The Cardiovascular Variability during Transient 6° Head Down Tilt and Slow Breathing in Yoga Experienced Healthy Individuals.

IF 1.1 Q3 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE International Journal of Yoga Pub Date : 2021-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-22 DOI:10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_79_21
Boligarla Anasuya, Kishore Kumar Deepak, Ashok Kumar Jaryal
{"title":"The Cardiovascular Variability during Transient 6° Head Down Tilt and Slow Breathing in Yoga Experienced Healthy Individuals.","authors":"Boligarla Anasuya,&nbsp;Kishore Kumar Deepak,&nbsp;Ashok Kumar Jaryal","doi":"10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_79_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The intervention of yoga has been shown to improve autonomic conditioning in humans and better adaptability to orthostatic challenges. Similarly, slow breathing at 0.1 Hz akin to pranayama also increases baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Hence, we intended to investigate whether yoga practitioners have different autonomic responses at rest,during slow deep breathingas well as during 6° head down tilt (HDT) compared to naive group individuals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate the acute effects of slow breathing on cardiovascular variability during HDT in yoga practitioners compared to yoga-naïve individuals.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a comparative study with repeated measures design conducted in Autonomic Function Test lab of the Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Time domain and frequency domain parameters of heart rate variability, blood pressure variability (BPV), and BRS were evaluated during 6° HDT and slow breathing at 0.1 Hz on forty yoga-naïve individuals and forty yoga practitioners with an average age of 31.08 ± 7.31 years and 29.93 ± 7.57 years, respectively. All of the participants were healthy.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>General Linear Mixed Model ANOVA was applied with yoga experience as a between-group factor in repeated measures. Independent sample <i>t</i>-test was applied for between group comparison of respiratory rate, demographic, and anthropometric data. <i>P</i> <0.05 is considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between-group comparison during HDT with spontaneous breathing has shown a significantly lower heart rate (<i>P</i> = 0.004) with higher RR interval (RRI) (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and pNN50% (<i>P</i> = 0.019) in yoga practitioners. The sequence BRS (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and α low frequency (LF) of spectral BRS (<i>P</i> = 0.035) were also significantly higher in the yoga group compared to the naïve group. Similarly, during HDT with slow breathing, the heart rate was lower (<i>P</i> = 0.01); with higher RRI (<i>P</i> = 0.009); pNN50% (<i>P</i> = 0.048). Standard deviation of successive RR interval difference of systolic BPV was lower (<i>P</i> = 0.024) with higher sequence BRS (<i>P</i> = 0.001) and α LF of spectral BRS (<i>P</i> = 0.002) in yoga group than naïve group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The yoga experienced individuals exhibit higher resting parasympathetic activity, lower systolic BPV, and higher BRS than naïve to yoga individuals. It is inferred from the findings that yoga practitioners were better adapted to transient cephalad fluid shift that happens during 6° HDT. Furthermore, acute slow breathing during 6° HDT reduced the systolic blood pressure in all the participants suggesting the beneficial role of slow breathing during exposure to extreme conditions such as microgravity which might help in the prevention of adverse effects of cephalad fluid shift during long-term weightlessness and maintain the astronaut health. Future mechanistic studies with active yoga intervention are necessary to understand the adaptive mechanisms involving central and vascular modulations contributing to either attenuation or accentuation of the cardiovagal baroreflex during HDT and slow breathing in healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":14436,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Yoga","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/11/d3/IJY-14-188.PMC8691439.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Yoga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_79_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The intervention of yoga has been shown to improve autonomic conditioning in humans and better adaptability to orthostatic challenges. Similarly, slow breathing at 0.1 Hz akin to pranayama also increases baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Hence, we intended to investigate whether yoga practitioners have different autonomic responses at rest,during slow deep breathingas well as during 6° head down tilt (HDT) compared to naive group individuals.

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the acute effects of slow breathing on cardiovascular variability during HDT in yoga practitioners compared to yoga-naïve individuals.

Settings and design: This was a comparative study with repeated measures design conducted in Autonomic Function Test lab of the Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Materials and methods: Time domain and frequency domain parameters of heart rate variability, blood pressure variability (BPV), and BRS were evaluated during 6° HDT and slow breathing at 0.1 Hz on forty yoga-naïve individuals and forty yoga practitioners with an average age of 31.08 ± 7.31 years and 29.93 ± 7.57 years, respectively. All of the participants were healthy.

