'Go fish': Conceptualising the challenges of engaging national web archives for digital research.

Jessica Ogden, Emily Maemura
{"title":"'Go fish': Conceptualising the challenges of engaging national web archives for digital research.","authors":"Jessica Ogden,&nbsp;Emily Maemura","doi":"10.1007/s42803-021-00032-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our work considers the sociotechnical and organisational constraints of web archiving in order to understand how these factors and contingencies influence research engagement with national web collections. In this article, we compare and contrast our experiences of undertaking web archival research at two national web archives: the UK Web Archive located at the British Library and the Netarchive at the Royal Danish Library. Based on personal interactions with the collections, interviews with library staff and observations of web archiving activities, we invoke three conceptual devices (<i>orientating, auditing</i> and <i>constructing</i>) to describe common research practices and associated challenges in the context of each national web archive. Through this framework we centre the early stages of the research process that are often only given cursory attention in methodological descriptions of web archival research, to discuss the epistemological entanglements of researcher practices, instruments, tools and methods that create the conditions of possibility for new knowledge and scholarship in this space. In this analysis, we highlight the significant time and energy required on the part of researchers to begin using national web archives, as well as the value of engaging with the curatorial infrastructure that enables web archiving in practice. Focusing an analysis on these research infrastructures facilitates a discussion of how these web archival interfaces both enable and foreclose on particular forms of researcher engagement with the past Web and in turn contributes to critical ongoing debates surrounding the opportunities and constraints of digital sources, methodologies and claims within the Digital Humanities.</p>","PeriodicalId":91018,"journal":{"name":"International journal of digital humanities","volume":"2 1-3","pages":"43-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s42803-021-00032-5","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of digital humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-021-00032-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Our work considers the sociotechnical and organisational constraints of web archiving in order to understand how these factors and contingencies influence research engagement with national web collections. In this article, we compare and contrast our experiences of undertaking web archival research at two national web archives: the UK Web Archive located at the British Library and the Netarchive at the Royal Danish Library. Based on personal interactions with the collections, interviews with library staff and observations of web archiving activities, we invoke three conceptual devices (orientating, auditing and constructing) to describe common research practices and associated challenges in the context of each national web archive. Through this framework we centre the early stages of the research process that are often only given cursory attention in methodological descriptions of web archival research, to discuss the epistemological entanglements of researcher practices, instruments, tools and methods that create the conditions of possibility for new knowledge and scholarship in this space. In this analysis, we highlight the significant time and energy required on the part of researchers to begin using national web archives, as well as the value of engaging with the curatorial infrastructure that enables web archiving in practice. Focusing an analysis on these research infrastructures facilitates a discussion of how these web archival interfaces both enable and foreclose on particular forms of researcher engagement with the past Web and in turn contributes to critical ongoing debates surrounding the opportunities and constraints of digital sources, methodologies and claims within the Digital Humanities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“去钓鱼”:概念化参与数字研究的国家网络档案的挑战。
我们的工作考虑了网络存档的社会技术和组织限制,以便了解这些因素和偶然事件如何影响与国家网络收藏的研究参与。在这篇文章中,我们比较和对比了我们在两个国家网络档案馆进行网络档案研究的经验:位于大英图书馆的英国网络档案馆和位于丹麦皇家图书馆的网络档案馆。基于与馆藏的个人互动、与图书馆工作人员的访谈以及对网络存档活动的观察,我们引用了三个概念装置(定向、审计和构建)来描述每个国家网络存档背景下的常见研究实践和相关挑战。通过这个框架,我们将研究过程的早期阶段(通常在网络档案研究的方法论描述中只得到粗略的关注)集中在一起,讨论研究人员实践、工具、工具和方法的认识论纠缠,这些实践、工具和方法为这一领域的新知识和学术创造了可能的条件。在这个分析中,我们强调了研究人员开始使用国家网络档案所需的大量时间和精力,以及参与使网络存档在实践中成为可能的策展基础设施的价值。对这些研究基础设施的分析有助于讨论这些网络档案接口如何使研究人员能够与过去的网络进行特定形式的接触,并反过来有助于围绕数字资源、方法和数字人文学科主张的机会和限制进行关键的持续辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RelChronVis: an interactive web application for visualizing the relative chronology of language changes DOLD: a digital platform for conducting online language experiments and surveys Correction: Committing to reproducibility and explainability: using Git as a research journal Correction: Committing to reproducibility and explainability: using Git as a research journal Open Times: The future of critique in the age of (un)replicability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1