[Resource requirements in the surgical treatment of COVID‑19 patients at a university clinic of maximum care].

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Chirurg Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-10 DOI:10.1007/s00104-021-01547-x
H Kerndl, D Liebetrau, S Zerwes, C Römmele, A Hyhlik-Dürr
{"title":"[Resource requirements in the surgical treatment of COVID‑19 patients at a university clinic of maximum care].","authors":"H Kerndl,&nbsp;D Liebetrau,&nbsp;S Zerwes,&nbsp;C Römmele,&nbsp;A Hyhlik-Dürr","doi":"10.1007/s00104-021-01547-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical procedures in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) are possible under strict hygiene and protective measures and are currently carried out regularly. This study examined how much additional work this involves.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A structured evaluation of 71 surgical procedures performed at the Augsburg University Hospital between 1 November 2020 until 31 December 2020 was carried out. The operations on COVID‑19 patients were compared to procedures on non-COVID‑19 patients with respect to temporal, structural and staff resources, exemplified by four interventions: transbrachial embolectomy, total hip arthroplasty (H-TEP), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A) and new implantations of cardiac pacemakers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incision to suture times between the interventions in patients with COVID‑19 and non-COVID‑19 patients did not show any significant differences in any of the four interventions evaluated. The postoperative monitoring in the operating room, which is identified as time-consuming in many interventions, was often circumvented by postoperative transfer to the intensive care unit or by the use of local anesthetic procedures. For major operations, such as H‑TEP, the preparation time was shown to be significantly longer (p = 0.037). Furthermore, there was a significantly higher requirement for anesthesia nursing personnel of 1.5 vs. 1.0 (p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A quantification of the additional effort of operative treatment is difficult due to the already complex care of COVID‑19 patients; however, it can be assumed that there is an increased need for additional human and structural resources due to the supply of material from outside the operating room, which is not documented in the standard recording.</p>","PeriodicalId":50700,"journal":{"name":"Chirurg","volume":"93 1","pages":"64-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8661830/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurg","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-021-01547-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical procedures in patients suffering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) are possible under strict hygiene and protective measures and are currently carried out regularly. This study examined how much additional work this involves.

Material and methods: A structured evaluation of 71 surgical procedures performed at the Augsburg University Hospital between 1 November 2020 until 31 December 2020 was carried out. The operations on COVID‑19 patients were compared to procedures on non-COVID‑19 patients with respect to temporal, structural and staff resources, exemplified by four interventions: transbrachial embolectomy, total hip arthroplasty (H-TEP), proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A) and new implantations of cardiac pacemakers.

Results: The incision to suture times between the interventions in patients with COVID‑19 and non-COVID‑19 patients did not show any significant differences in any of the four interventions evaluated. The postoperative monitoring in the operating room, which is identified as time-consuming in many interventions, was often circumvented by postoperative transfer to the intensive care unit or by the use of local anesthetic procedures. For major operations, such as H‑TEP, the preparation time was shown to be significantly longer (p = 0.037). Furthermore, there was a significantly higher requirement for anesthesia nursing personnel of 1.5 vs. 1.0 (p = 0.02).

Conclusion: A quantification of the additional effort of operative treatment is difficult due to the already complex care of COVID‑19 patients; however, it can be assumed that there is an increased need for additional human and structural resources due to the supply of material from outside the operating room, which is not documented in the standard recording.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[大学最高护理诊所对COVID - 19患者手术治疗的资源需求]。
背景:在严格的卫生和防护措施下,2019冠状病毒病(COVID - 19)患者可以进行外科手术,目前定期进行手术。这项研究调查了这需要多少额外的工作。材料和方法:对2020年11月1日至2020年12月31日期间在奥格斯堡大学医院进行的71例外科手术进行了结构化评估。将COVID - 19患者的手术与非COVID - 19患者的手术在时间、结构和人员资源方面进行比较,以四种干预措施为例:经肱动脉栓塞切除术、全髋关节置换术(H-TEP)、股近端钉防旋术(PFN-A)和新的心脏起搏器植入。结果:在评估的四种干预措施中,COVID - 19患者和非COVID - 19患者的切口到缝合时间均无显著差异。在许多干预措施中,手术室的术后监测被认为是耗时的,通常通过术后转移到重症监护病房或使用局部麻醉程序来规避。对于重大手术,如H‑TEP,准备时间明显更长(p = 0.037)。对麻醉护理人员的要求为1.5比1.0,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。结论:由于COVID - 19患者的护理已经很复杂,很难量化手术治疗的额外工作量;然而,可以假定,由于从手术室外提供的材料没有记录在标准记录中,因此对额外的人力和结构资源的需求增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurg
Chirurg 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen The magazine is intended for surgeons in hospitals, clinics and research. Each issue includes a comprehensive theme: Practical summaries access to selected topics and provide the reader with a compilation of current knowledge in all fields of surgery. Besides imparting relevant background knowledge, the emphasis is on the review of scientific results and practical experience. The reader will find concrete recommendations.
期刊最新文献
[Elective colorectal fast-track resections-Treatment adherence due to coordination by specialized nursing personnel]. [Anal incontinence]. [Impact of the Nursing Personnel Strengthening Act on minimally invasive surgery exemplified by right-sided hemicolectomy from an economic perspective]. [Molecule pathology in the treatment of lung cancer-Interdisciplinary view of the importance in thoracic surgery]. [Is there an indication for thyroidectomy in cases of minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1