Shoulder pain prevalence by age and within occupational groups: a systematic review.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2021-11-04 DOI:10.1186/s40945-021-00119-w
Christopher J Hodgetts, Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde, Amber Beynon, Bruce F Walker
{"title":"Shoulder pain prevalence by age and within occupational groups: a systematic review.","authors":"Christopher J Hodgetts,&nbsp;Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde,&nbsp;Amber Beynon,&nbsp;Bruce F Walker","doi":"10.1186/s40945-021-00119-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder pain was previously shown to diminish in older populations and it was suggested that this could be explained by reduced usage with age. Our objectives were to investigate if estimates of shoulder pain continue to increase after the age of 50 in working populations and to compare these estimates in physically demanding occupations with sedentary occupations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of retrospective, cross-sectional, prospective, or longitudinal. studies reporting prevalence or incidence of non-specific shoulder pain in occupational groups stratified by age. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from inception until January 2020. Study characteristics and prevalence estimates stratified by age were extracted. Two reviewers independently performed a critical analysis of the included studies to determine their validity and risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies with a total of 40,487 participants and one study of a clinical data base were included and assigned a direction of the estimates for shoulder pain as either 'increasing', 'remaining stable' or 'decreasing' past the age of 50. Shoulder pain generally increased past 50, with 16 of the 21 included studies reporting higher estimates/odds ratios in older participants. In the more physically active occupations over 50, the estimates increased in 14 of the 18 samples compared to only two of the four involving sedentary occupations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Shoulder pain prevalence remains common in workers beyond the age of 50. Prevalence continues to increase in physically demanding occupations. Clinicians should consider factors of occupation when managing shoulder pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (CRD42019137831).</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":"11 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8567712/pdf/","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-021-00119-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: Shoulder pain was previously shown to diminish in older populations and it was suggested that this could be explained by reduced usage with age. Our objectives were to investigate if estimates of shoulder pain continue to increase after the age of 50 in working populations and to compare these estimates in physically demanding occupations with sedentary occupations.

Methods: A systematic review of retrospective, cross-sectional, prospective, or longitudinal. studies reporting prevalence or incidence of non-specific shoulder pain in occupational groups stratified by age. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL from inception until January 2020. Study characteristics and prevalence estimates stratified by age were extracted. Two reviewers independently performed a critical analysis of the included studies to determine their validity and risk of bias.

Results: Twenty studies with a total of 40,487 participants and one study of a clinical data base were included and assigned a direction of the estimates for shoulder pain as either 'increasing', 'remaining stable' or 'decreasing' past the age of 50. Shoulder pain generally increased past 50, with 16 of the 21 included studies reporting higher estimates/odds ratios in older participants. In the more physically active occupations over 50, the estimates increased in 14 of the 18 samples compared to only two of the four involving sedentary occupations.

Conclusions: Shoulder pain prevalence remains common in workers beyond the age of 50. Prevalence continues to increase in physically demanding occupations. Clinicians should consider factors of occupation when managing shoulder pain.

Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42019137831).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩痛流行的年龄和职业群体:一个系统的回顾。
背景:以前的研究表明,肩部疼痛在老年人中减少,这可能是由于随着年龄的增长,肩部疼痛的使用减少。我们的目的是调查50岁以后肩部疼痛的估计值是否在工作人群中继续增加,并比较体力要求高的职业和久坐不动的职业的估计值。方法:回顾性、横断面、前瞻性或纵向的系统综述。研究报告了按年龄分层的职业群体中非特异性肩痛的患病率或发病率。从成立到2020年1月,在PubMed、Scopus和CINAHL中进行了搜索。提取按年龄分层的研究特征和患病率估计。两名审稿人独立地对纳入的研究进行了批判性分析,以确定其有效性和偏倚风险。结果:纳入了20项研究,共40,487名参与者和一项临床数据库研究,并为50岁以上的肩部疼痛评估分配了“增加”,“保持稳定”或“减少”的方向。肩痛一般在50岁以上加重,21项纳入的研究中有16项报告老年参与者的估计/比值比较高。在50岁以上的体力活动较多的职业中,18个样本中有14个样本的估计值增加,而在4个涉及久坐职业的样本中,只有2个样本的估计值增加。结论:肩痛的患病率在50岁以上的工人中仍然很常见。在体力要求高的职业中患病率继续上升。临床医生在处理肩痛时应考虑职业因素。试验注册:PROSPERO (CRD42019137831)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Indoor and outdoor 10-Meter Walk Test and Timed Up and Go in patients after total hip arthroplasty: a reliability and comparative study. Erratum in: Pragmatism in manual therapy trials for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of goniometric finger range of motion using a written protocol. A decade of growth: preserving the original meaning of research for physiotherapists. Neurological conditions and community-based physical activity: physical therapists' belief and actions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1