruitment strategies to the populations' needs. They must also be flexible, innovative and persistent in their approach, despite the challenges they face.

Implications for practice: This paper provides insights into the recruitment barriers faced during a qualitative study and possible solutions. These insights can guide nurse researchers facing similar challenges in qualitative research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一刀切--克服定性研究中参与者招募的障碍。
背景:为定性研究招募参与者具有挑战性。招募工作可能会受到一些因素的影响,例如系统性障碍,以及潜在参与者不愿意参加他们认为费时费力的研究--尤其是探讨敏感话题的研究。目的:分析并描述在一项探讨重症监护机械通气期间使用物理约束的定性研究中,为克服招募障碍而实施的多种招募策略:对某项研究有帮助的招募策略在另一项研究中可能并不成功。定性研究人员可能会面临许多与其研究背景相关的招募挑战。克服这些挑战可能需要花费大量的成本和时间,而且往往令人沮丧,因此研究人员必须培养能够克服这些障碍的素质和技能:护士研究人员必须考虑其目标人群的背景,并根据人群的需求调整其招募策略。尽管面临挑战,他们还必须采取灵活、创新和坚持不懈的方法:本文深入探讨了定性研究中面临的招募障碍以及可能的解决方案。这些见解可以为在定性研究中面临类似挑战的护士研究人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in grounded theory. The methodological challenges faced when conducting hydration research in UK care homes. Reflections on being an insider researcher: a study exploring the experiences of men accessing rural mental health services. A reflection on the use of virtual nominal group technique in health policy and research priority consensus studies. A worked example of contextualising and using reflexive thematic analysis in nursing research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1