Readmission into intensive care unit in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Hye Seok Park, Sung Ho Lee, Kang Min Kim, Won-Sang Cho, Hyun-Seung Kang, Jeong Eun Kim, Eun Jin Ha
{"title":"Readmission into intensive care unit in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.","authors":"Hye Seok Park,&nbsp;Sung Ho Lee,&nbsp;Kang Min Kim,&nbsp;Won-Sang Cho,&nbsp;Hyun-Seung Kang,&nbsp;Jeong Eun Kim,&nbsp;Eun Jin Ha","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating cerebrovascular event; patients are routinely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for initial management. Because complications may be delayed, unplanned ICU readmissions can occur. Therefore, in this study we evaluate the rate of and factors associated with readmission after aSAH and identify if readmission is associated with poor clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receiving surgical or endovascular treatment for aSAH and admitted to the ICU between January 2008 and December 2019. We categorized patients by readmission and analyzed their clinical parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 345 patients who transferred to ward-level care after an initial ICU stay (Group 2), 27 (7.3%) were readmitted to the ICU (Group 1). History of hypertension (HTN), initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, modified Fisher grade, and vasospasm therapy during first ICU stay were significantly different between the groups. The most common reason for readmission was delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI; 70.3%; OR 5.545; 95% CI 1.25-24.52; p=0.024). Comorbid HTN (OR 5.311; 95% CI 1.75-16.12; p=0.03) and vasospasm therapy during first ICU stay (OR 7.234; 95% CI 2.41-21.7; p<0.01) also were associated with readmission. Readmitted patients had longer hospital stay and lower GCS scores at discharge (p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCI was the most common cause of ICU readmission in patients with aSAH. Readmission may indicate clinical deterioration, and patients who are at a high risk for DCI should be monitored to prevent readmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":15359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery","volume":"23 4","pages":"327-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/19/7c/jcen-2021-e2021-06-001.PMC8743824.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2021.E2021.06.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating cerebrovascular event; patients are routinely admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for initial management. Because complications may be delayed, unplanned ICU readmissions can occur. Therefore, in this study we evaluate the rate of and factors associated with readmission after aSAH and identify if readmission is associated with poor clinical outcomes.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all patients receiving surgical or endovascular treatment for aSAH and admitted to the ICU between January 2008 and December 2019. We categorized patients by readmission and analyzed their clinical parameters.

Results: Of the 345 patients who transferred to ward-level care after an initial ICU stay (Group 2), 27 (7.3%) were readmitted to the ICU (Group 1). History of hypertension (HTN), initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, modified Fisher grade, and vasospasm therapy during first ICU stay were significantly different between the groups. The most common reason for readmission was delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI; 70.3%; OR 5.545; 95% CI 1.25-24.52; p=0.024). Comorbid HTN (OR 5.311; 95% CI 1.75-16.12; p=0.03) and vasospasm therapy during first ICU stay (OR 7.234; 95% CI 2.41-21.7; p<0.01) also were associated with readmission. Readmitted patients had longer hospital stay and lower GCS scores at discharge (p<0.01).

Conclusions: DCI was the most common cause of ICU readmission in patients with aSAH. Readmission may indicate clinical deterioration, and patients who are at a high risk for DCI should be monitored to prevent readmission.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者再次入住重症监护病房的分析。
目的:动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)是一种破坏性的脑血管事件;患者通常入住重症监护病房(ICU)进行初步治疗。由于并发症可能会延迟,可能会发生计划外的ICU再入院。因此,在本研究中,我们评估了aSAH后再入院的比率和相关因素,并确定再入院是否与不良临床结果相关。方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2019年12月ICU收治的所有接受手术或血管内治疗的aSAH患者的病历。我们根据再入院情况对患者进行分类,并分析其临床参数。结果:345例首次ICU住院后转至病房监护的患者(2组)中,27例(7.3%)再次入住ICU(1组)。高血压史(HTN)、初始格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)评分、改良Fisher分级和首次ICU住院时血管痉挛治疗在两组之间有显著差异。再入院最常见的原因是延迟性脑缺血(DCI;70.3%;或5.545;95% ci 1.25-24.52;p = 0.024)。合并症HTN (OR 5.311;95% ci 1.75-16.12;p=0.03)和首次ICU住院时血管痉挛治疗(OR 7.234;95% ci 2.41-21.7;P <0.01)也与再入院相关。再入院患者住院时间较长,出院时GCS评分较低(p<0.01)。结论:DCI是aSAH患者再入院的最常见原因。再入院可能表明临床恶化,应监测DCI高危患者以防止再入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Curative transvenous embolization for congenital multi-hole pial arteriovenous fistula. Flow diverter stenting for intracranial aneurysms in the pediatric population: Two case reports and literature review. Surgical considerations and techniques using intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for ethmoidal dural arteriovenous fistula. Navigation guided small craniectomy and direct cannulation of pure isolated sigmoid sinus for treatment of dural arteriovenous fistula. Treatment of a posterior cerebral artery aneurysm in the context of complex cardio-cerebrovascular variations using the Tubridge flow diverter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1