Statistical analysis used: General Linear Mixed Model ANOVA was applied with yoga experience as a between-group factor in repeated measures. Independent sample t-test was applied for between group comparison of respiratory rate, demographic, and anthropometric data. P <0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results: Between-group comparison during HDT with spontaneous breathing has shown a significantly lower heart rate (P = 0.004) with higher RR interval (RRI) (P = 0.002) and pNN50% (P = 0.019) in yoga practitioners. The sequence BRS (P < 0.0001) and α low frequency (LF) of spectral BRS (P = 0.035) were also significantly higher in the yoga group compared to the naïve group. Similarly, during HDT with slow breathing, the heart rate was lower (P = 0.01); with higher RRI (P = 0.009); pNN50% (P = 0.048). Standard deviation of successive RR interval difference of systolic BPV was lower (P = 0.024) with higher sequence BRS (P = 0.001) and α LF of spectral BRS (P = 0.002) in yoga group than naïve group.

Conclusion: The yoga experienced individuals exhibit higher resting parasympathetic activity, lower systolic BPV, and higher BRS than naïve to yoga individuals. It is inferred from the findings that yoga practitioners were better adapted to transient cephalad fluid shift that happens during 6° HDT. Furthermore, acute slow breathing during 6° HDT reduced the systolic blood pressure in all the participants suggesting the beneficial role of slow breathing during exposure to extreme conditions such as microgravity which might help in the prevention of adverse effects of cephalad fluid shift during long-term weightlessness and maintain the astronaut health. Future mechanistic studies with active yoga intervention are necessary to understand the adaptive mechanisms involving central and vascular modulations contributing to either attenuation or accentuation of the cardiovagal baroreflex during HDT and slow breathing in healthy individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康瑜伽练习者头部短暂6°下倾和缓慢呼吸时的心血管变异性
目的:瑜伽的干预已被证明可以改善人类的自主调节和更好的适应直立挑战。同样,0.1赫兹的慢呼吸也会增加气压反射敏感性(BRS)。因此,我们打算调查瑜伽练习者在休息、缓慢深呼吸以及头部向下倾斜6°(HDT)时是否有不同的自主神经反应。目的:本研究的目的是评估瑜伽练习者与yoga-naïve个体相比,在HDT期间缓慢呼吸对心血管变异性的急性影响。环境和设计:本研究采用重复测量设计,在印度新德里全印度医学科学研究所生理学系自主功能测试实验室进行。材料与方法:对40例yoga-naïve个体和40例平均年龄分别为31.08±7.31岁和29.93±7.57岁的瑜伽练习者进行6°HDT和0.1 Hz慢呼吸时心率变异性、血压变异性(BPV)和BRS的时域和频域参数进行评估。所有的参与者都很健康。采用统计学分析:采用一般线性混合模型方差分析,瑜伽经验作为重复测量的组间因素。呼吸频率、人口统计学和人体测量学数据的组间比较采用独立样本t检验。结果:组间比较显示,瑜伽练习者进行自主呼吸HDT时心率显著降低(P = 0.004), RR间期(P = 0.002)和pNN50%显著升高(P = 0.019)。瑜伽组的序列BRS (P < 0.0001)和谱BRS的α低频(LF) (P = 0.035)也显著高于naïve组。同样,呼吸缓慢的HDT组心率较低(P = 0.01);RRI较高(P = 0.009);pNN50%, P = 0.048。与naïve组相比,瑜伽组收缩期BPV连续RR间隔差的标准差更低(P = 0.024),序列BRS (P = 0.001)和谱BRS α LF (P = 0.002)更高。结论:练习瑜伽的人比练习瑜伽的人表现出更高的静息副交感神经活动,更低的收缩期BPV和更高的BRS naïve。从研究结果推断,瑜伽练习者更好地适应6°HDT期间发生的短暂头部液体转移。此外,在6°HDT期间急性缓慢呼吸降低了所有参与者的收缩压,这表明在暴露于极端条件(如微重力)时缓慢呼吸的有益作用,可能有助于预防长期失重期间头部液体转移的不利影响,并维持宇航员的健康。未来有必要进行积极瑜伽干预的机制研究,以了解涉及中枢和血管调节的适应性机制,这些机制有助于HDT和健康个体缓慢呼吸期间心血管压力反射的衰减或增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Yoga
International Journal of Yoga INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Supervised Yogic Intervention on Pain Status, Flexibility, and Corticomotor Excitability in Fibromyalgia Patients: A Unique Case Report. Effect of Volitional Modification of Breath Frequency on Attention and Mood States: An Exploratory Randomized Crossover Study. Efficacy of Standardized Yoga Asanas as Add-on Therapy in the Management of Hypothyroidism: A Randomized, Open-label, Controlled Clinical Study. Impact of Nada Yoga Music Therapy on Anxiety and Quality of Life in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Influence of High-frequency Yoga Breathing (Kapalabhati) on States Changes in Gamma Oscillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1