[Risk Factors for COVID-19 transmission among healthcare workers].

Florin Ciorba Ciorba, Javier Flores Benítez, Raul Hernandez Iglesias, Joan Inglés Torruella, Mª Montserrat Olona Cabases
{"title":"[Risk Factors for COVID-19 transmission among healthcare workers].","authors":"Florin Ciorba Ciorba,&nbsp;Javier Flores Benítez,&nbsp;Raul Hernandez Iglesias,&nbsp;Joan Inglés Torruella,&nbsp;Mª Montserrat Olona Cabases","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2021.24.04.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Frontline healthcare workers are the first line of defense against Covid-19, resulting in a higher risk of infection. The objective of this study was to describe the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and its associated risk factors among professionals working in a healthcare consortium that includes different centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analytical observational study of 2620 healthcare workers; the project period began with the declaration of the state of alarm in Spain (March 15, 2020) and ended on June 21, 2020. We estimated associations between the independent variables sex, age, seniority, professional category and work location and confirmed COVID-19 as the outcome variable. Bivariate study analysis was based on chi-square test and simple logistic regression with calculation of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Multivariate analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p ≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All frontline healthcare worker categories were at higher risk than non-patient-facing personnel. Nurses had the highest risk [OR, 14.03 (3.19-61.66)]. With respect to work location, and as compared to non-patient-facing personnel, working in the surgical-medical-hospitalization-clinic [OR 13.43 (1.7-106.12)] and socio-health center [OR 17.77 (2.19-144.04) posed the greatest risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The greatest risk of acquiring COVID-19 was among patient-facing healthcare professionals working in areas where COVID-19 was detected among patients admitted for other pathologies. This risk was higher than in those areas designated for the care of COVID-19 patients, possibly due to differences in the use of personal protective equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"24 4","pages":"370-382"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2021.24.04.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Frontline healthcare workers are the first line of defense against Covid-19, resulting in a higher risk of infection. The objective of this study was to describe the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection and its associated risk factors among professionals working in a healthcare consortium that includes different centers.

Methods: This was a retrospective analytical observational study of 2620 healthcare workers; the project period began with the declaration of the state of alarm in Spain (March 15, 2020) and ended on June 21, 2020. We estimated associations between the independent variables sex, age, seniority, professional category and work location and confirmed COVID-19 as the outcome variable. Bivariate study analysis was based on chi-square test and simple logistic regression with calculation of the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Multivariate analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression. Statistical significance was set at p ≤0.05.

Results: All frontline healthcare worker categories were at higher risk than non-patient-facing personnel. Nurses had the highest risk [OR, 14.03 (3.19-61.66)]. With respect to work location, and as compared to non-patient-facing personnel, working in the surgical-medical-hospitalization-clinic [OR 13.43 (1.7-106.12)] and socio-health center [OR 17.77 (2.19-144.04) posed the greatest risks.

Conclusions: The greatest risk of acquiring COVID-19 was among patient-facing healthcare professionals working in areas where COVID-19 was detected among patients admitted for other pathologies. This risk was higher than in those areas designated for the care of COVID-19 patients, possibly due to differences in the use of personal protective equipment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[COVID-19在医护人员中传播的危险因素]。
目的:一线医护人员是防控新冠肺炎的第一道防线,感染风险较高。本研究的目的是描述在包括不同中心的医疗保健联盟中工作的专业人员中SARS-CoV-2感染及其相关危险因素的影响。方法:对2620名医护人员进行回顾性分析观察性研究;项目期间从西班牙宣布进入警戒状态(2020年3月15日)开始,至2020年6月21日结束。我们估计了自变量性别、年龄、资历、专业类别和工作地点之间的关联,并确认COVID-19为结果变量。双变量研究分析基于卡方检验和简单逻辑回归,计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(95% ci)。采用多元逻辑回归进行多因素分析。p≤0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:所有一线医护人员类别的风险均高于非面向患者的人员。护士的风险最高[OR, 14.03(3.19-61.66)]。就工作地点而言,与非面向患者的人员相比,在外科-医疗-住院-诊所[OR 13.43(1.7-106.12)]和社会卫生中心[OR 17.77(2.19-144.04)]工作的风险最大。结论:感染COVID-19的风险最大的是在其他病理入院的患者中检测到COVID-19的地区工作的面向患者的医护人员。这种风险高于那些指定用于照顾COVID-19患者的区域,可能是由于个人防护装备的使用差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa de posible origen laboral atendida en el Servicio Navarro de Salud. Navarra, España, 2017-2022 Producción científica en Scopus sobre salud financiera: periodo 2011-2022 Exposición a sílice de mineros en altitud. Dosis inhalada, método de evaluación en condición de hipobaria El sello de calidad FECYT, un reconocimiento y un estímulo para Archivos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1