Evaluating xanthochromia in the diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage in Scotland in the Era of modern computed tomography.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Scottish Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1177/00369330211072264
Stephen Rankin, Jacqueline McGuire, Mohamed Chekroud, Likhith Alakandy, Babu Mukhopadhyay
{"title":"Evaluating xanthochromia in the diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage in Scotland in the Era of modern computed tomography.","authors":"Stephen Rankin,&nbsp;Jacqueline McGuire,&nbsp;Mohamed Chekroud,&nbsp;Likhith Alakandy,&nbsp;Babu Mukhopadhyay","doi":"10.1177/00369330211072264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for xanthochromia is routinely used to exclude subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of xanthochromia (by NEQAS-spectrophotometry) in routine clinical practice in three acute hospitals, in patients with suspected SAH. We explored whether including CSF red cell count (RCC) with xanthochromia improved diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, all xanthochromia results were assessed over three consecutive years. Clinical information and Registry data were analysed to find all patients diagnosed with SAH. We correlated xanthochromia data with clinical and radiological findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 1761 xanthochromia performed. Of these, 26 (1.5%) were positive, 1624 (92%) negative and 72 (4.1%) were inconclusive. Of the 26 tests that were positive, 9 (35%) had confirmed SAH, 17 (65%) were falsely positive, with no false negative tests in our series. Xanthochromia identified 6% of all SAH diagnosed in the study. Incorporating RCC <1000 with xanthochromia, reducing false positive tests by 38% and inconclusive test by 85%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive yield of xanthochromia is low but identified 6% of SAH. NEQAS-spectrophotometry is an excellent diagnostic method with 100% sensitivity, 99% specificity. Incorporating RCC markedly reduces false positive and inconclusive tests reducing need for further imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":"67 2","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330211072264","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis for xanthochromia is routinely used to exclude subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). In this study, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of xanthochromia (by NEQAS-spectrophotometry) in routine clinical practice in three acute hospitals, in patients with suspected SAH. We explored whether including CSF red cell count (RCC) with xanthochromia improved diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: In this retrospective analysis, all xanthochromia results were assessed over three consecutive years. Clinical information and Registry data were analysed to find all patients diagnosed with SAH. We correlated xanthochromia data with clinical and radiological findings.

Results: There were 1761 xanthochromia performed. Of these, 26 (1.5%) were positive, 1624 (92%) negative and 72 (4.1%) were inconclusive. Of the 26 tests that were positive, 9 (35%) had confirmed SAH, 17 (65%) were falsely positive, with no false negative tests in our series. Xanthochromia identified 6% of all SAH diagnosed in the study. Incorporating RCC <1000 with xanthochromia, reducing false positive tests by 38% and inconclusive test by 85%.

Conclusion: The positive yield of xanthochromia is low but identified 6% of SAH. NEQAS-spectrophotometry is an excellent diagnostic method with 100% sensitivity, 99% specificity. Incorporating RCC markedly reduces false positive and inconclusive tests reducing need for further imaging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在现代计算机断层扫描时代评价黄色症对苏格兰蛛网膜下腔出血的诊断价值。
目的:脑脊液(CSF)分析是排除蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的常规方法。在本研究中,我们在三家急性医院的常规临床实践中,对疑似SAH患者的黄色症(通过neqas分光光度法)的敏感性和特异性进行了评估。我们探讨了CSF红细胞计数(RCC)与黄色症是否能提高诊断准确性。方法:在回顾性分析中,对所有黄色症结果进行连续三年的评估。分析临床信息和注册数据以发现所有诊断为SAH的患者。我们将黄色症数据与临床和放射学结果相关联。结果:检出黄色症1761例。其中阳性26例(1.5%),阴性1624例(92%),不确定72例(4.1%)。在26例阳性试验中,9例(35%)确诊为SAH, 17例(65%)为假阳性,在我们的研究中没有假阴性试验。黄色症在研究中诊断的所有SAH中占6%。结论:黄色症的阳性检出率较低,但可检出6%的SAH。neqas分光光度法具有100%的灵敏度,99%的特异度。合并RCC可显著减少假阳性和不确定的检查,减少进一步影像学检查的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
The state of robotic surgery in Spain: Results of a national survey on robotic surgery. Influence of core stabilization exercise on physical function and muscle thickness in patients with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pancreatic insulinomas: Our 15-year surgical experience. Efficacy and outcomes of a highland prehospital trauma response team. Ribosome-binding protein-1 (RRBP1) expression in prostate carcinomas and its relationship with clinicopathological prognostic factors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1