Influence of Pathogen Type on Neonatal Sepsis Biomarkers.

IF 2.6 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY International Journal of Inflammation Pub Date : 2021-11-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/1009231
Lyudmila Akhmaltdinova, Svetlana Kolesnichenko, Alyona Lavrinenko, Irina Kadyrova, Olga Avdienko, Lyudmila Panibratec
{"title":"Influence of Pathogen Type on Neonatal Sepsis Biomarkers.","authors":"Lyudmila Akhmaltdinova,&nbsp;Svetlana Kolesnichenko,&nbsp;Alyona Lavrinenko,&nbsp;Irina Kadyrova,&nbsp;Olga Avdienko,&nbsp;Lyudmila Panibratec","doi":"10.1155/2021/1009231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding immunoregulation in newborns can help to determine the pathophysiology of neonatal sepsis and will contribute to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and remains an urgent and unmet medical need to understand hyperinflammation or hypoinflammation associated with sepsis in newborns. This study included infants (up to 4 days old). The \"sepsis\" criteria was a positive blood culture. C-reactive protein demonstrates a strong dependence on the pathogen etiology. Therefore, its diagnostic odds ratio in Gram-positive bacteremia was 2.7 and the sensitivity was 45%, while Gram-negative was 15.0 and 81.8%, respectively. A neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio above 1 and thrombocytopenia below 50 <sup><i>∗</i></sup> 10<sup>9</sup> cells/L generally do not depend on the type of pathogen and have a specificity of 95%; however, the sensitivity of these markers is low. nCD64 demonstrated good analytical performance and was equally discriminated in both Gram (+) and Gram (-) cultures. The sensitivity was 87.5-89%, and the specificity was 65%. The HLA-DR and programmed cell death protein study found that activation-deactivation processes in systemic infection is different at points of application depending on the type of pathogen: Gram-positive infections showed various ways of activation of monocytes (by reducing suppressive signals) and lymphocytes (an increase in activation signals), and Gram-negative pathogens were most commonly involved in suppressing monocytic activation. Thus, the difference in the bacteremia model can partially explain the problems with the high variability of immunologic markers in neonatal sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14004,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Inflammation","volume":"2021 ","pages":"1009231"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626169/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1009231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Understanding immunoregulation in newborns can help to determine the pathophysiology of neonatal sepsis and will contribute to improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment and remains an urgent and unmet medical need to understand hyperinflammation or hypoinflammation associated with sepsis in newborns. This study included infants (up to 4 days old). The "sepsis" criteria was a positive blood culture. C-reactive protein demonstrates a strong dependence on the pathogen etiology. Therefore, its diagnostic odds ratio in Gram-positive bacteremia was 2.7 and the sensitivity was 45%, while Gram-negative was 15.0 and 81.8%, respectively. A neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio above 1 and thrombocytopenia below 50 109 cells/L generally do not depend on the type of pathogen and have a specificity of 95%; however, the sensitivity of these markers is low. nCD64 demonstrated good analytical performance and was equally discriminated in both Gram (+) and Gram (-) cultures. The sensitivity was 87.5-89%, and the specificity was 65%. The HLA-DR and programmed cell death protein study found that activation-deactivation processes in systemic infection is different at points of application depending on the type of pathogen: Gram-positive infections showed various ways of activation of monocytes (by reducing suppressive signals) and lymphocytes (an increase in activation signals), and Gram-negative pathogens were most commonly involved in suppressing monocytic activation. Thus, the difference in the bacteremia model can partially explain the problems with the high variability of immunologic markers in neonatal sepsis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病原体类型对新生儿脓毒症生物标志物的影响。
了解新生儿的免疫调节有助于确定新生儿脓毒症的病理生理学,并有助于改善诊断、预后和治疗,了解新生儿脓毒症相关的高炎症或低炎症仍然是一个迫切和未满足的医学需求。这项研究包括婴儿(4天大)。“败血症”的标准是血培养阳性。c反应蛋白表现出很强的病原学依赖性。因此,其对革兰氏阳性菌血症的诊断优势比为2.7,敏感性为45%,革兰氏阴性菌血症的诊断优势比为15.0,敏感性为81.8%。中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率高于1和血小板减少症低于50 * 109细胞/L通常不依赖于病原体的类型,特异性为95%;然而,这些标记的灵敏度很低。nCD64表现出良好的分析性能,并且在Gram(+)和Gram(-)培养中都具有同样的鉴别性。敏感性为87.5 ~ 89%,特异性为65%。HLA-DR和程序性细胞死亡蛋白研究发现,根据病原体类型的不同,全身感染的激活-失活过程在应用点上是不同的:革兰氏阳性感染表现出多种激活单核细胞(通过减少抑制信号)和淋巴细胞(激活信号增加)的方式,而革兰氏阴性病原体最常参与抑制单核细胞激活。因此,菌血症模型的差异可以部分解释新生儿败血症中免疫标记物的高变异性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Extended Inflammation Parameters (EIP) as Markers of Inflammation in Systemic Sclerosis. The Effect of Endotoxin-Induced Inflammation on the Activity of the Somatotropic Axis in Sheep. Characterization of a New Immunosuppressive and Antimicrobial Peptide, DRS-DA2, Isolated from the Mexican Frog, Pachymedusa dacnicolor. Association of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and Human Endogenous Retroviruses (HERV) with Multiple Sclerosis in Northwest of Iran. Irisin and Cardiometabolic Disorders in Obesity: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1