Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Clinical Sepsis: Experience From a Single Rural Center in Central India.

IF 1.9 Q3 PATHOLOGY Clinical Pathology Pub Date : 2022-02-03 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2632010X221075592
Kavita Jain, Darshita Sharma, Mala Patidar, Shirish Nandedkar, Ashish Pathak, Manju Purohit
{"title":"Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients With Clinical Sepsis: Experience From a Single Rural Center in Central India.","authors":"Kavita Jain,&nbsp;Darshita Sharma,&nbsp;Mala Patidar,&nbsp;Shirish Nandedkar,&nbsp;Ashish Pathak,&nbsp;Manju Purohit","doi":"10.1177/2632010X221075592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early diagnosis of sepsis and its severity is essential for appropriate treatment to improve patient survival, especially in resource-limited settings. The aim of the present study was to study the role of red blood cell distribution (RDW) as a biomarker for the early detection of severe sepsis defined clinically and also in the prediction of mortality from sepsis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study included a total of 175 subjects who met the inclusion criteria for the diagnosis of severe sepsis. After a thorough clinical examination, blood samples were taken from all patients within 3 hours of presenting the disease. The RDW values and other investigations were studied on the day of admission compared to other severity markers with the mortality index of 30 days.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The RDW value was significantly higher in patients with severe sepsis and in non-survivor patients than in survivors (<i>P</i> < .0001). There was a strong correlation between the SOFA score and RDW in predicting the disease outcome with the Pearson correlation coefficient of <i>r</i> = .46. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was found to be 0.852 at a CI of 95% (0.796-0.909) with RDW 17.15, sensitivity was 88.6% and specificity was 63.5%. There was a positive correlation with Pearson's correlation coefficient of <i>r</i> = .46 between RDW and the SOFA score.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RDW can be used as a potential marker for the early detection of severe sepsis and in the prediction of the outcome. Large multicenter prospective studies can confirm the utility of this routinely available marker for patients with sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":53204,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819754/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2632010X221075592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Early diagnosis of sepsis and its severity is essential for appropriate treatment to improve patient survival, especially in resource-limited settings. The aim of the present study was to study the role of red blood cell distribution (RDW) as a biomarker for the early detection of severe sepsis defined clinically and also in the prediction of mortality from sepsis.

Methods: The cross-sectional study included a total of 175 subjects who met the inclusion criteria for the diagnosis of severe sepsis. After a thorough clinical examination, blood samples were taken from all patients within 3 hours of presenting the disease. The RDW values and other investigations were studied on the day of admission compared to other severity markers with the mortality index of 30 days.

Result: The RDW value was significantly higher in patients with severe sepsis and in non-survivor patients than in survivors (P < .0001). There was a strong correlation between the SOFA score and RDW in predicting the disease outcome with the Pearson correlation coefficient of r = .46. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was found to be 0.852 at a CI of 95% (0.796-0.909) with RDW 17.15, sensitivity was 88.6% and specificity was 63.5%. There was a positive correlation with Pearson's correlation coefficient of r = .46 between RDW and the SOFA score.

Conclusions: RDW can be used as a potential marker for the early detection of severe sepsis and in the prediction of the outcome. Large multicenter prospective studies can confirm the utility of this routinely available marker for patients with sepsis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
红细胞分布宽度作为临床败血症患者死亡率的预测因子:来自印度中部单一农村中心的经验。
简介:早期诊断败血症及其严重程度对于适当治疗以提高患者生存率至关重要,特别是在资源有限的情况下。本研究的目的是研究红细胞分布(RDW)作为临床定义的严重脓毒症早期检测和脓毒症死亡率预测的生物标志物的作用。方法:横断面研究共纳入175名符合严重脓毒症诊断标准的受试者。经过彻底的临床检查,在发病后3小时内采集了所有患者的血样。入院当天的RDW值及其他调查与其他严重程度指标比较,死亡率指数为30天。结果:严重脓毒症患者和非存活患者的RDW值显著高于存活患者(P r = 0.46)。受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.852,CI为95% (0.796 ~ 0.909),RDW为17.15,敏感性为88.6%,特异性为63.5%。与Pearson相关系数r =呈正相关。RDW与SOFA评分之间的差距为46。结论:RDW可作为早期发现严重脓毒症和预测预后的潜在标志物。大型多中心前瞻性研究可以证实这种常规可用标志物对脓毒症患者的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pathology
Clinical Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
66
期刊最新文献
Poroid Neoplasms: A Clinicopathological Study of 13 Cases. A Case of Cotyledonoid-Dissecting Leiomyoma - The Utility of Laparoscopic Biopsy and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs. Diagnosing B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 2 pediatric patients with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Primary Breast Lymphoma: A Case Report of a Common Tumor in an Uncommon Location. Clinical and Pathological Features of the Nested Subtype of Urothelial Carcinoma With Lymph Node Metastasis as the Initial Presentation: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1