High-frame-rate A-mode ultrasound for calibration-free cuffless carotid pressure: feasibility study using lower body negative pressure intervention.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2022-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-11 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2021.2022453
Kiran V Raj, P M Nabeel, Dinu Chandran, Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam, Jayaraj Joseph
{"title":"High-frame-rate A-mode ultrasound for calibration-free cuffless carotid pressure: feasibility study using lower body negative pressure intervention.","authors":"Kiran V Raj,&nbsp;P M Nabeel,&nbsp;Dinu Chandran,&nbsp;Mohanasankar Sivaprakasam,&nbsp;Jayaraj Joseph","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2021.2022453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Existing technologies to measure central blood pressure (CBP) intrinsically depend on peripheral pressure or calibration models derived from it. Pharmacological or physiological interventions yielding different central and peripheral responses compromise the accuracy of such methods. We present a high-frame-rate ultrasound technology for cuffless and calibration-free evaluation of BP from the carotid artery. The system uses a pair of single-element ultrasound transducers to capture the arterial diameter and local pulse wave velocity (PWV) for the evaluation of beat-by-beat BP employing a novel biomechanical model.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>System's functionality assessment was conducted on eight male subjects (26 ± 4 years, normotensive and no history of cardiovascular risks) by perturbing pressure <i>via</i> short-term moderate lower body negative pressure (LBNP) intervention (-40 mmHg for 1 min). The ability of the system to capture dynamic responses of carotid pressure to LBNP was investigated and compared against the responses of peripheral pressure measured using a continuous BP monitor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the carotid pressure manifested trends similar to finger measurements during LBNP, the system also captured the differential carotid-to-peripheral pressure response, which corroborates the literature. The carotid diastolic and mean pressures agreed with the finger pressures (limits-of-agreement within ±7 mmHg) and exhibited acceptable uncertainty (mean absolute errors were 2.4 ± 3.5 and 2.6 ± 4.0 mmHg, respectively). Concurrent to the literature, the carotid systolic and pulse pressures (PPs) were significantly lower than those of the finger pressures by 11.1 ± 9.4 and 11.3 ± 8.2 mmHg, respectively (<i>p</i> < .0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrated the method's potential for providing cuffless and calibration-free pressure measurements while reliably capturing the physiological aspects, such as PP amplification and dynamic pressure responses to intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":" ","pages":"19-30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2021.2022453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Existing technologies to measure central blood pressure (CBP) intrinsically depend on peripheral pressure or calibration models derived from it. Pharmacological or physiological interventions yielding different central and peripheral responses compromise the accuracy of such methods. We present a high-frame-rate ultrasound technology for cuffless and calibration-free evaluation of BP from the carotid artery. The system uses a pair of single-element ultrasound transducers to capture the arterial diameter and local pulse wave velocity (PWV) for the evaluation of beat-by-beat BP employing a novel biomechanical model.

Materials and methods: System's functionality assessment was conducted on eight male subjects (26 ± 4 years, normotensive and no history of cardiovascular risks) by perturbing pressure via short-term moderate lower body negative pressure (LBNP) intervention (-40 mmHg for 1 min). The ability of the system to capture dynamic responses of carotid pressure to LBNP was investigated and compared against the responses of peripheral pressure measured using a continuous BP monitor.

Results: While the carotid pressure manifested trends similar to finger measurements during LBNP, the system also captured the differential carotid-to-peripheral pressure response, which corroborates the literature. The carotid diastolic and mean pressures agreed with the finger pressures (limits-of-agreement within ±7 mmHg) and exhibited acceptable uncertainty (mean absolute errors were 2.4 ± 3.5 and 2.6 ± 4.0 mmHg, respectively). Concurrent to the literature, the carotid systolic and pulse pressures (PPs) were significantly lower than those of the finger pressures by 11.1 ± 9.4 and 11.3 ± 8.2 mmHg, respectively (p < .0001).

Conclusions: The study demonstrated the method's potential for providing cuffless and calibration-free pressure measurements while reliably capturing the physiological aspects, such as PP amplification and dynamic pressure responses to intervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高帧率a型超声用于免校准颈动脉无袖扣压:采用下体负压介入的可行性研究。
目的:现有的中心血压(CBP)测量技术本质上依赖于外周压力或由外周压力衍生的校准模型。产生不同中枢和外周反应的药理学或生理学干预损害了这些方法的准确性。我们提出了一种高帧率超声技术,用于颈动脉血压的无套管和无校准评估。该系统使用一对单元件超声换能器来捕获动脉直径和局部脉搏波速度(PWV),并采用一种新的生物力学模型来评估逐拍血压。材料与方法:对8名男性受试者(26±4岁,血压正常,无心血管危险史)进行短期中度下体负压(LBNP)干预(-40 mmHg,持续1 min)的扰动压系统功能评估。研究了该系统捕捉颈动脉压力对LBNP动态反应的能力,并将其与使用连续血压监测仪测量的外周压力反应进行了比较。结果:虽然在LBNP期间颈动脉压力表现出与手指测量相似的趋势,但该系统也捕获了颈动脉到外周压力的差异反应,这证实了文献。颈动脉舒张压和平均压与手指压一致(一致限制在±7 mmHg内),并表现出可接受的不确定性(平均绝对误差分别为2.4±3.5和2.6±4.0 mmHg)。与文献同时,颈动脉收缩压和脉压(PPs)明显低于手指压力,分别为11.1±9.4和11.3±8.2 mmHg (p)。结论:该研究表明,该方法具有提供无袖扣和无需校准的压力测量的潜力,同时可靠地捕捉生理方面,如PP放大和干预后的动态压力反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative systemic arterial hypertension in infants with congenital heart diseases: prevalence and risk factors. Mission 70/26 Project: improving blood pressure control in Portugal. Factors associated with progression of arterial stiffness in ischemic stroke survivors: the Norwegian Stroke in the Young Study. The impact of prediabetes and diabetes on endothelial function in a large population-based cohort. The relationship between mid-upper arm circumference and blood pressure in Walter Sisulu University community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1