Is there an indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities? - A critical appraisal.

IF 1 Q4 REHABILITATION South African Journal of Physiotherapy Pub Date : 2021-10-04 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1569
Hans-Rudolf Weiss, Xiaofeng Nan, Matthew A Potts
{"title":"Is there an indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities? - A critical appraisal.","authors":"Hans-Rudolf Weiss,&nbsp;Xiaofeng Nan,&nbsp;Matthew A Potts","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality evidence exists to support physiotherapy and brace treatment for scoliosis and other spinal deformities. However, according to previous systematic reviews, it seems that no evidence exists for surgery. Nevertheless, the number of research articles focussing on spinal surgery highly exceeds the number of articles focussing on conservative treatment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to conduct an updated search for systematic reviews providing high-quality evidence for spinal surgery in patients with spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A narrative review including PubMed and the Cochrane database was conducted on April 12, 2020, with the following search terms: (1) spinal deformities, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (2) kyphosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (3) Scheuermann's disease, surgery, systematic review and outcome, and (4) scoliosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No reviews containing prospective controlled or randomised controlled studies were found providing evidence for surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A general indication for spine surgery just based on the Cobb angle is not given. In view of the long-term unknown variables and the possible long-term complications of such treatment, a surgical indication for patients with spinal deformities must be reviewed on an individual basis and considered carefully. A current systematic review appears necessary in order to be able to draw final conclusions on the indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>In view of the increasing number of surgeons with an affiliation to industry, the indication for surgery needs to be given by independent conservative specialists for spinal deformities in order to provide an objective recommendation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"77 2","pages":"1569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8603189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v77i2.1569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: High-quality evidence exists to support physiotherapy and brace treatment for scoliosis and other spinal deformities. However, according to previous systematic reviews, it seems that no evidence exists for surgery. Nevertheless, the number of research articles focussing on spinal surgery highly exceeds the number of articles focussing on conservative treatment.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to conduct an updated search for systematic reviews providing high-quality evidence for spinal surgery in patients with spinal deformities.

Method: A narrative review including PubMed and the Cochrane database was conducted on April 12, 2020, with the following search terms: (1) spinal deformities, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (2) kyphosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome; (3) Scheuermann's disease, surgery, systematic review and outcome, and (4) scoliosis, surgery, systematic review and outcome.

Results: No reviews containing prospective controlled or randomised controlled studies were found providing evidence for surgery.

Conclusions: A general indication for spine surgery just based on the Cobb angle is not given. In view of the long-term unknown variables and the possible long-term complications of such treatment, a surgical indication for patients with spinal deformities must be reviewed on an individual basis and considered carefully. A current systematic review appears necessary in order to be able to draw final conclusions on the indication for surgery in patients with spinal deformities.

Clinical implications: In view of the increasing number of surgeons with an affiliation to industry, the indication for surgery needs to be given by independent conservative specialists for spinal deformities in order to provide an objective recommendation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱畸形患者有手术指征吗?-批判性的评估。
背景:高质量的证据支持物理治疗和支具治疗脊柱侧凸和其他脊柱畸形。然而,根据以前的系统综述,似乎没有证据表明存在手术。然而,关注脊柱外科的研究文章数量远远超过关注保守治疗的文章数量。目的:本研究的目的是对脊柱畸形患者脊柱手术提供高质量证据的系统综述进行更新搜索。方法:于2020年4月12日对PubMed和Cochrane数据库进行叙述性综述,检索词为:(1)脊柱畸形、手术、系统综述和结局;(2)后凸、手术、系统评价和结果;(3)舒尔曼氏病,手术,系统评价和结果;(4)脊柱侧凸,手术,系统评价和结果。结果:未发现前瞻性对照或随机对照研究为手术提供证据。结论:没有给出仅仅基于Cobb角的脊柱手术的一般指征。鉴于这种治疗的长期未知变量和可能的长期并发症,脊柱畸形患者的手术指征必须根据个人情况进行审查并仔细考虑。当前的系统综述似乎是必要的,以便能够得出脊柱畸形患者手术指征的最终结论。临床意义:鉴于越来越多的外科医生与行业有联系,手术指征需要由独立的保守的脊柱畸形专家给出,以便提供客观的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Preventing deformities in paediatric cerebral palsy in poorly-resourced areas: A scoping review. Contextual factors experienced by mothers of children with special needs. Neurological examination of healthy term infants at ages 6 and 10 weeks in Tshwane District. Protracted exercise tolerance post-coronavirus disease 2019 in endurance athletes: A survey. Mental health content in the physiotherapy undergraduate curriculum in South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1