Is This the Prime Time for Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy?

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2021-10-18 eCollection Date: 2021-04-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2021.20
Zaccharie Tyler, Oliver P Guttmann, Konstantinos Savvatis, Daniel Jones, Constantinos O'Mahony
{"title":"Is This the Prime Time for Transradial Access Left Ventricular Endomyocardial Biopsy?","authors":"Zaccharie Tyler,&nbsp;Oliver P Guttmann,&nbsp;Konstantinos Savvatis,&nbsp;Daniel Jones,&nbsp;Constantinos O'Mahony","doi":"10.15420/icr.2021.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an essential tool in the management of myocarditis and is conventionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA). Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB) is a novel alternative and the authors sought to determine its safety and feasibility by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline was searched in 2020, and cohort demographics, procedural details and complications were extracted from selected studies. Four observational studies with a combined total of 496 procedures were included. TRA-EMB was most frequently performed with a sheathless MP1 guide catheter via the right radial artery. The most common complication was pericardial effusion (up to 11% in one study), but pericardial drainage for tamponade was rare (one reported case). Death and mitral valve damage have not been reported. TRA-EMB was successful in obtaining samples in 99% of reported procedures. The authors concluded that TRA-EMB is a safe and feasible alternative to TFA-EMB and the most common complication is uncomplicated pericardial effusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":"16 ","pages":"e29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c3/e4/icr-16-e29.PMC8548872.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Left ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is an essential tool in the management of myocarditis and is conventionally performed via transfemoral access (TFA). Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB) is a novel alternative and the authors sought to determine its safety and feasibility by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Medline was searched in 2020, and cohort demographics, procedural details and complications were extracted from selected studies. Four observational studies with a combined total of 496 procedures were included. TRA-EMB was most frequently performed with a sheathless MP1 guide catheter via the right radial artery. The most common complication was pericardial effusion (up to 11% in one study), but pericardial drainage for tamponade was rare (one reported case). Death and mitral valve damage have not been reported. TRA-EMB was successful in obtaining samples in 99% of reported procedures. The authors concluded that TRA-EMB is a safe and feasible alternative to TFA-EMB and the most common complication is uncomplicated pericardial effusion.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这是经桡动脉进入左心室心肌内膜活检的最佳时机吗?
左心室心肌内膜活检(EMB)是治疗心肌炎的重要工具,通常通过经股通道(TFA)进行。Transradial access EMB (TRA-EMB)是一种新颖的替代方法,作者试图通过对文献进行系统的回顾来确定其安全性和可行性。Medline在2020年进行了检索,并从选定的研究中提取了队列人口统计数据、程序细节和并发症。四项观察性研究共纳入496项手术。TRA-EMB最常采用无鞘MP1导管经右桡动脉。最常见的并发症是心包积液(在一项研究中高达11%),但心包填塞引流是罕见的(一个报告病例)。死亡和二尖瓣损伤未见报道。TRA-EMB在99%的报告程序中成功获得了样品。作者认为TRA-EMB是TFA-EMB的一种安全可行的替代方法,最常见的并发症是无并发症的心包积液。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wire Escalation And De-escalation Techniques in Antegrade and Retrograde Approaches to Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Training Culture Focus Group Position Statement: Bringing Trainees and Trainers Together. Atherectomy Techniques: Rotablation, Orbital and Laser. Outcomes and Complications of Mitral and Tricuspid Transcatheter Edge-to-edge Repair. New-generation Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: First Procedures in Central Asia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1