Liver Involvement by Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Systematic Review.

Jingjing Jiao, Lanjing Zhang
{"title":"Liver Involvement by Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Jingjing Jiao,&nbsp;Lanjing Zhang","doi":"10.14218/jctp.2021.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Liver penetration by a confined perforation of peptic ulcer is a rare but severe event. Its clinical and pathological features are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 41 qualified English publications were identified using the PubMed database and one in-house case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 42 patients, 20 patients had liver involvement by a perforated duodenal ulcer and 22 by a gastric ulcer. Among the 23 cases of known ulcer histology, 2 ulcers were malignant and were adenocarcinomas in the gastric remnant and the remaining 21 ulcers were confirmed as histologically benign (for frequency of malignancy in duodenal versus gastric ulcers, <i>p</i> = 0.48). The presence of hepatocytes was the clue of diagnosis for 19 cases. The median ages of the patients were 64.5 years (95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 53.40-71.90) for duodenal ulcer and 65.5 years (95% CI: 59.23-70.95) for gastric ulcer, respectively. The male to female ratio was 1.5:1 for duodenal ulcers and 2:1 for gastric ulcers. Patients with liver involvement of a perforated gastric ulcer were more likely to have a larger ulcer (median largest dimension, 4.75 cm versus 2.5 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.014). Female patients with liver involvement of a gastric ulcer were older than male patients (median age 72 versus 60 years, <i>p</i> = 0.045). There were no differences in gender, region (Asia, Europe, America versus others), use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 15), <i>H. Pylori</i> positivity (n = 10), possible history of peptic ulcer disease (n = 19) or mortality (n = 32) between duodenal and gastric ulcers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful histologic examination, clinicopathological correlation, and immunohistochemistry are critical to establish the diagnosis and avoid misdiagnosing liver involvement as malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and translational pathology","volume":"1 1","pages":"2-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0c/3b/nihms-1716510.PMC8681229.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and translational pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14218/jctp.2021.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Liver penetration by a confined perforation of peptic ulcer is a rare but severe event. Its clinical and pathological features are unclear.

Methods: In total, 41 qualified English publications were identified using the PubMed database and one in-house case.

Results: Among the 42 patients, 20 patients had liver involvement by a perforated duodenal ulcer and 22 by a gastric ulcer. Among the 23 cases of known ulcer histology, 2 ulcers were malignant and were adenocarcinomas in the gastric remnant and the remaining 21 ulcers were confirmed as histologically benign (for frequency of malignancy in duodenal versus gastric ulcers, p = 0.48). The presence of hepatocytes was the clue of diagnosis for 19 cases. The median ages of the patients were 64.5 years (95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 53.40-71.90) for duodenal ulcer and 65.5 years (95% CI: 59.23-70.95) for gastric ulcer, respectively. The male to female ratio was 1.5:1 for duodenal ulcers and 2:1 for gastric ulcers. Patients with liver involvement of a perforated gastric ulcer were more likely to have a larger ulcer (median largest dimension, 4.75 cm versus 2.5 cm, p = 0.014). Female patients with liver involvement of a gastric ulcer were older than male patients (median age 72 versus 60 years, p = 0.045). There were no differences in gender, region (Asia, Europe, America versus others), use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 15), H. Pylori positivity (n = 10), possible history of peptic ulcer disease (n = 19) or mortality (n = 32) between duodenal and gastric ulcers.

Conclusions: Careful histologic examination, clinicopathological correlation, and immunohistochemistry are critical to establish the diagnosis and avoid misdiagnosing liver involvement as malignancy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
穿孔性消化性溃疡累及肝脏:一项系统综述。
背景与目的:消化性溃疡狭窄穿孔穿透肝脏是一种罕见但严重的事件。其临床和病理特征尚不清楚。方法:使用PubMed数据库和1例内部病例共鉴定出41篇合格的英文出版物。结果:42例患者中,20例因十二指肠溃疡穿孔累及肝脏,22例因胃溃疡累及肝脏。在已知的23例溃疡组织学中,2例溃疡为恶性,为残胃腺癌,其余21例溃疡组织学上为良性(十二指肠溃疡与胃溃疡恶性发生率比较,p = 0.48)。肝细胞的存在为19例的诊断线索。十二指肠溃疡患者的中位年龄为64.5岁(95%可信区间[CI] 53.40 ~ 71.90),胃溃疡患者的中位年龄为65.5岁(95% CI: 59.23 ~ 70.95)。十二指肠溃疡男女比例为1.5:1,胃溃疡男女比例为2:1。胃溃疡穿孔累及肝脏的患者更有可能出现更大的溃疡(最大尺寸中位数,4.75 cm对2.5 cm, p = 0.014)。胃溃疡累及肝脏的女性患者比男性患者年龄大(中位年龄72岁对60岁,p = 0.045)。在性别、地区(亚洲、欧洲、美洲与其他地区)、使用非甾体抗炎药(n = 15)、幽门螺杆菌阳性(n = 10)、可能有消化性溃疡病史(n = 19)或死亡率(n = 32)方面,十二指肠溃疡和胃溃疡之间没有差异。结论:仔细的组织学检查,临床病理相关性和免疫组织化学对确定诊断和避免误诊肝脏受累为恶性肿瘤至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital and Artificial Intelligence-based Pathology: Not for Every Laboratory - A Mini-review on the Benefits and Pitfalls of Its Implementation. Hepatic Biliary Adenofibroma: Histological Characteristics, Diagnostic Challenges, and Its Role as a Precursor to Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. The World Health Organization System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology: Standardized Categories and Practical Approaches to Pancreatic Lesions. Histopathologic Features and Differential Diagnosis in Challenging Cases of Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant B-cell Lymphoma/Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma. A Review and Update on Therapy of Gastrointestinal Tract Tumors: From the Bench to Clinical Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1