Measuring the impact of legal recognition of same-sex marriage among sexual minority women.

IF 2 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-06-07 DOI:10.1080/1550428x.2021.1935382
Laurie A Drabble, Amy A Mericle, Angie R Wootton, Cat Munroe, Libo Li, Karen F Trocki, Tonda Hughes
{"title":"Measuring the impact of legal recognition of same-sex marriage among sexual minority women.","authors":"Laurie A Drabble,&nbsp;Amy A Mericle,&nbsp;Angie R Wootton,&nbsp;Cat Munroe,&nbsp;Libo Li,&nbsp;Karen F Trocki,&nbsp;Tonda Hughes","doi":"10.1080/1550428x.2021.1935382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reductions in structural stigma, such as gaining access to legalized same-sex marriage, is associated with positive psychological and physical health outcomes among sexual minority adults. However, these positive outcomes may be less robust among sexual minority women (SMW; e.g., lesbian, bisexual, queer) than sexual minority men and new measures are needed to develop a more nuanced understanding of the impact of affirming policies on the health and well-being of SMW. This study assessed the psychometric properties of measures developed to assess the psychosocial impacts of legalized same-sex marriage on the lives of SMW. Participants (N=446) completed an online survey assessing the psychosocial impact of legalized same-sex marriage in five domains: 1) personal impact, 2) stigma-related concerns, 3) couple impact, 4) LGBTQ community impact, and 5) political/social environment. Psychometric properties of the scales were examined using traditional and Rasch analyses. Personal, concerns, couple, and political/social environment scales demonstrated high internal consistency (α > 0.80), and acceptable levels of reliability even when scales reduced to five items each. The LGBTQ community scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α = 0.79) and could only be reduced to 9 items. These scales may be useful in future studies of SMW health and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":46967,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES","volume":"17 4","pages":"371-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1550428x.2021.1935382","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428x.2021.1935382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Reductions in structural stigma, such as gaining access to legalized same-sex marriage, is associated with positive psychological and physical health outcomes among sexual minority adults. However, these positive outcomes may be less robust among sexual minority women (SMW; e.g., lesbian, bisexual, queer) than sexual minority men and new measures are needed to develop a more nuanced understanding of the impact of affirming policies on the health and well-being of SMW. This study assessed the psychometric properties of measures developed to assess the psychosocial impacts of legalized same-sex marriage on the lives of SMW. Participants (N=446) completed an online survey assessing the psychosocial impact of legalized same-sex marriage in five domains: 1) personal impact, 2) stigma-related concerns, 3) couple impact, 4) LGBTQ community impact, and 5) political/social environment. Psychometric properties of the scales were examined using traditional and Rasch analyses. Personal, concerns, couple, and political/social environment scales demonstrated high internal consistency (α > 0.80), and acceptable levels of reliability even when scales reduced to five items each. The LGBTQ community scale demonstrated adequate internal consistency (α = 0.79) and could only be reduced to 9 items. These scales may be useful in future studies of SMW health and well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量法律承认同性婚姻对性少数女性的影响。
结构性耻辱的减少,例如获得合法同性婚姻的机会,与性少数群体成年人的积极心理和身体健康结果有关。然而,这些积极的结果在性少数女性中可能不那么明显(SMW;例如,女同性恋、双性恋、酷儿)比性少数群体男性多,需要采取新的措施,更细致地了解肯定政策对女同性恋者健康和福祉的影响。本研究评估了用于评估同性婚姻合法化对同性同性恋者生活的心理社会影响的测量方法的心理测量特性。参与者(N=446)完成了一项在线调查,评估了同性婚姻合法化在五个方面的社会心理影响:1)个人影响,2)与耻辱相关的问题,3)夫妻影响,4)LGBTQ社区影响,5)政治/社会环境。使用传统和Rasch分析对量表的心理测量特性进行了检验。个人、关注、夫妻和政治/社会环境量表显示出高度的内部一致性(α > 0.80),即使量表减少到五个项目,可靠性也可以接受。LGBTQ社区量表具有足够的内部一致性(α = 0.79),只能缩减到9个项目。这些量表可能在未来的SMW健康和福祉研究中有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of GLBT Family Studies is a much-needed resource on the working dynamics of the diverse family structures found in every corner of the world. This groundbreaking new journal addresses the vital issues facing gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender individuals and their families. Edited by Dr. Jerry J. Bigner, who has provided expert witness testimony in legal cases and in the litigation involving same-sex marriages in Canada, the journal features interdisciplinary studies and scholarly essays on topics related to GLBT family life and functioning as well as relationships with other families.
期刊最新文献
“I Am Fortunate to Have a Transgender Child”: An Investigation into the Barriers and Facilitators to Support among Parents of Trans and Nonbinary Youth “My Parents May Influence my Feelings about It But That’s Also Something That I Can Change Myself:” Transgender and Gender Diverse Youth Perspectives on Parental Messages about Sexuality Predicting Relationship Satisfaction in LGBQ + People Using Internalized Stigma, Outness, and Concealment Childless Bisexual and Gay Men’s Expectations of Obstacles and Enabling Factors for Pursuing Parenthood Predictors of Attitudes toward Lesbian and Gay Parenting in an Ecuadorian Sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1