Factors predicting futility of liver transplant in elderly recipients: A single-center experience.

Cerise Kleb, Muhammad Salman Faisal, Cristiano Quintini, Charles M Miller, K V Narayanan Menon, Jamak Modaresi Esfeh
{"title":"Factors predicting futility of liver transplant in elderly recipients: A single-center experience.","authors":"Cerise Kleb,&nbsp;Muhammad Salman Faisal,&nbsp;Cristiano Quintini,&nbsp;Charles M Miller,&nbsp;K V Narayanan Menon,&nbsp;Jamak Modaresi Esfeh","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v11.i10.421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As the population of the United States ages, there has been an increasing number of elderly patients with cirrhosis listed for transplant. Previous studies have shown variable results in terms of the relative survival benefit for elderly liver transplant (LT) recipients. There may be factors that are associated with a poor post-transplant outcome which may help determine which elderly patients should and should not be listed for LT.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify factors associated with futility of transplant in elderly patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of all patients above the age of 45 who underwent liver transplantation at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and March 2020 (<i>n</i> = 1019). \"Elderly\" was defined as all patients aged 65 years and older. Futile outcome was defined as death within 90 d of transplant. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine what variables, if any were associated with futile outcome in elderly patients. Secondary outcomes such as one year mortality and discharge to facility (such as skilled nursing facility or long-term acute care hospital) were analyzed in the entire sample, compared across three age groups (45-54, 55-64, and 65 + years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a total of 260 elderly patients who received LT in the designated time period. A total of 20 patients met the definition of \"futile\" outcome. The mean Model of End-Stage Liver Disease scores in the futile and non-futile group were not significantly different (21.78 in the futile group <i>vs</i> 19.66 in the \"non-futile\" group). Of the variables tested, only congestive heart failure was found to have a statistically significant association with futile outcome in LT recipients over the age of 65 (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Of these patients, all had diastolic heart failure with normal ejection fraction and at least grade I diastolic dysfunction as measured on echocardiogram. Patients aged 65 years and older were more likely to have the outcomes of death within 1 year of LT [hazard ratio: 1.937, confidence interval (CI): 1.24-3.02, <i>P</i> = 0.003] and discharge to facility (odds ratio: 1.94, CI: 1.4-2.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001) compared to patients in younger age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Diastolic heart failure in the elderly may be a predictor of futility post liver transplant in elderly patients. Elderly LT recipients may have worse outcomes as compared to younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":68893,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","volume":"11 10","pages":"421-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/55/WJT-11-421.PMC8529943.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v11.i10.421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: As the population of the United States ages, there has been an increasing number of elderly patients with cirrhosis listed for transplant. Previous studies have shown variable results in terms of the relative survival benefit for elderly liver transplant (LT) recipients. There may be factors that are associated with a poor post-transplant outcome which may help determine which elderly patients should and should not be listed for LT.

Aim: To identify factors associated with futility of transplant in elderly patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients above the age of 45 who underwent liver transplantation at our tertiary care center between January 2010 and March 2020 (n = 1019). "Elderly" was defined as all patients aged 65 years and older. Futile outcome was defined as death within 90 d of transplant. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine what variables, if any were associated with futile outcome in elderly patients. Secondary outcomes such as one year mortality and discharge to facility (such as skilled nursing facility or long-term acute care hospital) were analyzed in the entire sample, compared across three age groups (45-54, 55-64, and 65 + years).

Results: There was a total of 260 elderly patients who received LT in the designated time period. A total of 20 patients met the definition of "futile" outcome. The mean Model of End-Stage Liver Disease scores in the futile and non-futile group were not significantly different (21.78 in the futile group vs 19.66 in the "non-futile" group). Of the variables tested, only congestive heart failure was found to have a statistically significant association with futile outcome in LT recipients over the age of 65 (P = 0.001). Of these patients, all had diastolic heart failure with normal ejection fraction and at least grade I diastolic dysfunction as measured on echocardiogram. Patients aged 65 years and older were more likely to have the outcomes of death within 1 year of LT [hazard ratio: 1.937, confidence interval (CI): 1.24-3.02, P = 0.003] and discharge to facility (odds ratio: 1.94, CI: 1.4-2.8, P < 0.001) compared to patients in younger age groups.

Conclusion: Diastolic heart failure in the elderly may be a predictor of futility post liver transplant in elderly patients. Elderly LT recipients may have worse outcomes as compared to younger patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测老年肝移植无效的因素:单中心经验。
背景:随着美国人口的老龄化,越来越多的老年肝硬化患者被列入移植名单。先前的研究显示,老年肝移植(LT)受者的相对生存获益有不同的结果。可能存在与移植后预后不良相关的因素,这些因素可能有助于确定哪些老年患者应该或不应该进行肝移植。目的:确定与老年患者移植无效相关的因素。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,纳入2010年1月至2020年3月期间在我们三级保健中心接受肝移植的所有45岁以上患者(n = 1019)。“老年人”定义为年龄在65岁及以上的所有患者。无效预后定义为移植后90 d内死亡。进行逻辑回归分析以确定哪些变量与老年患者的无效结果相关,如果有的话。次要结局,如一年死亡率和出院机构(如熟练护理机构或长期急性护理医院)在整个样本中进行分析,比较三个年龄组(45-54岁,55-64岁和65岁以上)。结果:在指定时间段内接受肝移植的老年患者共260例。共有20例患者符合“无效”结果的定义。无效组和非无效组的终末期肝病模型平均评分无显著差异(无效组21.78比非无效组19.66)。在测试的变量中,只有充血性心力衰竭被发现与65岁以上的肝移植接受者的无效结果有统计学意义的关联(P = 0.001)。在这些患者中,所有患者都有舒张性心力衰竭,射血分数正常,超声心动图显示至少有I级舒张功能障碍。与年轻年龄组的患者相比,65岁及以上的患者更有可能在LT后1年内死亡[风险比:1.937,可信区间(CI): 1.24-3.02, P = 0.003]和出院(优势比:1.94,CI: 1.4-2.8, P < 0.001)。结论:老年人舒张性心力衰竭可能是老年患者肝移植后无效的预测因素。与年轻患者相比,老年肝移植受者的预后可能更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
364
期刊最新文献
Cardiac evaluation of renal transplant candidates with heart failure. Clinical use of donor-derived cell-free DNA in kidney transplantation. Ethical frontiers in liver transplantation. Evolution of liver transplantation in the metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease era: Tracking impact through time. Imaging-based prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after microwave ablation as bridge therapy: A glimpse into the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1