Posterior Wall Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Effects on Echocardiographic Parameters of cardiac function.

Q3 Medicine Journal of atrial fibrillation Pub Date : 2020-10-31 eCollection Date: 2020-10-01 DOI:10.4022/jafib.2315
Xin Zhang, Neil Beri, Pankaj Malhotra, Rakhee Makhija, Eric Nordsieck, Adam Oesterle, Dali Fan, Nayereh Pezeshkian, Uma Srivatsa
{"title":"Posterior Wall Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Effects on Echocardiographic Parameters of cardiac function.","authors":"Xin Zhang,&nbsp;Neil Beri,&nbsp;Pankaj Malhotra,&nbsp;Rakhee Makhija,&nbsp;Eric Nordsieck,&nbsp;Adam Oesterle,&nbsp;Dali Fan,&nbsp;Nayereh Pezeshkian,&nbsp;Uma Srivatsa","doi":"10.4022/jafib.2315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVA) requires more ablation of left atrial tissue. We compared the effect of PWI versus non-PWI methods (CPVA + linear lesions) on echocardiographic parameters of left atrial and left ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected patients who had pre and post ablation echocardiogram at our institution. Parameters assessed were: Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (VTI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), atrial Doppler velocity across mitral valve (A), E/E', and deceleration time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 72 patients studied, 32.5% had PWA in addition to CPVA. The mean duration between echocardiograms was 650 + 542 days. PWA group had an average postoperative VTI 0.21 + 0.05 vs 0.21 + 0.05 in the non-PWA (p=0.61) group. Average improvement compared to pre ablation parameters: VTI was 0.03 + 0.06 vs 0.008 + 0.05 (p=0.17), postoperative A was 0.49 + 0.19 vs 0.57 + 0.19 (p=0.16), postoperative LVEF was 57.5 + 9.9% vs 57.8 + 10.8 % (p=0.89), with average change in LVEF 1.5 ± 7.8 vs 0.86 ± 9.7 (p=0.78) in PWA and non-PWA groups respectively. There was no significant difference in change in deceleration time or E/E' when comparing the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PWA did not adversely affect echocardiographic parameters of left atrial function or left ventricular systolic or diastolic function when compared to other types of ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","volume":"13 3","pages":"2315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8691332/pdf/jafib-13-02315.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of atrial fibrillation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4022/jafib.2315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Posterior wall isolation (PWI) in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVA) requires more ablation of left atrial tissue. We compared the effect of PWI versus non-PWI methods (CPVA + linear lesions) on echocardiographic parameters of left atrial and left ventricular function.

Methods: We selected patients who had pre and post ablation echocardiogram at our institution. Parameters assessed were: Left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (VTI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), atrial Doppler velocity across mitral valve (A), E/E', and deceleration time.

Results: Of the 72 patients studied, 32.5% had PWA in addition to CPVA. The mean duration between echocardiograms was 650 + 542 days. PWA group had an average postoperative VTI 0.21 + 0.05 vs 0.21 + 0.05 in the non-PWA (p=0.61) group. Average improvement compared to pre ablation parameters: VTI was 0.03 + 0.06 vs 0.008 + 0.05 (p=0.17), postoperative A was 0.49 + 0.19 vs 0.57 + 0.19 (p=0.16), postoperative LVEF was 57.5 + 9.9% vs 57.8 + 10.8 % (p=0.89), with average change in LVEF 1.5 ± 7.8 vs 0.86 ± 9.7 (p=0.78) in PWA and non-PWA groups respectively. There was no significant difference in change in deceleration time or E/E' when comparing the two groups.

Conclusions: PWA did not adversely affect echocardiographic parameters of left atrial function or left ventricular systolic or diastolic function when compared to other types of ablation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
房颤后壁隔离术对心功能超声心动图参数的影响。
背景:除环肺静脉隔离术(CPVA)外,后壁隔离术(PWI)需要更多的左心房组织消融。我们比较了PWI与非PWI方法(CPVA +线性病变)对左心房和左心室功能超声心动图参数的影响。方法:我们选择在本院进行消融前后超声心动图检查的患者。评估参数为:左室流出道速度时间积分(VTI)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、经二尖瓣的心房多普勒速度(A)、E/E′和减速时间。结果:在研究的72例患者中,32.5%的患者除CPVA外还有PWA。超声心动图间隔时间平均为650 + 542天。PWA组术后VTI平均值为0.21 + 0.05,非PWA组为0.21 + 0.05 (p=0.61)。与消融前参数相比,平均改善:VTI为0.03 + 0.06 vs 0.008 + 0.05 (p=0.17),术后A为0.49 + 0.19 vs 0.57 + 0.19 (p=0.16),术后LVEF为57.5 + 9.9% vs 57.8 + 10.8% (p=0.89), PWA组和非PWA组LVEF平均变化分别为1.5±7.8 vs 0.86±9.7 (p=0.78)。两组的减速时间和E/E′变化无显著性差异。结论:与其他消融术相比,PWA对左心房功能、左心室收缩和舒张功能的超声心动图参数没有不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of atrial fibrillation
Journal of atrial fibrillation Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in healthcare and the use of robotic technology - The Robotic Magnetic Navigation, to manage them in the field of electrophysiology | A single-center experience with case studies Atrial Fibrillation with Controlled Ventricular Rate and New-onset Heart Failure: Atypical Presentation, Worse Prognosis Psychological Stress Associated – Vagally Mediated Atrial Fibrillation: Personal Observation of a Possible Subtype Long-Term Rhythm and Echocardiographic Outcomes of Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction After DC Cardioversion For for Atrial Fibrillation Association Between New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1