Revisiting the indication for prophylactic contralateral mastectomy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome and breast cancer. Case report

Ximena Briceño-Morales, Clara Briceño-Morales, Silvia Inés Guerrero-Macías, Ana María Pedroza-Durán, Raúl Alexis Súarez-Rodríguez
{"title":"Revisiting the indication for prophylactic contralateral mastectomy in patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome and breast cancer. Case report","authors":"Ximena Briceño-Morales, Clara Briceño-Morales, Silvia Inés Guerrero-Macías, Ana María Pedroza-Durán, Raúl Alexis Súarez-Rodríguez","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the case of a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) and breast cancer in whom the benefit of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) was challenged; and to offer a critical discussion regarding the evidence supporting this procedure in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 37-year-old woman with breast cancer and a family history of multiple early onset cancer of the LFS spectrum in whom a pathogenic variant of the TP53 gene was confirmed during adjuvant hormonal therapy. The case was presented during the multidisciplinary meeting of the Breast Service of a referral oncology center in Colombia, in order to discuss the benefit of CPM. The decision of the board meeting was not to perform CPM. After 30 months of follow-up, the patient is disease-free.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no evidence on the impact of CPM on survival of patients with LFS and breast cancer in particular. However, in light of the current knowledge, it is not possible to generalize the approach of withholding this prophylactic surgery. It is important to report those cases in which the decision is made to either perform or omit this procedure in order to increase the body of evidence, considering the limitations that make it difficult to build large cohorts or conduct trials exclusively for this genetic disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/7c/2463-0225-rcog-72-03-3690.PMC8603825.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the case of a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) and breast cancer in whom the benefit of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) was challenged; and to offer a critical discussion regarding the evidence supporting this procedure in this patient population.

Case presentation: A 37-year-old woman with breast cancer and a family history of multiple early onset cancer of the LFS spectrum in whom a pathogenic variant of the TP53 gene was confirmed during adjuvant hormonal therapy. The case was presented during the multidisciplinary meeting of the Breast Service of a referral oncology center in Colombia, in order to discuss the benefit of CPM. The decision of the board meeting was not to perform CPM. After 30 months of follow-up, the patient is disease-free.

Conclusion: There is no evidence on the impact of CPM on survival of patients with LFS and breast cancer in particular. However, in light of the current knowledge, it is not possible to generalize the approach of withholding this prophylactic surgery. It is important to report those cases in which the decision is made to either perform or omit this procedure in order to increase the body of evidence, considering the limitations that make it difficult to build large cohorts or conduct trials exclusively for this genetic disorder.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视李-弗劳米尼综合征和乳腺癌患者预防性对侧乳房切除术的适应症。病例报告
目的描述一名患有李-弗劳米尼综合征(LFS)和乳腺癌的患者的病例,对该患者进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的益处提出了质疑;并对该患者群体中支持该手术的证据进行批判性讨论:病例介绍:一名 37 岁的女性乳腺癌患者,其家族史中曾有多例早发性 LFS 光谱癌症,在接受激素辅助治疗期间证实其 TP53 基因存在致病变异。该病例是在哥伦比亚一家肿瘤转诊中心乳腺科的多学科会议上提出的,目的是讨论 CPM 的益处。会议决定不实施 CPM。经过 30 个月的随访,患者已无疾病:目前还没有证据表明 CPM 对 LFS(尤其是乳腺癌)患者的生存有影响。然而,就目前的知识而言,还不能一概而论地认为应暂缓这种预防性手术。考虑到很难建立大规模的队列或专门针对这种遗传性疾病进行试验的局限性,报告那些决定实施或不实施该手术的病例以增加证据是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología was founded in January 1949. It is the Federación Colombiana de Asociaciones de Obstetricia y Ginecología"s official periodic publication (formerly known as the Sociedad Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología). It is published quarterly and the following abbreviation should be used when citing the journal: Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. The publication is authorized by Mingobierno resolution 218/1950.
期刊最新文献
Treatment of ectopic pregnancy implanted on cesarea scar: cohort study 2018-2022, Lima, Peru Risk factors associated with the need for insulin in patients with gestational diabetes in a reference hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina: retrospective cohort study Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in molecular breast cancer subtypes in Medellin, Colombia. Retrospective cohort study Thoughts about the teaching role in health education Management of postpartum hemorrhage in a patient with bicornuate uterus using the B-Lynch suture. Case report and review of the literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1