Impact attenuation provided by older adult protective headwear products during simulated fall-related head impacts.

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering Pub Date : 2021-10-29 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20556683211050357
Daniel R Martel, Michelle R Tanel, Andrew C Laing
{"title":"Impact attenuation provided by older adult protective headwear products during simulated fall-related head impacts.","authors":"Daniel R Martel, Michelle R Tanel, Andrew C Laing","doi":"10.1177/20556683211050357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While protective headwear products (PHP) are designed to protect older adults from fall-related head injuries, there are limited data on their protective capacity. This study's goal was to assess the impact attenuation provided by commercially available PHP during simulated head impacts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A drop tower and Hybrid III headform measured the decrease in peak linear acceleration (<i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> ) provided by 12 PHP for front- and back-of-head impacts at low (clinically relevant: 3.5 m/s) and high (5.7 m/s) impact velocities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range of <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> across PHP was larger at the low velocity (56% and 41% for back and frontal impacts, respectively) vs. high velocity condition (27% and 38% for back and frontal impacts, respectively). A significant interaction between impact location and velocity was observed (<i>p</i> < .05), with significantly greater <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> for back-of-head compared to front-of-head impacts at the low impact velocity (19% mean difference). While not significant, there was a modest positive association between <i>g</i> <sub><i>atten</i></sub> and product padding thickness for back-of-head impacts (<i>p</i> = .095; r = 0.349).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the wide range in impact attenuation across commercially available PHP, and suggests that existing products provide greater impact attenuation during back-of-head impacts. These data may inform evidence-based decisions for clinicians and consumers and help drive industry innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/15/10.1177_20556683211050357.PMC8645304.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683211050357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While protective headwear products (PHP) are designed to protect older adults from fall-related head injuries, there are limited data on their protective capacity. This study's goal was to assess the impact attenuation provided by commercially available PHP during simulated head impacts.

Methods: A drop tower and Hybrid III headform measured the decrease in peak linear acceleration (g atten ) provided by 12 PHP for front- and back-of-head impacts at low (clinically relevant: 3.5 m/s) and high (5.7 m/s) impact velocities.

Results: The range of g atten across PHP was larger at the low velocity (56% and 41% for back and frontal impacts, respectively) vs. high velocity condition (27% and 38% for back and frontal impacts, respectively). A significant interaction between impact location and velocity was observed (p < .05), with significantly greater g atten for back-of-head compared to front-of-head impacts at the low impact velocity (19% mean difference). While not significant, there was a modest positive association between g atten and product padding thickness for back-of-head impacts (p = .095; r = 0.349).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the wide range in impact attenuation across commercially available PHP, and suggests that existing products provide greater impact attenuation during back-of-head impacts. These data may inform evidence-based decisions for clinicians and consumers and help drive industry innovation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人防护帽产品在模拟与坠落有关的头部撞击中提供的撞击衰减。
导言:虽然防护头饰产品(PHP)旨在保护老年人免受与跌倒相关的头部伤害,但有关其保护能力的数据却十分有限。本研究的目的是评估市售 PHP 在模拟头部撞击时提供的撞击衰减:方法:通过落塔和 Hybrid III 头模测量了 12 个 PHP 在低速(临床相关:3.5 m/s)和高速(5.7 m/s)冲击下对前额和后脑冲击所提供的峰值线性加速度(g atten)的衰减情况:结果:在低速撞击(正面和背面分别为 56% 和 41%)和高速撞击(正面和背面分别为 27% 和 38%)条件下,不同 PHP 的 g atten 范围更大。撞击位置和撞击速度之间存在明显的交互作用(p < .05),在低撞击速度下,头后部撞击的g atten明显高于头前部撞击(平均差异为19%)。头后部撞击的 g atten 与产品衬垫厚度之间存在适度的正相关关系(p = 0.095;r = 0.349),但意义不大:这项研究表明,市售 PHP 在冲击衰减方面存在很大差异,并表明现有产品在头后部撞击时可提供更大的冲击衰减。这些数据可为临床医生和消费者做出循证决策提供依据,并有助于推动行业创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence approach for detecting and classifying abnormal behaviour in older adults using wearable sensors. Designing feelings into lower-limb prostheses - A kansei engineering approach to understand lower-limb prosthetic cosmeses. Public opinion on types of voice systems for older adults. Initial feasibility evaluation of the RISES system: An innovative and activity-based closed-loop framework for spinal cord injury rehabilitation and recovery. Inclusive rehabilitation and assistive technologies development: An exploration of considerations, principles, and stakeholder engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1