Combining fMRI and Eye-tracking for the Study of Social Cognition.

IF 2.6 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Insights Pub Date : 2021-12-16 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26331055211065497
Kristin Marie Rusch
{"title":"Combining fMRI and Eye-tracking for the Study of Social Cognition.","authors":"Kristin Marie Rusch","doi":"10.1177/26331055211065497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of social cognition with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) affords the use of complex stimulus material. Visual attention to distinct aspects of these stimuli can result in the involvement of remarkably different neural systems. Usually, the influence of gaze on neural signal is either disregarded or dealt with by controlling gaze of participants through instructions or tasks. However, behavioral restrictions like this limit the study's ecological validity. Thus, it would be preferable if participants freely look at the stimuli while their gaze traces are measured. Yet several impediments hamper a combination of fMRI and eye-tracking. In our recent work on neural Theory of Mind processes in alexithymia, we propose a simple way of integrating dwell time on specific stimulus features into general linear models of fMRI data. By parametrically modeling fixations, we were able to distinguish neural processes asssociated with specific stimulus features looked at. Here, I discuss opportunities and obstacles of this approach in more detail. My goal is to motivate a wider use of parametric models - usually implemented in common fMRI software packages - to combine fMRI and eye-tracking data.</p>","PeriodicalId":36527,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience Insights","volume":" ","pages":"26331055211065497"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/c0/10.1177_26331055211065497.PMC8689432.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26331055211065497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study of social cognition with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) affords the use of complex stimulus material. Visual attention to distinct aspects of these stimuli can result in the involvement of remarkably different neural systems. Usually, the influence of gaze on neural signal is either disregarded or dealt with by controlling gaze of participants through instructions or tasks. However, behavioral restrictions like this limit the study's ecological validity. Thus, it would be preferable if participants freely look at the stimuli while their gaze traces are measured. Yet several impediments hamper a combination of fMRI and eye-tracking. In our recent work on neural Theory of Mind processes in alexithymia, we propose a simple way of integrating dwell time on specific stimulus features into general linear models of fMRI data. By parametrically modeling fixations, we were able to distinguish neural processes asssociated with specific stimulus features looked at. Here, I discuss opportunities and obstacles of this approach in more detail. My goal is to motivate a wider use of parametric models - usually implemented in common fMRI software packages - to combine fMRI and eye-tracking data.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合fMRI和眼动追踪技术研究社会认知。
功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究社会认知提供了复杂刺激材料的使用。对这些刺激的不同方面的视觉注意会导致涉及到显著不同的神经系统。通常,注视对神经信号的影响要么被忽略,要么通过指令或任务来控制被试的注视。然而,像这样的行为限制限制了研究的生态有效性。因此,如果参与者自由地看着刺激物,同时测量他们的注视轨迹,这将是可取的。然而,有几个障碍阻碍了功能磁共振成像和眼球追踪的结合。在我们最近对述情障碍的神经心理理论过程的研究中,我们提出了一种简单的方法,将特定刺激特征的停留时间整合到fMRI数据的一般线性模型中。通过参数化建模固定,我们能够区分与特定刺激特征相关的神经过程。在这里,我将更详细地讨论这种方法的机遇和障碍。我的目标是推动参数化模型的更广泛使用——通常在通用的功能磁共振成像软件包中实现——将功能磁共振成像和眼动追踪数据结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience Insights
Neuroscience Insights Neuroscience-Neuroscience (all)
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive Proteomic Profiling of Human Nav1.7-Interacting Proteins Reveals Conserved Regulatory Networks Involved in Nociceptive Signaling. Investigating Prospective Memory Processes: ERP Evidence from Novel Semantic Judgment Tasks. Sciatic Nerve Electrical Stimulation Enhances Locomotor Recovery in Rats Following Spinal Cord Contusion. The CHD Protein, Kismet, Restricts Synaptic BMP Signaling at Glutamatergic Synapses. Open Field Two-Texture Preference Testing Is Not Associated With the Neuropathic Pain-Like Phenotype That Occurs Following Mouse Cervical Contusion Spinal Cord Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1