Aung Pyae Phyo, Prabin Dahal, Mayfong Mayxay, Elizabeth A Ashley
{"title":"Clinical impact of vivax malaria: A collection review.","authors":"Aung Pyae Phyo, Prabin Dahal, Mayfong Mayxay, Elizabeth A Ashley","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1003890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plasmodium vivax infects an estimated 7 million people every year. Previously, vivax malaria was perceived as a benign condition, particularly when compared to falciparum malaria. Reports of the severe clinical impacts of vivax malaria have been increasing over the last decade.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We describe the main clinical impacts of vivax malaria, incorporating a rapid systematic review of severe disease with meta-analysis of data from studies with clearly defined denominators, stratified by hospitalization status. Severe anemia is a serious consequence of relapsing infections in children in endemic areas, in whom vivax malaria causes increased morbidity and mortality and impaired school performance. P. vivax infection in pregnancy is associated with maternal anemia, prematurity, fetal loss, and low birth weight. More than 11,658 patients with severe vivax malaria have been reported since 1929, with 15,954 manifestations of severe malaria, of which only 7,157 (45%) conformed to the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria. Out of 423 articles, 311 (74%) were published since 2010. In a random-effects meta-analysis of 85 studies, 68 of which were in hospitalized patients with vivax malaria, we estimated the proportion of patients with WHO-defined severe disease as 0.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19% to 2.57%] in all patients with vivax malaria and 7.11% [95% CI 4.30% to 11.55%] in hospitalized patients. We estimated the mortality from vivax malaria as 0.01% [95% CI 0.00% to 0.07%] in all patients and 0.56% [95% CI 0.35% to 0.92%] in hospital settings. WHO-defined cerebral, respiratory, and renal severe complications were generally estimated to occur in fewer than 0.5% patients in all included studies. Limitations of this review include the observational nature and small size of most of the studies of severe vivax malaria, high heterogeneity of included studies which were predominantly in hospitalized patients (who were therefore more likely to be severely unwell), and high risk of bias including small study effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Young children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to adverse clinical impacts of vivax malaria, and preventing infections and relapse in this groups is a priority. Substantial evidence of severe presentations of vivax malaria has accrued over the last 10 years, but reporting is inconsistent. There are major knowledge gaps, for example, limited understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and the reason for the heterogenous geographical distribution of reported complications. An adapted case definition of severe vivax malaria would facilitate surveillance and future research to better understand this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20368,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"e1003890"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8765657/pdf/","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22
Abstract
Background: Plasmodium vivax infects an estimated 7 million people every year. Previously, vivax malaria was perceived as a benign condition, particularly when compared to falciparum malaria. Reports of the severe clinical impacts of vivax malaria have been increasing over the last decade.
Methods and findings: We describe the main clinical impacts of vivax malaria, incorporating a rapid systematic review of severe disease with meta-analysis of data from studies with clearly defined denominators, stratified by hospitalization status. Severe anemia is a serious consequence of relapsing infections in children in endemic areas, in whom vivax malaria causes increased morbidity and mortality and impaired school performance. P. vivax infection in pregnancy is associated with maternal anemia, prematurity, fetal loss, and low birth weight. More than 11,658 patients with severe vivax malaria have been reported since 1929, with 15,954 manifestations of severe malaria, of which only 7,157 (45%) conformed to the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria. Out of 423 articles, 311 (74%) were published since 2010. In a random-effects meta-analysis of 85 studies, 68 of which were in hospitalized patients with vivax malaria, we estimated the proportion of patients with WHO-defined severe disease as 0.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19% to 2.57%] in all patients with vivax malaria and 7.11% [95% CI 4.30% to 11.55%] in hospitalized patients. We estimated the mortality from vivax malaria as 0.01% [95% CI 0.00% to 0.07%] in all patients and 0.56% [95% CI 0.35% to 0.92%] in hospital settings. WHO-defined cerebral, respiratory, and renal severe complications were generally estimated to occur in fewer than 0.5% patients in all included studies. Limitations of this review include the observational nature and small size of most of the studies of severe vivax malaria, high heterogeneity of included studies which were predominantly in hospitalized patients (who were therefore more likely to be severely unwell), and high risk of bias including small study effects.
