Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture and Moxibustion in Acute Phase and Non-acute Phase of Bell's Palsy: a meta-analysis.
Pub Date : 2021-11-30
Ziliang Zou
{"title":"Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture and Moxibustion in Acute Phase and Non-acute Phase of Bell's Palsy: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Ziliang Zou","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for bell's palsy in the acute phase compared with the non-acute phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Computer retrieval of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Wanfang data, were conducted. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality of literature was evaluated, and useful data was extracted. All statistical analyses were performed by RevMan5.3 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 eligible RCTs with a total of 2644 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results demonstrated the cure rate of acupuncture and moxibustion for Bell's palsy in the acute phase were lower than that in the non-acute phase (P<0.05). The time to cure of acupuncture and moxibustion for Bell's palsy in the acute phase was shorter than that in the non-acute phase (P<0.05), and the incidence of sequelae during the treatment period of acupuncture and moxibustion for Bell's palsy in the acute phase were lower than that in non-acute phase (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acupuncture and moxibustion were safe and effective stimulation for Bell's palsy in the acute phase compared with the non-acute phase, improving the cure rate of Bell's palsy, shorten the time to cure, and reduce the occurrence of sequelae. However, more multicenter RCTs with a large sample number and high quality should verify the conclusion mentioned above.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture and moxibustion for bell's palsy in the acute phase compared with the non-acute phase.
Methods: Computer retrieval of PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Wanfang data, were conducted. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the quality of literature was evaluated, and useful data was extracted. All statistical analyses were performed by RevMan5.3 software.
Results: 17 eligible RCTs with a total of 2644 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results demonstrated the cure rate of acupuncture and moxibustion for Bell's palsy in the acute phase were lower than that in the non-acute phase (P<0.05). The time to cure of acupuncture and moxibustion for Bell's palsy in the acute phase was shorter than that in the non-acute phase (P<0.05), and the incidence of sequelae during the treatment period of acupuncture and moxibustion for Bell's palsy in the acute phase were lower than that in non-acute phase (P<0.05).
Conclusions: Acupuncture and moxibustion were safe and effective stimulation for Bell's palsy in the acute phase compared with the non-acute phase, improving the cure rate of Bell's palsy, shorten the time to cure, and reduce the occurrence of sequelae. However, more multicenter RCTs with a large sample number and high quality should verify the conclusion mentioned above.
分享
微信好友
朋友圈
QQ好友
复制链接
针灸治疗贝尔麻痹急性期与非急性期疗效及安全性比较:meta分析。
目的:比较针刺治疗急性期和非急性期贝尔麻痹的疗效和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库的数据。按照纳入标准和排除标准评价文献质量,提取有用资料。所有统计分析均采用RevMan5.3软件进行。结果:17项符合条件的随机对照试验共纳入2644例患者。meta分析结果显示,针灸治疗贝尔麻痹急性期的治愈率低于非急性期的治愈率(p)。结论:与非急性期相比,针灸治疗贝尔麻痹急性期安全有效,提高了贝尔麻痹治愈率,缩短了治愈时间,减少了后遗症的发生。然而,更多的大样本数、高质量的多中心rct应该验证上述结论。