Re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer.

IF 1.8 Q3 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-07 DOI:10.3857/roj.2021.00640
Hye In Lee, Jin Ho Kim, Soon-Hyun Ahn, Eun-Jae Chung, Bhumsuk Keam, Keun-Yong Eom, Woo-Jin Jeong, Ji-Won Kim, Chan Woo Wee, Hong-Gyun Wu
{"title":"Re-irradiation for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer.","authors":"Hye In Lee,&nbsp;Jin Ho Kim,&nbsp;Soon-Hyun Ahn,&nbsp;Eun-Jae Chung,&nbsp;Bhumsuk Keam,&nbsp;Keun-Yong Eom,&nbsp;Woo-Jin Jeong,&nbsp;Ji-Won Kim,&nbsp;Chan Woo Wee,&nbsp;Hong-Gyun Wu","doi":"10.3857/roj.2021.00640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based re-irradiation (reRT) for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (HNC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent IMRT-based reRT for recurrent or second primary HNC between 2007 and 2019 at two institutions were included. Medical records and dosimetric data were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), severe late toxicities, and clinicopathological prognostic factors were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range, 3.7 to 85.8 months), the median OS was 28.9 months with a 2-year OS rate of 54.6%. The median PFS and 2-year PFS rates were 10.0 months and 30.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that good performance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1), a longer time interval (≥24 months) between radiotherapy courses, and higher reRT dose (>60 Gy) were significantly favorable factors for OS (all p < 0.05). Higher reRT dose and salvage surgery were significantly associated with improved PFS (all p < 0.05). Regarding the Multi-Institution Reirradiation (MIRI) Collaborative RPA classification, the 2-year OS rates of each class were 87.5% in class I, 51.8% in class II, and 0% in class III (p = 0.008). Grade ≥3 late toxicity was reported in 10 (23.8%) patients. There was no significant factor associated with increased late toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IMRT-based reRT should be considered as a treatment option for patients with recurrent or second primary HNC. Further trials are needed to establish a subset of patients who may benefit from reRT without severe late toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":46572,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology Journal","volume":"39 4","pages":"279-287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/93/roj-2021-00640.PMC8743457.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2021.00640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based re-irradiation (reRT) for recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer (HNC).

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent IMRT-based reRT for recurrent or second primary HNC between 2007 and 2019 at two institutions were included. Medical records and dosimetric data were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), severe late toxicities, and clinicopathological prognostic factors were analyzed.

Results: A total of 42 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 15.1 months (range, 3.7 to 85.8 months), the median OS was 28.9 months with a 2-year OS rate of 54.6%. The median PFS and 2-year PFS rates were 10.0 months and 30.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that good performance (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0 or 1), a longer time interval (≥24 months) between radiotherapy courses, and higher reRT dose (>60 Gy) were significantly favorable factors for OS (all p < 0.05). Higher reRT dose and salvage surgery were significantly associated with improved PFS (all p < 0.05). Regarding the Multi-Institution Reirradiation (MIRI) Collaborative RPA classification, the 2-year OS rates of each class were 87.5% in class I, 51.8% in class II, and 0% in class III (p = 0.008). Grade ≥3 late toxicity was reported in 10 (23.8%) patients. There was no significant factor associated with increased late toxicities.

Conclusion: IMRT-based reRT should be considered as a treatment option for patients with recurrent or second primary HNC. Further trials are needed to establish a subset of patients who may benefit from reRT without severe late toxicity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
复发或第二原发头颈癌的再照射。
目的:探讨调强放疗(IMRT)为基础的再照射(rt)治疗复发或继发头颈癌(HNC)的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:纳入2007年至2019年间在两家机构接受基于imrt的复发性或第二原发性HNC的患者。回顾性回顾了医疗记录和剂量学数据。分析总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、严重晚期毒性和临床病理预后因素。结果:共分析42例患者。中位随访时间为15.1个月(范围3.7 - 85.8个月),中位OS为28.9个月,2年OS率为54.6%。中位PFS和2年PFS率分别为10.0个月和30.9%。多因素分析显示,较好的疗效(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] 0或1)、较长的放疗间隔(≥24个月)和较高的rt剂量(>60 Gy)是OS的显著有利因素(均p < 0.05)。较高的rt剂量和挽救性手术与改善PFS显著相关(均p < 0.05)。在多机构再照射(MIRI)协同RPA分类中,各分类的2年OS率分别为I类87.5%、II类51.8%、III类0% (p = 0.008)。10例(23.8%)患者报告了≥3级晚期毒性。没有显著因素与晚期毒性增加相关。结论:对于复发性或第二原发性HNC患者,应考虑以imrt为基础的rt治疗。需要进一步的试验来确定可能从rt中获益且没有严重晚期毒性的患者亚群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Proton beam therapy as a promising option for high-risk limited stage small cell lung cancer: revealing potential of future novel agents Different approaches to target volume definition and boost delivery in surgery de-escalation clinical trial in breast cancer patients with pathological complete response Target movement according to cervical lymph node level in head and neck cancer and its clinical significance Comparison of radiotherapy techniques in patients with thymic epithelial tumor who underwent postoperative radiotherapy Pulmonary function and toxicities of proton versus photon for limited-stage small cell lung cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1