Evaluation of Anatomic Features and Assessment Tools to Determine Treatment of Ankyloglossia.

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN Pub Date : 2021-09-15
John H Unkel, Cornelius Martin, Elizabeth J Berry, Shital N Patel, Dennis Reinhartz, Judy Reinhartz
{"title":"Evaluation of Anatomic Features and Assessment Tools to Determine Treatment of Ankyloglossia.","authors":"John H Unkel,&nbsp;Cornelius Martin,&nbsp;Elizabeth J Berry,&nbsp;Shital N Patel,&nbsp;Dennis Reinhartz,&nbsp;Judy Reinhartz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the use of lingual frenotomy assessment tools and the anatomical features most commonly used by dentists and otolaryngologists to determine if a frenotomy was indicated.<br/><b>Methods:</b> A nine-question survey was distributed to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry members and otolaryngologists in the American Medical Association. The survey consisted of three categories: (1) demographics; (2) use of a standardized assessment tool; and (3) assessing anatomical features for frenotomy. Three different cases of ankyloglossia were given to assess which anatomical features were used to determine if a frenotomy was needed.<br/><b>Results:</b> Subjects included 404 practitioners. The most common frenotomy assessment tool utilized was the Hazelbaker assessment tool, followed by the LATCH and Bristol tongue assessment tools. The anatomical features used by most responders in determining if a frenotomy was indicated were the appearance of the tongue when lifted, tongue protrusion, frenulum length, and frenulum type.<br/><b>Conclusions:</b> Many practitioners believe frenotomies for ankyloglossia are indicated when there is a functional impairment and an anatomical component. This study suggests that the general appearance of the tongue when lifted is the most common anatomical feature used for assessing the need for a frenotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":51605,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the use of lingual frenotomy assessment tools and the anatomical features most commonly used by dentists and otolaryngologists to determine if a frenotomy was indicated.
Methods: A nine-question survey was distributed to American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry members and otolaryngologists in the American Medical Association. The survey consisted of three categories: (1) demographics; (2) use of a standardized assessment tool; and (3) assessing anatomical features for frenotomy. Three different cases of ankyloglossia were given to assess which anatomical features were used to determine if a frenotomy was needed.
Results: Subjects included 404 practitioners. The most common frenotomy assessment tool utilized was the Hazelbaker assessment tool, followed by the LATCH and Bristol tongue assessment tools. The anatomical features used by most responders in determining if a frenotomy was indicated were the appearance of the tongue when lifted, tongue protrusion, frenulum length, and frenulum type.
Conclusions: Many practitioners believe frenotomies for ankyloglossia are indicated when there is a functional impairment and an anatomical component. This study suggests that the general appearance of the tongue when lifted is the most common anatomical feature used for assessing the need for a frenotomy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估解剖学特征和评估工具,以确定治疗强直性咬合。
目的:评估舌骨切开术评估工具的使用,以及牙医和耳鼻喉科医生最常用的解剖特征,以确定是否需要行舌骨切开术。方法:对美国儿科牙科学会会员和美国医学协会耳鼻喉科医师进行9个问题的调查。调查包括三个方面:(1)人口统计;(2)使用标准化的评估工具;(3)评估截骨术的解剖特征。三个不同的病例的强直性咬合给出了评估哪些解剖特征,以确定是否需要进行截骨术。结果:受试者包括404名从业人员。最常用的截骨术评估工具是Hazelbaker评估工具,其次是LATCH和Bristol舌部评估工具。大多数应答者在确定是否需要行截骨术时使用的解剖学特征是舌被提起时的外观、舌突、系带长度和系带类型。结论:许多从业人员认为,当存在功能损伤和解剖成分时,应采用系骨切开术治疗系骨紧闭。这项研究表明,舌被提起时的总体外观是评估是否需要进行截骨手术的最常见解剖特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Acquired after the merger between the American Society of Dentistry for Children and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry in 2002, the Journal of Dentistry for Children (JDC) is an internationally renowned journal whose publishing dates back to 1934. Published three times a year, JDC promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. It covers a wide range of topics related to the clinical care of children, from clinical techniques of daily importance to the practitioner, to studies on child behavior and growth and development. JDC also provides information on the physical, psychological and emotional conditions of children as they relate to and affect their dental health.
期刊最新文献
Acceptance of Behavior Guidance Techniques in Pediatric Dentistry Between American and Colombian Parents. Angioleiomyomatous Hamartoma of Incisive Papilla in an Adolescent. Caregivers' Perceptions of Dental Therapists. Clinical Implications of Temporomandibular Condyle Agenesis in a Toddler. COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Behavioral and Attitudinal Changes in Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1