Fertility preservation discussions, referral and follow-up in male-to-female and female-to-male adolescent transgender patients.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human Fertility Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2021.2015804
Allison S Komorowski, Andrew R Fisher, Emily S Jungheim, Christopher S Lewis, Kenan R Omurtag
{"title":"Fertility preservation discussions, referral and follow-up in male-to-female and female-to-male adolescent transgender patients.","authors":"Allison S Komorowski, Andrew R Fisher, Emily S Jungheim, Christopher S Lewis, Kenan R Omurtag","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2021.2015804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The number of patients seeking transgender healthcare is growing, and there is a potential impact of gender-affirming therapies on fertility. The use of fertility preservation (FP), particularly among transgender adolescents, has been limited. We aimed to examine differences in FP counselling, referral and utilisation between male-to-female (MtF) and female-to-male (FtM) transgender adolescents. A retrospective review of the medical records of patients ages 12-17 seen at an academic medical centre between 2012 and 2017 with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria was conducted. A total of 22 MtF and 45 FtM adolescents were included. The counselling on the potential fertility impact of gender-affirming therapy was documented in 55%, and of those counselled, 73% were counselled before receiving medication. There was no significant difference between the timing of counselling for MtF versus FtM adolescents. Of patients with documented reproductive wishes, 77% reported either desire for adopted children or no desire for biological children. Among patients offered FP referral, 2 (22.2%) MtF and 3 (12.5%) FtM patients accepted; both MtF patients cryopreserved sperm. While most adolescents were counselled on the fertility impact of gender-affirming therapy, there is room for improvement as 45% of patients had no documented counselling. The rate of transgender adolescents pursuing FP consultation and gamete cryopreservation was low, consistent with prior studies in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":" ","pages":"903-907"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.2015804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The number of patients seeking transgender healthcare is growing, and there is a potential impact of gender-affirming therapies on fertility. The use of fertility preservation (FP), particularly among transgender adolescents, has been limited. We aimed to examine differences in FP counselling, referral and utilisation between male-to-female (MtF) and female-to-male (FtM) transgender adolescents. A retrospective review of the medical records of patients ages 12-17 seen at an academic medical centre between 2012 and 2017 with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria was conducted. A total of 22 MtF and 45 FtM adolescents were included. The counselling on the potential fertility impact of gender-affirming therapy was documented in 55%, and of those counselled, 73% were counselled before receiving medication. There was no significant difference between the timing of counselling for MtF versus FtM adolescents. Of patients with documented reproductive wishes, 77% reported either desire for adopted children or no desire for biological children. Among patients offered FP referral, 2 (22.2%) MtF and 3 (12.5%) FtM patients accepted; both MtF patients cryopreserved sperm. While most adolescents were counselled on the fertility impact of gender-affirming therapy, there is room for improvement as 45% of patients had no documented counselling. The rate of transgender adolescents pursuing FP consultation and gamete cryopreservation was low, consistent with prior studies in this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男变女和女变男青少年变性患者的生育力保护讨论、转诊和随访。
寻求变性医疗服务的患者人数不断增加,性别确认疗法可能会对生育产生影响。生育力保护(FP)的使用,尤其是在变性青少年中的使用一直很有限。我们旨在研究男变女(MtF)和女变男(FtM)变性青少年在生育力保存咨询、转诊和使用方面的差异。我们对 2012 年至 2017 年期间在一家学术医疗中心就诊的 12-17 岁、诊断为性别障碍的患者的病历进行了回顾性审查。共纳入了22名MtF和45名FtM青少年。55%的人接受过关于性别确认疗法对生育的潜在影响的咨询,其中73%的人在接受药物治疗前接受了咨询。接受性别确认治疗的青少年与接受性别确认治疗的青少年在接受咨询的时间上没有明显差异。在有生育意愿记录的患者中,77%表示希望收养子女或不希望生育亲生子女。在接受 FP 转诊的患者中,2 名(22.2%)MtF 患者和 3 名(12.5%)FtM 患者接受了转诊;两名 MtF 患者都冷冻了精子。虽然大多数青少年都接受了关于性别确认疗法对生育的影响的咨询,但仍有改进的余地,因为 45% 的患者没有接受过有据可查的咨询。变性青少年接受计划生育咨询和配子冷冻保存的比例较低,这与之前针对该人群的研究结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
期刊最新文献
Do very young oocyte donors negatively impact live birth rates in their recipients? The infected blood inquiry report-lessons for gamete donation. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancy from donated frozen versus fresh oocytes. Mpox in assisted conception: should we be worried about this monkey wrench? Prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): British Fertility Society policy and practice guideline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1