Conclusions: Young children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to adverse clinical impacts of vivax malaria, and preventing infections and relapse in this groups is a priority. Substantial evidence of severe presentations of vivax malaria has accrued over the last 10 years, but reporting is inconsistent. There are major knowledge gaps, for example, limited understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and the reason for the heterogenous geographical distribution of reported complications. An adapted case definition of severe vivax malaria would facilitate surveillance and future research to better understand this condition.
背景:估计每年有700万人感染间日疟原虫。以前,间日疟疾被认为是一种良性疾病,特别是与恶性疟疾相比。关于间日疟疾严重临床影响的报告在过去十年中不断增加。方法和发现:我们描述了间日疟的主要临床影响,结合了对重症疾病的快速系统回顾和对来自具有明确定义的指标的研究数据的荟萃分析,并按住院情况分层。严重贫血是流行地区儿童反复感染疾病的严重后果,在这些地区,间日疟疾导致发病率和死亡率增加,并损害学习成绩。妊娠期间日疟原虫感染与母体贫血、早产、胎儿丢失和低出生体重有关。自1929年以来,报告了11,658名严重间日疟疾患者,其中15,954例表现为严重疟疾,其中只有7,157例(45%)符合世界卫生组织(世卫组织)的诊断标准。在423篇文章中,311篇(74%)是2010年以后发表的。在对85项研究(其中68项针对住院间日疟疾患者)的随机效应荟萃分析中,我们估计所有间日疟疾患者中患有世卫组织定义的严重疾病的比例为0.7%[95%可信区间(CI) 0.19%至2.57%],住院患者中患有世卫组织定义的严重疾病的比例为7.11% [95% CI 4.30%至11.55%]。我们估计所有患者中间日疟疾的死亡率为0.01% [95% CI 0.00%至0.07%],医院环境中的死亡率为0.56% [95% CI 0.35%至0.92%]。在所有纳入的研究中,一般估计世卫组织定义的脑、呼吸和肾脏严重并发症发生率低于0.5%。本综述的局限性包括:大多数严重间日疟研究的观察性和小规模,纳入的研究主要是住院患者(因此更有可能出现严重不适)的高异质性,以及包括小研究效应在内的高偏倚风险。结论:幼儿和孕妇特别容易受到间日疟疾的不良临床影响,预防这一群体的感染和复发是一个重点。在过去十年中积累了大量关于间日疟疾严重表现的证据,但报告不一致。存在重大的知识空白,例如,对潜在病理生理学的理解有限,以及报道的并发症地理分布不均的原因。对严重间日疟疾进行调整后的病例定义将促进监测和未来的研究,以便更好地了解这种情况。
期刊介绍:
PLOS Medicine aims to be a leading platform for research and analysis on the global health challenges faced by humanity. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedicine, the environment, society, and politics, that affect the well-being of individuals worldwide. It particularly highlights studies that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or our understanding of disease mechanisms, with the ultimate goal of improving health outcomes in diverse settings.
Unwavering in its commitment to ethical standards, PLOS Medicine ensures integrity in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and transparently disclosing any conflicts of interest during the reporting, peer review, and publication processes. The journal promotes transparency by providing visibility into the review and publication procedures. It also encourages data sharing and the reuse of published work. Author rights are upheld, allowing them to retain copyright. Furthermore, PLOS Medicine strongly supports Open Access publishing, making research articles freely available to all without restrictions, facilitating widespread dissemination of knowledge. The journal does not endorse drug or medical device advertising and refrains from exclusive sales of reprints to avoid conflicts of interest.