Psychological and Neural Differences of Music Processing in Autistic Individuals: A Scoping Review.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q1 Arts and Humanities Journal of Music Therapy Pub Date : 2022-03-21 DOI:10.1093/jmt/thab020
Eugenia Hernandez-Ruiz, Ruowen Qi, Emily Welsh, Madelyn Wampler, Liesel Bradshaw
{"title":"Psychological and Neural Differences of Music Processing in Autistic Individuals: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Eugenia Hernandez-Ruiz,&nbsp;Ruowen Qi,&nbsp;Emily Welsh,&nbsp;Madelyn Wampler,&nbsp;Liesel Bradshaw","doi":"10.1093/jmt/thab020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite abundant research and clinical evidence of the effectiveness of music interventions for people in the autism spectrum, understanding of music processing in this community is limited. We explored whether research evidence of differences in music processing within the autistic community is available. We developed a scoping review to search for literature with the terms \"music\", \"processing,\" and \"autism\" (and variants). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, ERIC, and Music Index databases for a total of 10,857 articles, with 5,236 duplicates. The remaining 5,621 titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility by a team of four undergraduate and graduate students and the PI. Seventy-five studies were included for data extraction. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics regarding author, study, stimulus, and participant information, and a thematic analysis of outcome and findings. Our findings are preliminary given the emerging nature of the literature, the use of mostly non-musical auditory stimuli, passive listening experiences, and underreported demographics. However, the literature shows some evidence of differences in music processing for autistic individuals, including reduced habituation to non-musical and musical stimuli; truncated, delayed, or divergent developmental trajectories; and possible compensatory higher-order mechanisms that yield similar behavioral responses even in the presence of divergent neural correlates. Music therapists are encouraged to adopt a developmental perspective, not only of general skills, but specifically of music skill development in this community, and to extrapolate these findings with caution, given the current limitations in the evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47143,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Music Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/thab020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite abundant research and clinical evidence of the effectiveness of music interventions for people in the autism spectrum, understanding of music processing in this community is limited. We explored whether research evidence of differences in music processing within the autistic community is available. We developed a scoping review to search for literature with the terms "music", "processing," and "autism" (and variants). We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, Academic Search Complete, ERIC, and Music Index databases for a total of 10,857 articles, with 5,236 duplicates. The remaining 5,621 titles and abstracts were screened for eligibility by a team of four undergraduate and graduate students and the PI. Seventy-five studies were included for data extraction. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics regarding author, study, stimulus, and participant information, and a thematic analysis of outcome and findings. Our findings are preliminary given the emerging nature of the literature, the use of mostly non-musical auditory stimuli, passive listening experiences, and underreported demographics. However, the literature shows some evidence of differences in music processing for autistic individuals, including reduced habituation to non-musical and musical stimuli; truncated, delayed, or divergent developmental trajectories; and possible compensatory higher-order mechanisms that yield similar behavioral responses even in the presence of divergent neural correlates. Music therapists are encouraged to adopt a developmental perspective, not only of general skills, but specifically of music skill development in this community, and to extrapolate these findings with caution, given the current limitations in the evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自闭症个体音乐加工的心理和神经差异:范围回顾。
尽管有大量的研究和临床证据表明音乐干预对自闭症患者的有效性,但对这个群体的音乐处理的理解是有限的。我们探索了自闭症群体中音乐处理差异的研究证据是否可用。我们开发了一个范围审查,以搜索术语“音乐”、“加工”和“自闭症”(及其变体)的文献。我们检索了PubMed、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、PsycInfo、Academic Search Complete、ERIC和Music Index数据库,共检索了10,857篇文章,其中有5,236篇重复。剩下的5621个题目和摘要是由四名本科生和研究生以及PI组成的团队筛选的。纳入75项研究进行数据提取。对数据进行描述性统计,包括作者、研究、刺激因素和参与者信息,并对结果和发现进行专题分析。我们的研究结果是初步的,考虑到文献的新兴性质,主要是非音乐听觉刺激的使用,被动的倾听体验,以及未被报道的人口统计数据。然而,文献显示了自闭症个体在音乐处理方面的一些差异,包括对非音乐和音乐刺激的习惯程度降低;发育轨迹中断的、延迟的或发散的;以及可能的代偿性高阶机制,即使存在不同的神经关联,也会产生相似的行为反应。音乐治疗师被鼓励采用一种发展的观点,不仅是一般的技能,而且特别是在这个社区的音乐技能发展,并且考虑到目前证据的局限性,谨慎地推断这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Music Therapy
Journal of Music Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Developing Music Therapy in Maternity Care in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Scoping Review of Music Interventions Aimed at Improving Reading Skills in Children with Specific Learning Disorders in Reading. Telehealth Engaged Music for Pain Outcomes: A Music and Imagery Proof-of-concept Study with Veterans. Professional Development and Learning Through the Research Process. Music Therapists´ Job Satisfaction and Related Factors: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Five European Countries and Israel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1