Quit4hlth: a preliminary investigation of tobacco treatment with gain-framed and loss-framed text messages for quitline callers.

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Smoking Cessation Pub Date : 2020-09-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-21 DOI:10.1017/jsc.2020.17
Alana M Rojewski, Lindsay R Duncan, Allison J Carroll, Anthony Brown, Amy Latimer-Cheung, Paula Celestino, Christine Sheffer, Andrew Hyland, Benjamin A Toll
{"title":"Quit4hlth: a preliminary investigation of tobacco treatment with gain-framed and loss-framed text messages for quitline callers.","authors":"Alana M Rojewski,&nbsp;Lindsay R Duncan,&nbsp;Allison J Carroll,&nbsp;Anthony Brown,&nbsp;Amy Latimer-Cheung,&nbsp;Paula Celestino,&nbsp;Christine Sheffer,&nbsp;Andrew Hyland,&nbsp;Benjamin A Toll","doi":"10.1017/jsc.2020.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent evidence suggests that quitline text messaging is an effective treatment for smoking cessation, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of the message content.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>A pilot study of the effects of gain-framed (GF; focused on the benefits of quitting) versus loss-framed (LF; focused on the costs of continued smoking) text messages among smokers contacting a quitline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomized to receive LF (<i>N</i> = 300) or GF (<i>N</i> = 300) text messages for 30 weeks. Self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence and number of 24 h quit attempts were assessed at week 30. Intent-to-treat (ITT) and responder analyses for smoking cessation were conducted using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ITT analysis showed 17% of the GF group quit smoking compared to 15% in the LF group (<i>P</i> = 0.508). The responder analysis showed 44% of the GF group quit smoking compared to 35% in the LF group (<i>P</i> = 0.154). More participants in the GF group reported making a 24 h quit attempt compared to the LF group (98% vs. 93%, <i>P</i> = 0.046).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there were no differences in abstinence rates between groups at the week 30 follow-up, participants in the GF group made more quit attempts than those in the LF group.</p>","PeriodicalId":39350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","volume":"15 3","pages":"143-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/jsc.2020.17","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Smoking Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsc.2020.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests that quitline text messaging is an effective treatment for smoking cessation, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of the message content.

Aims: A pilot study of the effects of gain-framed (GF; focused on the benefits of quitting) versus loss-framed (LF; focused on the costs of continued smoking) text messages among smokers contacting a quitline.

Methods: Participants were randomized to receive LF (N = 300) or GF (N = 300) text messages for 30 weeks. Self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence and number of 24 h quit attempts were assessed at week 30. Intent-to-treat (ITT) and responder analyses for smoking cessation were conducted using logistic regression.

Results: The ITT analysis showed 17% of the GF group quit smoking compared to 15% in the LF group (P = 0.508). The responder analysis showed 44% of the GF group quit smoking compared to 35% in the LF group (P = 0.154). More participants in the GF group reported making a 24 h quit attempt compared to the LF group (98% vs. 93%, P = 0.046).

Conclusions: Although there were no differences in abstinence rates between groups at the week 30 follow-up, participants in the GF group made more quit attempts than those in the LF group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
戒烟热线呼叫者使用增益框和损失框短信进行烟草治疗的初步调查。
最近的证据表明,戒烟热线短信是一种有效的戒烟治疗方法,但人们对短信内容的相对有效性知之甚少。目的:对增益框架(GF;专注于戒烟的好处)和损失框架(LF;聚焦于继续吸烟的成本)吸烟者之间的短信联系戒烟热线。方法:参与者随机接受LF (N = 300)或GF (N = 300)短信,为期30周。自我报告的7天点患病率戒断和24小时戒烟尝试次数在第30周进行评估。使用逻辑回归对戒烟的意向治疗(ITT)和应答者进行分析。结果:ITT分析显示GF组戒烟率为17%,LF组为15% (P = 0.508)。应答者分析显示GF组有44%的人戒烟,而LF组只有35% (P = 0.154)。与LF组相比,GF组有更多的参与者报告在24小时内尝试戒烟(98%对93%,P = 0.046)。结论:虽然在第30周的随访中,两组之间的戒断率没有差异,但GF组的参与者比LF组的参与者有更多的戒烟尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Smoking Cessation
Journal of Smoking Cessation Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
"It Is A Carrot-Stick Model": A Qualitative Study of Rural-Serving Clinician and Rural-Residing Veteran Perceptions of Requirements to Quit Smoking prior to Elective Surgery. Prevalence, Correlates, and Perception of E-cigarettes among Undergraduate Students of Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study. The Evaluation of an Integrated Tobacco Treatment Specialist in Primary Care. The Efficacy of Individualized, Community-Based Physical Activity to Aid Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Effects of Smoking on COVID-19 Management and Mortality: An Umbrella Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1